Improving Cancer-related Fatigue, Sexual Dysfunction and Quality of Life in Older Men With Cancer and Androgen Deficiency (TEMEC)

March 27, 2026 updated by: Jose Manuel Garcia, Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Research
This is a large randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine the efficacy of testosterone replacement on cancer-related fatigue in older men with solid or hematologic (blood) cancer who report fatigue and have low testosterone levels.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The overall objective is to conduct a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial to determine the efficacy of 6 months of physiological testosterone replacement therapy in improving cancer related fatigue, sexual dysfunction, and body composition and muscle function in men 55 years and older with solid or hematologic (blood) cancers, who report fatigue and have testosterone deficiency. There will be 5 study visits: 1) Screening, 2) Baseline, 3) 2-Week Dose Adjustment Visit, 4) Three-month visit (Week 12), and 5) Six-month visit. Testosterone or placebo gels will be applied by eligible trial participants at home; participants will be trained on gel application procedures by research personnel.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
230

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Jose Garcia, MD, Phd
  • Phone Number: 206 764 2984
  • Email: jg77@uw.edu

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30912
        • Recruiting
        • Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University
        • Contact:
          • Egidio Del Fabbro, MD
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Recruiting
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Shehzad Basaria, MD
        • Contact:
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98108
        • Recruiting
        • Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jose M Garcia, MD, PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men with active solid or hematologic (blood) cancers who have received or are receiving chemo- and/or radiation therapy. Patients who have no evidence of disease (NED) for 60 months or less, which means that they are <60 months from their last treatment (chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy) will be included.
  • Age: 55 years and older
  • Life expectancy of at least 6 months.
  • Serum testosterone, measured by mass spectrometry (gold standard method), of <348 ng/dl and/or free testosterone <70 pg/ml. The lower limits of the normal range for total testosterone in healthy men is 348 ng/dL and the lower limits of free testosterone is <70 pg/ml in the Framingham Heart Study sample. As sex hormone binding globulin levels may be elevated in some men with cancer (resulting in elevation in total testosterone level), some of these symptomatic men may still be hypogonadal despite having total testosterone above this cut-off limit, but their free testosterone levels may still be below the lower limit of normal. Thus, men with free testosterone <70 pg/mL will be included.
  • Fatigue. Fatigue was selected as it is a highly prevalent symptom in cancer patients. Fatigue will be defined as a score on FACIT-Fatigue subscale of <40, which best divides cancer patients from the general population with accuracy.
  • Ability and willingness to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Men with current or prior history of prostate, breast, testicular, or adrenal cancers.
  • Use of anabolic agents (testosterone, DHEA, growth hormone) within the past 6 months
  • Hematocrit >48%, serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dL
  • PSA >4 ng/ml; nodule or induration on digital rectal exam
  • Severe untreated sleep apnea
  • Uncontrolled congestive heart failure
  • Myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, revascularization surgery, stroke or thromboembolism (of any etiology) within 6 months
  • Known history of thrombophilia due to a genetic mutation (e.g. Factor V Leiden)
  • Previous stroke with residual cognitive or functional deficits
  • Inability to provide informed consent; MMSE score <24
  • Poorly controlled diabetes as defined by hemoglobin A1c >10.0%
  • Body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2
  • Bipolar disorder or schizophrenia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: testosterone 1.62% gel
Testosterone 1.62% gel will be applied daily by the participants (all participants will be trained in the application process and will be given printed instructions). The intervention will be for 6 months.
Drug: testosterone 1.62% gel
The gel will be applied daily by the participants (all participants will be trained in the application process and will be given printed instructions). The intervention will be for 6 months
Placebo Comparator: placebo gel
The placebo gel will be applied daily by the participants (all participants will be trained in the application process and will be given printed instructions). The intervention will be for 6 months.
Other: placebo gel
The gel will be applied daily by the participants (all participants will be trained in the application process and will be given printed instructions). The intervention will be for 6 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue change
Time Frame: 6 months
Primary outcome is change in fatigue score. Fatigue will be assessed by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy fatigue scale (FACIT-Fatigue)- The FACIT-Fatigue has been widely used in studies related to cancer-related fatigue and is able to detect clinically meaningful differences in fatigue scores in response to treatment. Population norms for the FACIT are also available, facilitating the interpretation of fatigue levels in patient populations. This instrument has been well-validated, is responsive to treatment and more sensitive to change in fatigue than other instruments. Score range: 0-52, the higher the score the better quality of life.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Sexual Activity Score
Time Frame: 6 months
Secondary outcome is change in sexual activity score, assessed by the Harbor-UCLA 7-day Sexual Function Questionnaire.
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Other Measures of Sexual Function
Time Frame: 6 months
Erectile function will be assessed by International Index of Erective Function (IIEF).
6 months
Change in Mood and Well-being
Time Frame: 6 months
Mood and well-being will be assessed by Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS), which includes 10 questions each for Positive Affect and Negative Affect. Many behavioral scientists consider affectivity as the cleanest window on an individual's wellbeing. The most sensitive indicator of impaired wellbeing has been shown to be affective dysregulation, which is reflected in affectivity balance. The latter incorporates negative affects (e.g., anxiety, depression) as well as positive affects (e.g., joy).
6 months
Body Composition Changes
Time Frame: 6 months
Body composition changes will be assessed by measuring lean body mass and fat mass by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
6 months
Objective Measures of Habitual Physical Activity Changes
Time Frame: 6 months
To determine changes in daily physical activity, validated actigraphy will be used.
6 months
Caregiver Burden Changes
Time Frame: 6 months
The Brief Assessment Scale for Caregivers (BASC) will be used to determine caregiver burden.
6 months
Work Productivity
Time Frame: 6 months
Loss of productivity will be evaluated using the Work Productivity and Impairment (WPAI) scale.
6 months
Qualitative Survey
Time Frame: 6 months
Qualitative interviews will be performed by a study co-investigator which will assess lived experiences of participants at baseline and at 24 weeks by conducting semi-structured, qualitative phone interviews with a randomly selected sample of 30 men in the testosterone arm and 30 men in the placebo arm (equally divided across the 3 sites).
6 months
Muscle Strength Changes
Time Frame: 6 months
Muscle strength will be assessed by measuring maximal voluntary strength in the leg press exercise by the 1-RM method.
6 months
Physical Function Changes
Time Frame: 6 months
Physical function will be evaluated using the 6-minute walk test and will also be evaluated by measuring power in the lower extremities by conducting the leg press exercise.
6 months
Sleep Quality Changes
Time Frame: 6 months
Sleep quality will be assessed using the validated Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scale and by using actigraphy.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 12, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 31, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 27, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AG061558

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on testosterone 1.62% gel

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings