Cervical Motor Control Exercises in Strength and Perception of Effort in Electronic Sports Players
Effectiveness of a Physical Therapy Intervention Through Cervical Motor Control Exercises in the Improvement of Strength and Perception of Effort in Electronic Sports Players. A Randomized Clinical Study
Introduction. One of the most common injuries in competitive esports professionals is dorsolumbar and neck pain, due to the effort caused by the maintenance of the site for long periods of time. Cervical motor control exercises recruit the deep musculature by increasing its strength and reducing muscle fatigue.
Aim. Evaluate the effectiveness of motor control exercises in cervical muscle fatigue and strength, in electronic athletes from 18 to 25 years.
Study design. Randomized clinical trial, simple blind. Methods. 30 electronic athletes will be randomly assigned in two groups: experimental (which will perform 3 sessions of 3 motor control exercises) and control (which will not perform any type of intervention). The intervention will last 6 weeks, with 3 weekly sessions of 10 minutes each. The study variables are the muscle strength of the deep cervical muscle (measured by a stabilizer pressure gauge) and the subjective perception of the effort (Borg scale).
Expected results. The aim is an improvement in the muscular strength of deep cervical muscles, together with a decrease in subjective perception of exertion.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Madrid, Spain, 28670
- European University of Madrid
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Electronic sportsmen
- Male sex
- From 18 to 25 years
- That at the time of the study participate in national competitions
- That they have not suffered a musculoskeletal pathology in the last 4 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Athletes taking anti-inflammatory drugs that may influence the intervention
- Players who are allergic to nylon (main component of the evaluation device)
- That they have not signed the informed consent document.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental group
Each session will last 10 minutes, taking place 3 days a week, over a period of 6 weeks. The intervention will take place at the beginning of the training session. The intervention will be carried out in 3 sessions with 3 exercises of 15 repetitions, and with breaks of 40 seconds between each series and exercise. Exercise 1. In quadruped position, keeping the back flat, making an isometric contraction of the transverse muscle, and raising one arm and one leg contralaterally. Exercise 2. Training of the deep cervical flexor muscles, supine. Players will move their heads slowly towards craniocervical flexion. Exercise 3. In standing position, an ocular-cervical coordination exercise by means of a cranio-cervical flexion, adding a rotation, guided by an eye feedback provided by the physiotherapist by means of a laser projected on a wall. |
The intervention through motor control will consist in the application of the protocol described by Hidalgo-Peréz et al.
The objective of the application of the technique is to produce an increase in the strength of the deep cervical musculature.
The exercises will be performed with the subject in different positions: supine, quadrupedic and standing position.
The physiotherapist will be placed in standing position in front of the subject.
The intervention will be carried out in 3 sessions with 3 exercises of 15 repetitions, and with breaks of 40 seconds between each series and exercise.
|
|
No Intervention: Control group
Athletes in the control group will be asked to follow their usual warm-up routine.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline strength of the deep cervical musculature after treatment and at 1 month
Time Frame: Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visit
|
An assessment will be carried out with a pressure gauge (Stabilizer model).
It will be used according to the protocol indicated by Hudswell et al.
The athlete will be positioned supine.
The pressure gauge will be placed on the stretcher in the posterior cervical area, asking the subject for a craniocervical flexion.
The unit of measure of this measuring instrument is mmHg.
A higher score indicates greater strength.
|
Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visit
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline subjective perception of effort after treatment and at 1 month
Time Frame: Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visit
|
It will be done by administering the Borg scale.
With this scale, the perception of effort will be measured.
After the intervention, we will ask the athlete to assign a number from 0 to 10 to represent the subjective feeling of the amount of work done.
The scoring range is from 0 to 10 points, where a higher score will indicate a greater perception of effort.
|
Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visit
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CMOTOR
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sports Physical Therapy
-
NCT04690777CompletedGait | Physical Therapy | Sports Physical Therapy | Exercise Therapy
-
NCT07578935Recruiting
-
NCT07438587Not yet recruitingSports Physical Therapy
-
NCT06796842Not yet recruitingSports Physical Therapy
-
NCT06511375RecruitingSports Physical Therapy
-
NCT06509711RecruitingSports Physical Therapy
-
NCT06184672Not yet recruitingSports Physical Therapy
-
NCT06131073RecruitingSports Physical Therapy
-
NCT07440745CompletedSports Physical Therapy
Clinical Trials on Control motor intervention
-
NCT00858910Completed
-
NCT04353297CompletedStroke | Motor Disorders
-
NCT03078673Completed
-
NCT05333562Completed
-
NCT05957952Active, not recruitingShoulder Impingement Syndrome
-
NCT07487987Recruiting