Mechanistic Clinical Trial of Individualized tDCS for Hallucinations in Schizophrenia

March 24, 2022 updated by: Michael Avissar, Columbia University
This project compares standard tDCS to individualized high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) for treatment of auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The large majority of patients with schizophrenia (Sz) experience auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) as a core feature of their disorder. Treatment-resistant auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) affect a third of patients with schizophrenia and can cause increased aggression, distress, suicide, and social dysfunction. This project will investigate the efficacy of different types of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a neurostimulation technique that passes a weak electric current through the brain, in alleviating AVH in Sz patients, and will explore hypotheses regarding brain circuits involved in AVH.

This project compares standard tDCS to individualized high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) for treatment of AVH. In standard tDCS, two large electrodes are positioned on the scalp above regions of the brain implicated in abnormal cortical activity associated with auditory verbal hallucinations in Sz. Due to the size of standard tDCS electrodes and the positions required to stimulate language areas, large unrelated areas of the brain are also stimulated. HD-tDCS is a novel technique that uses multiple smaller electrodes to produce a more focal electrical field (EF) than standard tDCS. The HD-tDCS used in this study modulates brain activity in a targeted area without stimulating as many unrelated areas. This targeted inhibition allows us to test hypotheses regarding different cortical regions and their roles in specific features of AVH (e.g. loudness and salience).

Participants are randomized to receive either active standard tDCS or active HD-tDCS targeting one of two language-processing areas of the brain, or a sham version of one of these stimulation types. For each participant receiving HD-tDCS, structural MRI is used to computationally model the electrical field produced in their individual brain anatomy by tDCS. These models are then used to select individualized electrode configurations and current settings to target the same language areas across subjects. The effect of stimulation on relevant brain functions is verified by measuring pre/post treatment changes in resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) within and between targeted language regions, which has been previously linked to AVH symptoms. Differences in behavioral task performance and neurophysiological abnormalities associated with AVH are also tested pre/post treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • DSM-V diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
  • Capacity and willingness to provide informed consent
  • Mean AHRS item score of greater or equal to 2.
  • If female and not infertile, must agree to use one of the following forms of contraception for the duration of study participation: systemic hormonal treatment, an IUD which was implanted at least 2 months prior to screening, or "double-barrier" contraception. Women of child bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening
  • Right handed
  • Normal hearing
  • Taking an antipsychotic medication at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks. All oral and depot antipsychotics are allowable.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence or positive history of unstable significant medical or neurological illness
  • Substance use disorder (excluding nicotine) within last 90 days, or positive toxicology screen for any substance of abuse
  • Pregnancy
  • Participation in study of investigational medication/device within 4 weeks
  • History of seizure, epilepsy in self or first-degree relatives, stroke, brain surgery, head injury with loss of consciousness >1 hour or clear cognitive sequelae, intracranial metal implants, known structural brain lesion, devices that may be affected by tDCS (pacemaker, medication pump, cochlear implant, implanted brain stimulator)
  • Subjects with suicidal ideation with intent or plan (indicated by affirmative answers to items 4 or 5 of the Suicidal Ideation section of the baseline C-SSRS) in the 6 months prior to screening or subjects who represent a significant risk of suicide in the opinion of the investigator
  • Frequent and persistent migraines
  • Clinically significant skin disease
  • Current use of medications known to lower seizure threshold (Lithium, Theophyline, Tricyclic antidepressants, Buproprion >450 mg/day and Clozapine >600 mg/day, brand name and generic methylphenidate/mixed amphetamine salts)
  • History of prior clinically significant, adverse response to neurostimulation or open skin wounds that would preclude safe placement of tDCS electrodes
  • Contraindication to MRI scanning, including metal implants or claustrophobia. Metal implants, pacemaker, other metal (e.g., shrapnel or surgical prostheses) or paramagnetic objects contained within the body which may present a risk to the subject or interfere with MR scan
  • Medicinal patch, unless removed

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: standard tDCS
20 min of standard 2-electrode transcranial direct current stimulation (2 mA) at a previously reported scalp location.
Device: neuroConn DC-Stimulator MR
standard tDCS, active & sham
Active Comparator: HD-tDCS - anterior target
20 min of individualized high-density 5-electrode transcranial direct current stimulation to anterior language areas of the brain.
Device: Soterix MxN HD-tES
HD-tDCS, active & sham
Active Comparator: HD-tDCS - posterior target
20 min of individualized high-density 5-electrode transcranial direct current stimulation to posterior language areas of the brain.
Device: Soterix MxN HD-tES
HD-tDCS, active & sham
Sham Comparator: sham tDCS
sham transcranial direct current stimulation using a brief pulse at the beginning and end of the 20 min intervention.
Device: neuroConn DC-Stimulator MR
standard tDCS, active & sham
Device: Soterix MxN HD-tES
HD-tDCS, active & sham

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Auditory Hallucination Rating Scale (AHRS)
Time Frame: 1 week
Questionnaire-based assessment instrument for auditory verbal hallucinations, completed by study personnel.
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 24, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 7882

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia and Related Disorders

Clinical Trials on neuroConn DC-Stimulator MR

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings