High-definition Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation
Application of High-definition Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in the Upper Extremity Rehabilitation
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital,Ministry of Health and Welfare
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 110
- Taipei Medical University Hospital
-
Taipei, Taiwan
- Taipei Municipal Wanfang Hospital - Taipei Medical University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 20 years.
- Unilateral cerebral stroke with hemiplegia in Brunnstrom stage III-V.
- 6 months to 5 years after stroke.
- Muscular inelasticity (spasticity) 1-3 on the affected upper limb, evaluated by the Modified Ashworth Scale.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Extremely sensitive to electrical stimulation and cannot tolerate it.
- Contracture on upper extremities, and limitation in joint range of motion.
- The muscle tone was severe spasticity,
- Ossification or inflammation in muscle tissue.
- A history of cardiopulmonary disease or arrhythmia.
- With implantable medical electronic devices, like pacemaker.
- Pressure sores or wounds on the skin of head and upper extremities.
- Metal implants in the head (neck).
- Severe cognitive or psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia or dissociative identity disorder.
- A history of seizure or other brain pathology.
- Brain surgery or severe brain trauma.
- Drug or alcohol abuse.
- Malignant neoplasm or rheumatism disorder, like SLE, RA, or AS.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: HD-tCES & upper extremity rehabilitation
The experiment group will receive HD-tCES combined with upper extremity rehabilitation of affected side.
|
The positions of the lesion side primary motor cortex were defined as C3/C4 according to the international 10-20 system of electroencephalograms.
HD-tCES will be applied for 20 minutes at an intensity of 1.0 mA direct current stimulation and a specific-added waveform each time, 3 times a week, lasting for 4 weeks.
Upper extremity rehabilitation programs will be selected and graded in accordance with each patient's upper extremity function and specific aims of activities of daily living.
Upper extremity rehabilitation will be provided for 30 minutes each time, 3 times a week, lasting for 4 weeks.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham HD-tCES & upper extremity rehabilitation
The sham control group will receive sham HD-tCES combined with upper extremity rehabilitation of affected side.
|
Upper extremity rehabilitation programs will be selected and graded in accordance with each patient's upper extremity function and specific aims of activities of daily living.
Upper extremity rehabilitation will be provided for 30 minutes each time, 3 times a week, lasting for 4 weeks.
The positions of the lesion side primary motor cortex were defined as C3/C4 according to the international 10-20 system of electroencephalograms.
Sham HD-tCES will consist of a 5-second ramp up to 1.0 mA direct current stimulation and a specific-added waveform followed immediately by a 5-second ramp down, no current in the middle 19 minutes 40 seconds, and a ramp-up and ramp-down period during the last 10 seconds.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity scale (FMA-UE) after intervention
Time Frame: Baseline (within 7 days ahead to the 1st intervention session) and after 4-week intervention (within 7 days after the last intervention session)
|
The FMA-UE assesses motor functioning of upper extremity.
Each movement is estimated by a 3-point scale (0-1-2).
The total score of the FMA-UE is 66, and a higher score indicates that the patient has better movement ability.
|
Baseline (within 7 days ahead to the 1st intervention session) and after 4-week intervention (within 7 days after the last intervention session)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) after intervention
Time Frame: Baseline (within 7 days ahead to the 1st intervention session) and after 4-week intervention (within 7 days after the last intervention session)
|
The WMFT assesses upper extremity motor ability through timed and functional tasks.
The items are rated on a 6-point scale (0-1-2-3-4-5).
The total score of the WMFT is 75, with higher scores indicating higher functioning levels.
|
Baseline (within 7 days ahead to the 1st intervention session) and after 4-week intervention (within 7 days after the last intervention session)
|
|
Change from baseline in the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTT) after intervention
Time Frame: Baseline (within 7 days ahead to the 1st intervention session) and after 4-week intervention (within 7 days after the last intervention session)
|
The JTT assesses hand functions commonly used in activities of daily living.
The subtests are scored according to time taken to complete the task.
Total score is the sum of time taken for each subtest, with shorter times indicating better performance.
|
Baseline (within 7 days ahead to the 1st intervention session) and after 4-week intervention (within 7 days after the last intervention session)
|
|
Change from baseline in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) after intervention
Time Frame: Baseline (within 7 days ahead to the 1st intervention session) and after 4-week intervention (within 7 days after the last intervention session)
|
The MAS is commonly used in clinical practice for grading spasticity.
The MAS is rated on a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, 4), and a higher score indicates that the patient has higher muscle tension.
The muscles being assessed include shoulder abductor, elbow flexor, elbow extensor, wrist flexor, and finger flexor.
|
Baseline (within 7 days ahead to the 1st intervention session) and after 4-week intervention (within 7 days after the last intervention session)
|
|
Change from baseline in the Finger to Nose Test after intervention
Time Frame: Baseline (within 7 days ahead to the 1st intervention session) and after 4-week intervention (within 7 days after the last intervention session)
|
The Finger to Nose Test assesses coordination of upper-extremity movement.
The number of complete nose-target movements during a 20-second period will be recorded.
|
Baseline (within 7 days ahead to the 1st intervention session) and after 4-week intervention (within 7 days after the last intervention session)
|
|
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events [safety and tolerability]
Time Frame: Within 10 minutes after each intervention session (a total of 12 sessions, 3 sessions/week, lasting 4 weeks)
|
Immediately after each HD-tCES stimulation, the patient will be questioned about eventual side effect.
|
Within 10 minutes after each intervention session (a total of 12 sessions, 3 sessions/week, lasting 4 weeks)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Huang YJ, Wang SM, Chen C, Chen CA, Wu CW, Chen JJ, Peng CW, Lin CW, Huang SW, Chen SC. High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current with Electrical Theta Burst on Post-Stroke Motor Rehabilitation: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Sep;36(9):645-654. doi: 10.1177/15459683221121751. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
- Wang SS, Huang YJ, Chen JJ, Wu CW, Chen CA, Lin CW, Nguyen VT, Peng CW. Designing and pilot testing a novel high-definition transcranial burst electrostimulation device for neurorehabilitation. J Neural Eng. 2021 Sep 17;18(5). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac23be.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- N201909051
- MOST-108-2321-B-038-002 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Ministry of Science and Technology, R.O.C. (Taiwan))
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.