FAME: Functional Assessment of a Myoelectric Orthosis Hand Orthoses (FAME)
Functional Assistance Provided by Myoelectric Elbow-wrist- Hand Orthosis
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
- The Ohio State University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Manual Muscle Test >1/5 in the paretic biceps, triceps, finger extensors and finger flexors;
- score > 10 < 30 on the Upper extremity Fugl Meyer AND active shoulder flexion of at least 30 degrees with device weight on affected arm;
- Ability to generate consistent, detectable EMG signal from the bicep/tricep upper arm and distal forearm flexor and extensor sensor sites with wrist in neutral, and fingers in neutral. At rest, achieve an EMG of 5 or below on myConfig (wrist and fingers in neutral and elbow extended); with gain at < 10 and boost <12, able to reach a threshold of 10 at both bicep and wrist flexors/extensors;
- a single stroke that is the cause of arm impairment, experienced >12 months ago; if there are additional asymptomatic lesions (as diagnosed by MRI), these subjects may also be included. Those with another symptomatic stroke in addition to the stroke causing arm impairment are excluded;
- score >70 on the Modified Mini Mental Status Examination;
- age >18< 85;
- > 6 months since previous functional or therapeutic use of an upper extremity myoelectric orthosis;
- Height >5'0";
- Weight >110< 250 lbs.;
- Forearm circumference (at widest part) <13 in.;
- Bicep circumference >9 <15 in.;
- Upper arm length >5.5 in.;
- Wrist thickness (anterior- posterior) <1.75 in.;
- ability to stand with minimal assistance
Exclusion Criteria:
- > 5 on a 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale for pain in the paretic hand, arm or shoulder;
- > 3 on the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale in the paretic elbow, >2 at wrist or fingers;
- < 2.5 on the Alexander Apraxia scale; '
- history of neurological disorder other than stroke;
- change in anti-spasticity medications in the last 6 months, and/or receipt of botulinum toxin in the paretic UE in the previous 4 months;
- elbow contracture greater than 10 degrees;
- inability to passively extend fingers while wrist is in neutral;
- other conditions or physical/mental attributes that may undermine safety and/or full participation in the study;
- bilateral hemiparesis.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: MyoPro 2 Motion-G-orthosis-None
Following screening, all subjects receive 2 education sessions, during which they are trained on the donning and use of the MyoPro 2 Motion-G, Comfy Splint orthosis, and no device, all on the affected UE.
The presentation and training on these interventions is non-randomized and administered to all subjects.
After these training sessions, all subjects complete a battery of three tests while wearing one of the two devices, or no device.
The order in which the tests are administered is randomized.
|
all subjects receive 2 education sessions, during which they are trained on the donning and use of the MyoPro 2 Motion-G, orthosis, and no device, all on the affected UE.
The presentation and training on these interventions is non-randomized and administered to all subjects.
|
|
Active Comparator: Comfy Splint
Following screening, all subjects receive 2 education sessions, during which they are trained on the donning and use of the MyoPro 2 Motion-G, Comfy Splint orthosis, and no device, all on the affected UE.
The presentation and training on these interventions is non-randomized and administered to all subjects.
After these training sessions, all subjects complete a battery of three tests while wearing one of the two devices, or no device.
The order in which the tests are administered is randomized.
|
all subjects receive 2 education sessions, during which they are trained on the donning and use of the MyoPro 2 Motion-G, orthosis, and no device, all on the affected UE.
The presentation and training on these interventions is non-randomized and administered to all subjects.
|
|
Active Comparator: No Splint
Following screening, all subjects receive 2 education sessions, during which they are trained on the donning and use of the MyoPro 2 Motion-G, Comfy Splint orthosis, and no device, all on the affected UE.
The presentation and training on these interventions is non-randomized and administered to all subjects.
After these training sessions, all subjects complete a battery of three tests while wearing one of the two devices, or no device.
The order in which the tests are administered is randomized.
|
all subjects receive 2 education sessions, during which they are trained on the donning and use of the MyoPro 2 Motion-G, orthosis, and no device, all on the affected UE.
The presentation and training on these interventions is non-randomized and administered to all subjects.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
0 - See Description
Time Frame: see description above
|
The PI is no longer at The Ohio State University and is not actively working at another institution for record transfer.
We contacted remaining study team members and department chair to obtain updates for these records.
We were told the PI was dismissed and there was alleged noncompliance and misconduct.
The study team and department chair are unable to confirm if available documents for these records are accurate.
|
see description above
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2016H0339
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.