CSF/Serum Biomarkers in Predicting PND/Persistent Pain After Cesarean

December 14, 2023 updated by: Duke University

The Role of Cerebrospinal Fluid and Serum Inflammatory Biomarkers in Predicting Perinatal Depression and Persistent Pain After Cesarean Delivery

The aim is to investigate if inflammatory biomarkers in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are associated with the development of perinatal depression and/or persistent pain after cesarean delivery.

This study will obtain CSF and blood samples in 70 parturients. All parturients will be assessed for perinatal depression and persistent pain, and the presence/absence of these outcomes will be correlated to changes in the inflammatory biomarkers within the samples collected. If present, consistent changes in biomarkers correlating with perinatal depression or persistent pain may be utilised as a predictive tool and facilitate early treatment for these conditions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Persistent pain and perinatal depression (PND) contribute significantly to maternal morbidity and mortality after cesarean delivery. Neuroinflammation has been associated with both persistent pain and perinatal depression, and may therefore be a common etiological process, however, little is known of the association between neuroinflammation and persistent pain or PND in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery.

Aim 1: To compare neuroinflammatory cytokine profiles (in CSF and plasma samples within 48 hours after surgery) between the cohort of parturients that develop the composite outcome of persistent pain or PND (defined below), versus the cohort of parturients that did not develop this outcome.

Aim 2. To determine the correlation between the neuroinflammatory cytokine profiles of CSF and plasma.

Exploratory aim: To determine the change in plasma inflammatory cytokine profile from the antenatal to the postnatal period, and correlate this change with preoperative quantitative sensory tests, acute postsurgical pain severity, and development of persistent pain and/or PND. To examine proteomics in CSF and correlate with persistent pain and/or PND.

This is a prospective cohort study of 70 adult parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery at Duke University Hospital. After obtaining informed consent, baseline demographic data, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), mechanical temporal summation (MTS), and pain-pressure threshold (PPT) tests will be administered. During IV cannulation, 10ml of blood will be collected, and up to 10ml CSF will be collected during spinal anesthesia. After cesarean delivery, pain scores, analgesia requirements, and data on adverse events will be collected. Additional 10ml of blood will be collected within 48 hours post-surgery during inpatient hospital stay. During the routine 6-week postnatal follow up, EPDS scores will be recorded, and at 3-months, EPDS and persistent pain assessment will be conducted over the phone.

Based on a composite endpoint of persistent pain (pain at 3 months after surgery) or PND (EPDS of 10 or greater, during pregnancy or within 3 months after delivery), parturients will be stratified into "study" or "control" cohorts. Using a validated multiplex quantitative proteomic approach, candidate biomarkers will be quantified and correlated against the composite outcome using two-sided Mann-Whitney U test. Correlation between CSF and plasma cytokines will be assessed using spearman correlation. The exploratory aim will be analyzed with generalized linear models.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
81

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Tertiary care hospital, specialist obstetric unit

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 2 and 3
  • English speaking
  • 18 years or older
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Gestational age > 37 weeks
  • Scheduled cesarean delivery under spinal or combined spinal epidural anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intravenous drug or chronic opioid use
  • Anti-depressant or anxiolytic drug use
  • Allergy to standard of care drugs
  • Cesarean delivery under general anesthesia or epidural anesthesia
  • Pre-eclampsia needing magnesium sulfate
  • Chronic PO/IV analgesic or glucocorticoids
  • History of chronic pain syndromes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Study

Parturients that underwent cesarean delivery and is POSITIVE for the composite outcome of either:

  • perinatal depression (Edinburgh postnatal depression scale >=10 during pregnancy or within 3 months after delivery), and/or
  • persistent pain (pain score >=3 at pelvic or lower abdominal areas at 3 months after delivery)
Other: No intervention
No intervention
Control

Parturients that underwent cesarean delivery and is NEGATIVE for the composite outcome of both:

  • perinatal depression (Edinburgh postnatal depression scale >=10 during pregnancy or within 3 months after delivery), AND
  • persistent pain (pain score >=3 at pelvic or lower abdominal areas at 3 months after delivery)
Other: No intervention
No intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perinatal depression
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after delivery
Edinburgh postnatal depression scale >=10 (minimum 0, maximum 30, increasing score indicates higher likelihood of depression)
Up to 3 months after delivery
Persistent pain: Pain score
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after delivery
Pain score >=3 at pelvic or lower abdominal areas (minimum 0, maximum 10, higher score indicates greater pain)
Up to 3 months after delivery
Inflammatory cytokines/biomarkers
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after surgery

Biomarkers from CSF and plasma samples will be quantified using Meso Scale Discovery multiplex kit (K15210D), for:

CRP, Eotaxin, Eotaxin-3, FGF (basic), ICAM-1, IFN-γ, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12/IL-23p40, IL-13, IL-15, IL-16, IL-17A, IP-10, MCP-1, MCP-4, MDC, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, PlGF, SAA, TARC, Tie-2, TNF-α, TNF-β, VCAM-1, VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, VEGFR-1/Flt-1.

The levels of these biomarkers will be compared between the group with depression/persistent pain, versus the group without depression/persistent pain.
Up to 24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CSF compared to plasma inflammatory cytokines/biomarkers
Time Frame: Preoperative samples

Biomarkers will be quantified using Meso Scale Discovery multiplex kit (K15210D), for:

CRP, Eotaxin, Eotaxin-3, FGF (basic), ICAM-1, IFN-γ, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12/IL-23p40, IL-13, IL-15, IL-16, IL-17A, IP-10, MCP-1, MCP-4, MDC, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, PlGF, SAA, TARC, Tie-2, TNF-α, TNF-β, VCAM-1, VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, VEGFR-1/Flt-1

The CSF and plasma levels of these biomarkers will be compared within each group (group with depression/persistent pain, versus group without depression/persistent pain)
Preoperative samples

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Duke University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mary Yurashevich, Duke University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 28, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 28, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 12, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 14, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00104111

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings