Randomized Trial Comparing Gastric Bypass With and Without Cholecystectomy
Pilot Open Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Patients Undergoing Robotic Gastric Bypass With or Without Concomitant Cholecystectomy
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
We suggest performing a prospective randomized pilot trial comparing RYGB without concomitant cholecystectomy with RYGB with concomitant cholecystectomy for patients with absence of gallstones in preoperative ultrasound. Patients with ultrasonographically confirmed gallstones in the gallbladder undergo concomitant cholecystectomy at time of RYGB and are excluded from the study.Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomized according to a randomization list generated by the CRC of the University Hospital of Geneva. The randomization envelops will be opened by the study staff at the appropriate time prior to the scheduling of gastric bypass after subject selection. The randomization assignment insert will contain information specifying whether the cholecystectomy will be performed or not during gastric bypass procedure.
A total of 90 consecutive obese patients attending the Unit of Visceral Surgery of the University Hospital of Geneva who meet the criteria for bariatric surgery and where the preoperative ultrasound confirms absence of gallstones will be recruited for the study.
A prospective open randomized pilot study design will be used. At 6 follow-up visits (at discharge, 1 ,3 ,6 ,12 and 18 months post-surgery), patients will be evaluated.
This study will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, the current version of the Declaration of Helsinki, the ICH-GCP or ISO EN 14155 as wella s all national legal and regulatory requirements, the LPth (Loi sur les produits thérapeutiques 812.21) and the OClin (Ordonnance sur les essais cliniques des produits thérapeutiques 812.214.2).
Description of surgical technique One optical trocar, three 12 mm trocars and one 5 mm trocar are placed. No additional trocar has to be placed for concomitant cholecystectomy. The intervention will start with the cholecystectomy laparoscopically. A small gastric pouch (around 20-30 cc) is created using blue cartridge staplers. A standard robotic RYGB with a 75 cm biliary limb and a 150 cm antecolic alimentary limb is performed. A hand-sewn gastrojejunal and jejunojejunal anastomois are performed, using a single layer running suture of Vicryl 2.0.
Data Collection:
Pre-Operative demographic data and other variables will be collected at baseline and at some of the 6 follow-up points (at discharge, 1,3,6,12,18 months):
Ultrasound, Patient Demographics and pre-Operative History will be collected, including: Gender, age on admission for operation, BMI, Height, Weight, ASA score, history of abdominal surgery, co- morbidities (Type 2 diabetes requiring Insulin or oral medication), Hypertension requiring medication, Coronary heart disease, including history of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, coronary artery surgery Pulmonary comorbidities including history of pulmonary embolism, Sleep Apnea Tobacco use, Medication used by patient, Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, Fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, laboratory findings, QOL using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Intra-Operative Assessment: Intra-Operative data such as complications (organ lesion, bleeding, conversion), operative time, docking times, estimated blood loss will be collected
Post-Operative Assessment: From surgery to discharge, the following patient information will be collected: complications according to Clavien/Dindo Classification system, re- operation, re-admission, length of hospital stay
Our hypothesis is that the approach without cholecystectomy would be superior in terms of a decrease of perioperative adverse events and postoperative complications, as well as lenght of operation, lenght of hospital stay, overall costs with a very low risk of biliary complication in the follow up.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Minoa Jung, MD
- Phone Number: +41788497695
- Email: minoa.jung@hcuge.ch
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Marion Dietrich
- Email: marion.dietrich@hcuge.ch
Study Locations
-
-
-
Geneva, Switzerland, 1206
- Recruiting
- Visceral Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Geneva
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Monika Hagen, MD
-
Contact:
- Marion Dietrich
- Email: marion.dietrich@hcuge.ch
-
Contact:
- Minoa Jung, MD
- Phone Number: +41795534416
- Email: minoa.jung@hcuge.ch
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Nadja Niclauss, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Marco Bonino, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Pouya Iranmanesh, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients must meet the criteria of the Swiss society for the study of morbid obesity (SMOB) to undergo gastric bypass (19):
- BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2
- Having followed a 2 year adequate program of weight loss without success or a 1 year program in case of "superobesity" (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2)
- Consent to multidisciplinary follow up for 5 years
- Preoperative ultrasound without presence of gallstones or polyps
- Age ≥ 18 years
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients which have a contra-indication for gastric bypass according to the criteria of the Swiss society for the study of morbid obesity (SMOB) to undergo gastric bypass (19):
- Pregnancy
- Kidney failure (creatinine ≥ 300mmol/l, GFR < 30ml/min) without dialysis
- Cirrhosis Child B/C
- Ulcerative Colitis
- Pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis during the last 6 months
- Psychiatric contra indications
- Drug abuse (alcohol, cannabis, opioids) during the last 6 months
- Presence of gallstones on preoperative Ultrasound (which will require concomitant cholecystectomy)
- Patients with clinical diagnosis of cholecystitis defined as right upper quadrant abdominal pain, radiological signs of cholecystits and laboratory signs of infection or gallstone migration, defined as right upper quadrant and abnormal liver function tests (any increase in AST, ALT, alkaline Phosphatase, GGT and/or bilirubin).
- Previous bariatric surgery other than gastric banding
- Open bypass procedure
- Medical conditions preventing informed consent
Preoperative routine work-up includes a physical examination, vital parameters, laboratory analyses (hematology, chemistry and HbA1c), sleep apnea evaluation with Polygraphia, abdominal ultrasound, endoscopy of the stomach, pulmonary function, preoperative anesthesia consultation and psychological evaluation.
The results of these routine tests will be used to assess the patients'eligiibility to participate to the proposed pilot study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Study Arm without cholecystectomy
Study Arm: Patients with gastric bypass without concomitant cholecystectomy
|
Study Arm: robotic gastric bypass without cholecystectomy Control Arm: robotic gastric bypass with cholecystectomy
|
|
Other: Control Arm with cholecystectomy
Control Arm: Patients with gastric bypass with concomitant cholecystectomy
|
Study Arm: robotic gastric bypass without cholecystectomy Control Arm: robotic gastric bypass with cholecystectomy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Composite endpoint consisting of: a.: intraoperative adverse events b.: postoperative complications
Time Frame: within 30 days after intervention
|
Primary endpoint: 1. composite endpoint consisting of:
|
within 30 days after intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intraoperative adverse events in detail
Time Frame: day of operation
|
|
day of operation
|
|
2. Morbidity and mortality
Time Frame: 18 months
|
2. Morbidity and mortality assessed by Dindo/ Clavien Classification system
|
18 months
|
|
operation time
Time Frame: day of operation
|
length of operation time
|
day of operation
|
|
hospital stay
Time Frame: 6 months
|
length of hospital stay (discharge criteria defined as follows : absence of fever (T≤37.8),
Neutrophils ≤12G/L, Absence of anemia, no nausea, no vomiting)
|
6 months
|
|
gallstones
Time Frame: 18 months
|
occurence of asymptomatic or symptomatic gallstones
|
18 months
|
|
biliary complication
Time Frame: 18 months
|
cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, cholangitis, biliary pancreatitis
|
18 months
|
|
cost
Time Frame: 18 months
|
average cost
|
18 months
|
|
EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
|
12 months
|
|
Readmission
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Readmission
|
18 months
|
|
Re intervention
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Re intervention (Cholecystectomy, transgastric ERCP, biliary Revision)
|
18 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Minoa Jung, Dr, Visceral Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Geneva
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Shiffman ML, Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, Brewer WH, Moore EW. Gallstone formation after rapid weight loss: a prospective study in patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery for treatment of morbid obesity. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991 Aug;86(8):1000-5.
- Mason EE, Renquist KE. Gallbladder management in obesity surgery. Obes Surg. 2002 Apr;12(2):222-9. doi: 10.1381/096089202762552395.
- Schmidt JH, Hocking MP, Rout WR, Woodward ER. The case for prophylactic cholecystectomy concomitant with gastric restriction for morbid obesity. Am Surg. 1988 May;54(5):269-72.
- Everhart JE. Contributions of obesity and weight loss to gallstone disease. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Nov 15;119(10):1029-35. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-10-199311150-00010.
- Worni M, Guller U, Shah A, Gandhi M, Shah J, Rajgor D, Pietrobon R, Jacobs DO, Ostbye T. Cholecystectomy concomitant with laparoscopic gastric bypass: a trend analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample from 2001 to 2008. Obes Surg. 2012 Feb;22(2):220-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0575-y.
- Patel KR, White SC, Tejirian T, Han SH, Russell D, Vira D, Liao L, Patel KB, Gracia C, Haigh P, Dutson E, Mehran A. Gallbladder management during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: routine preoperative screening for gallstones and postoperative prophylactic medical treatment are not necessary. Am Surg. 2006 Oct;72(10):857-61.
- Weinsier RL, Ullmann DO. Gallstone formation and weight loss. Obes Res. 1993 Jan;1(1):51-6. doi: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1993.tb00008.x.
- Wudel LJ Jr, Wright JK, Debelak JP, Allos TM, Shyr Y, Chapman WC. Prevention of gallstone formation in morbidly obese patients undergoing rapid weight loss: results of a randomized controlled pilot study. J Surg Res. 2002 Jan;102(1):50-6. doi: 10.1006/jsre.2001.6322.
- Warschkow R, Tarantino I, Ukegjini K, Beutner U, Guller U, Schmied BM, Muller SA, Schultes B, Thurnheer M. Concomitant cholecystectomy during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in obese patients is not justified: a meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2013 Mar;23(3):397-407. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0852-4.
- Villegas L, Schneider B, Provost D, Chang C, Scott D, Sims T, Hill L, Hynan L, Jones D. Is routine cholecystectomy required during laparoscopic gastric bypass? Obes Surg. 2004 Jan;14(1):60-6. doi: 10.1381/096089204772787301.
- Tucker ON, Fajnwaks P, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Is concomitant cholecystectomy necessary in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery? Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2450-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9769-3. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
- Buchs NC, Morel P, Azagury DE, Jung M, Chassot G, Huber O, Hagen ME, Pugin F. Laparoscopic versus robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: lessons and long-term follow-up learned from a large prospective monocentric study. Obes Surg. 2014 Dec;24(12):2031-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1335-6.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2016-01243
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.