Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of the Lingual Brackets and Labial Brackets in the Leveling Phase
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Class I malocclusion
- Completed permanent dentition
- Crowding ≥ 6 mm
Exclusion Criteria:
- Tooth loss or extraction except third molars
- Having cross bite
- Having genetic or hormonal disorder
- Using a chronic drug
- Previous orthodontic treatment and prosthetic restoration
- Inappropriate oral hygiene and periodontal diseases
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Lingual brackets
Patients with moderate crowding without extraction treated with Incognito lingual bracket (3M Unitek, Bad Essen, Germany)
|
A type of bracket that applied lingual surface of teeth.
Other Names:
A type of bracket that applied labial surface of teeth.
Other Names:
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Labial brackets
Patients with moderate crowding without extraction treated with labial bracket (3M Unitek, Ca, USA
|
A type of bracket that applied lingual surface of teeth.
Other Names:
A type of bracket that applied labial surface of teeth.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Irregularity index (mm)
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
Crowding of anterior teeth changes after alignment
|
18 weeks
|
|
Distance between canine teeth (mm)
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
Measurement from right canine to left canine distance
|
18 weeks
|
|
Distance between first premolar teeth (mm)
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
Measurement from right first premolar to left first premolar distance
|
18 weeks
|
|
Distance between second premolar teeth (mm)
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
Measurement from right first premolar to left first premolar distance
|
18 weeks
|
|
Distance between first molar teeth (mm)
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
Measurement from right first molar to left first molar distance
|
18 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Arch length (mm)
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
Measurement of arch length from mesial side of right first molar to messiah side of left first molar
|
18 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Yazgı Ay Ünüvar, PhD, Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Khattab TZ, Hajeer MY, Farah H, Al-Sabbagh R. Maxillary dental arch changes following the leveling and alignment stage with lingual and labial orthodontic appliances: a preliminary report of a randomized controlled trial. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Sep 1;15(5):561-6. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1579.
- Auluck A. Lingual orthodontic treatment: what is the current evidence base? J Orthod. 2013 Sep;40 Suppl 1:S27-33. doi: 10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000073.
- Alobeid A, El-Bialy T, Reimann S, Keilig L, Cornelius D, Jager A, Bourauel C. Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod. 2018 Nov 30;40(6):660-665. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy005.
- Ziebura T, Hohoff A, Flieger S, Stamm T. Accidental debondings: Buccal vs fully individualized lingual multibracket appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 May;145(5):649-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.030.
- Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, Eliades T, Katsaros C, Bourauel C. A comparative assessment of torque generated by lingual and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2013 Jun;35(3):375-80. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs029. Epub 2012 May 9.
- Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, Katsaros C, Eliades T, Bourauel C. A comparative assessment of forces and moments generated by lingual and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2013 Feb;35(1):82-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr048. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
- Fuck LM, Wiechmann D, Drescher D. Comparison of the initial orthodontic force systems produced by a new lingual bracket system and a straight-wire appliance. J Orofac Orthop. 2005 Sep;66(5):363-76. doi: 10.1007/s00056-005-0442-3. English, German.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- DHF-15010
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.