Analgesic Efficacy After Pancreatobiliary Surgery: Intravenous Versus Patient-controlled Epidural

April 15, 2020 updated by: Sang-Jae Park, National Cancer Center, Korea

Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy After Major Surgery in Pancreatobiliary Cancers: Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia Versus Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia

Prospective, single institute based, open label, double arm, randomized controlled trial Hypothesis: Pain control after resection of hepatobiliary tumors in patients with PCEA is more effective than in patients with IV-PCA.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Postoperative pain control is important in helping patients who underwent abdominal surgery to recover and to live a normal life. There is a method of administering painless injections to relieve postoperative pain. Currently, IV-PCA is mostly used. However, this method has a disadvantage in that the dosage of the opioid-based analgesic is increased, and thus side effects may be concerned. By administering analgesics through an epidural route approached through the thoracic vertebrae rather than intravenous injection, effective post-operative pain control and less side effects can be expected in lesser amounts. This study prospectively compared the pain control effects of IV-PCA and PCEA in patients undergoing resection of hepatobiliary tumors at the National Cancer Center, revealing that PCEA is more effective in alleviating pain after surgery. It has a purpose. In addition, the investigators will investigate and compare clinical outcomes (first fart, dietary progression, postoperative complications, etc.) of the two patient groups and investigate the side effects of PCEA and complications related to the procedure.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
110

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
    • Gyeonggi
      • Goyang, Gyeonggi, Korea, Republic of, 410-769
        • National Cancer Center
    • Gyeonggi-do
      • Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 410-769
        • National Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pancreatobiliary malignancies
  • Anticipating open surgery
  • Written concent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of previous upper abdominal open surgery
  • Psychiatric problems
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Chronic pain

Elimination Criteria

  • Rejected written concent
  • Failure to follow instructions of doctor
  • Stopped surgery due to peritoneal metastasis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: A (IV-PCA group)
IV-PCA drug: Fentanyl 3000 mcg and Oxycodone 100 mg were mixed Normal saline 200 ml
Procedure: Patient-controlled analgesia
Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia Patient-controlled epidural analgesia
Experimental: B (PCEA group)

PCEA drug: Morphine 5 mg and Ropivacaine 750 mg were mixed Normal saline 400 ml

loading of preadministered Morphine 1 mg and Ropivacaine 11.25 mg
Procedure: Patient-controlled analgesia
Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia Patient-controlled epidural analgesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of analgesic efficacy after major surgery in pancreatobiliary cancers: Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia versus patient-controlled epidural analgesia
Time Frame: Day 2 postoperatively
Comparison of pain scale (Numeric rating scale; minimum: 0, maximum: 10) of IV PCA and PCEA during ambulation on the day 2 postoperatively; Scale 0 means no pain and scale 10 means most painful
Day 2 postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Investigation and comparison of pain and clinical progress during rest after surgery, side effects of drugs administered to IV-PCA and PCEA, and complications related to PCEA procedure
Time Frame: 7 days
Comparison of pain scale (Numeric rating scale; minimum: 0, maximum: 10) of IV PCA and PCEA during rest from the day 1 to 7 postoperatively; comparison of amount of totally infused analgesics, serum level of troponin I on the day 1 postoperatively, and incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups; investigation of PCEA-related complications and adverse effects of analgesics
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Cancer Center, Korea

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 15, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NCC-2017-0274

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

3 years from the study completion date

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings