Diagnosis of Gastritis, H. Pylori Infection and Atrophic Gastritis in Dyspeptic Patients

February 9, 2021 updated by: Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas

High-Definition White Light Endoscopy vs Optical Enhancement With High Definition Optical Magnification in the Diagnosis of Gastritis, H. Pylori Infection and Atrophic Gastritis in Dyspeptic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Gastric cancer is the third most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide (1). Upper endoscopy is necessary to detect neoplastic macroscopic features at an early stage, but subtle abnormalities in the gastric mucosa are often missed or misdiagnosed (1). Helicobacter pylori (Hp) is involved in the pathogenesis of gastric diseases, such as, peptic ulcers, gastric lymphoma, and gastric cancer. Therefore, the necessity to recognize malignant gastric lesions at an early stage is imperative.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Previous I-SCAN™ technology uses white light as illumination light and digital post-processing of the reflection afterwards creates images yielding the virtual chromoendoscopic image. Emission of white light alone causes a potential limitation for the current I-SCAN™ technology to obtain high-quality images of microvascular patterns on the mucosal surface compared to narrow band imaging (NBI) with optical magnification.

Pentax Medical (HOYA, Tokyo, Japan) developed the Optical Enhancement™ (OE) System, which combines bandwidth-limited light with an endoscopy video system. The OE System combines digital signal processing with optical filters that limit the spectral characteristics of the illuminating light, connecting the peaks of the hemoglobin absorption spectrum (415 nm, 540 nm, and 570 nm) to create a continuous wavelength spectrum. This system has two modes that use different filters to optimize the visualization of specific features. Mode 1 is designed to improve visualization of microvessels with enough light. Mode 2 is designed to improve contrast of white-light observation by bringing the color tone of the overall image closer to that of natural color (white color tone) with more light than Mode 1 filter.

In addition, high definition optical magnification endoscopes have been developed and can combine high-definition imaging with optical magnification to produce detailed images with magnification of up to 136×. This imaging technique facilitates the evaluation of the superficial vascular aspects of the mucosa, enabling the identification of early signs of inflammation or lesions not previously seen with conventional endoscopy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Ecuador
    • Guayas
      • Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador, 090505
        • Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Diseases

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

A sample size was estimated with a 95% confidence interval and a 10% margin of error, based on the results of C. Robles et al. All consecutive participants will have dyspepsia according to the Rome IV criteria, and needs to be ≥18 years old. Participants need to have an epigastric pain syndrome (defined as localized pain or burning pain in the upper abdomen at least once a week, which was intermittent, nongeneralized, not relieved by defecation, and did not meet the criteria for pathology of the gallbladder or sphincter of Oddi); and/or a postprandial distress syndrome (defined as the presence of a nagging feeling of postprandial fullness after normal-volume meals, and/or early satiety that prevented the completion of a regular meal several times a week). The criteria need to be present within the 3 months prior to enrolment, and to have started ≥6 months prior to diagnosis of dyspepsia.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • above 18 years of age
  • agreed to participate in the study
  • patients with dyspepsia in accordance with Rome criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • those taking NSAIDS, PPIs or antibiotics three weeks prior invitation
  • severe uncontrolled coagulopathy
  • prior history of gastric surgery
  • those pregnant or nursing females

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
High-Definition white light endoscopy.
evaluation of the gastric mucosa with high-definition white-light endoscopy (EG-29i10 gastroscope and EPKi7010 video processor). The endoscopy images will be seen on a 27inch, flat panel, high definition LCD monitor (Radiance™ ultraSC-WU27-G1520 model) by one endoscopist, randomly assigned via esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Diagnostic test: High-Definition white light endoscopy.
evaluation of the gastric mucosa with high-definition white light endoscopy (EG-29i10 gastroscope and EPKi7010 video processor). The endoscopy images will be seen on a 27inch, flat panel, high definition LCD monitor (Radiance™ ultraSC-WU27-G1520 model) by
High-definition magnification with digital chromoendoscopy.
The subject will be evaluated by upper endoscopy with the OE System (EPK-i7010 HD Video Processor and MagniView™ EG-2990Zi Video Gastroscope) with intravenous sedation in a standardized manner. This technique involves the use of a distal black rubber hood (OE-A58; Pentax) at the tip of the endoscope, to fix the distance between the tip of the endoscope and the gastric mucosa at 2 mm. The OE System will be used in mode 1 and mode 2 without optical magnification, to obtain an overview of the gastric body and identify any gross changes in the mucosa, then optical magnification will be implemented.
Diagnostic test: High-definition magnification with digital chromoendoscopy.
Subject will be evaluated by upper endoscopy with the OE System (EPK-i7010 HD Video Processor and MagniView™ EG-2990Zi Video Gastroscope) with intravenous sedation in a standardized manner. This technique involves the use of a distal black rubber hood (OE-A58; Pentax) at the tip of the endoscope, to fix the distance between the tip of the endoscope and the gastric mucosa at 2 mm. The OE System will be used in mode 1 and mode 2 without optical magnification, to obtain an overview of the gastric body and identify any gross changes in the mucosa, then optical magnification will be implemented.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1. Overall accuracy of High-definition white light endoscopy to detect lesions compatible with gastritis, H. pylori infection, gastric atrophy or intestinal metaplasia.
Time Frame: 3-month after index endoscopy
histological analysis of gastritis, H. pylori infection, gastric atrophy or intestinal metaplasia.
3-month after index endoscopy
2. Overall accuracy of optical enhancement with optical magnification to detect lesions compatible with gastritis, H. pylori infection, gastric atrophy or intestinal metaplasia.
Time Frame: 3-month after index endoscopy
histological analysis of gastritis, H. pylori infection, gastric atrophy or intestinal metaplasia.
3-month after index endoscopy
3. Comparative analysis between High-definition white light endoscopy and optical enhancement with optical magnification with histological analysis.
Time Frame: 1-month after finishing enrollment
statistical analysis of the accuracy for both diagnostic methods
1-month after finishing enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 9, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IECED-02012020

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings