Assessing the Utility of Peak Inspiratory Flow as a Predictor for COPD Exacerbations

April 9, 2024 updated by: Respiratory Effectiveness Group
This is an international, mulitcentre, observational, prospective study into Peak Inspiratory Flow in COPD patients that aims to: A) Determine the prevalence of suboptimal Peak Inspiratory Flow (PIF) and inadequate inhaler choice and assess the baseline characteristics of these groups. B) Assess the clinical role of PIF and inhaler choice in predicting COPD exacerbations and symptom burden. C) Assess the variability and correlation of PIF with other lung function measurements and CAT score in stable COPD. It is a 12 month study comprising one baseline assessment and 2 follow-up visits at 6 and 12 months.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Sassari, Italy
        • University Hospital Sassari
  • Korea, Republic of
      • Hanyang, Korea, Republic of
        • Hanyang University Guri Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
      • Ulsan, Korea, Republic of
        • Ulsan University Hospital
  • Malta
      • Valletta, Malta
        • Mater dei hospital
  • Singapore
      • Singapore, Singapore
        • Singapore General Hospital
      • Singapore, Singapore
        • Changi General Hospital
  • Slovenia
      • Ljubljana, Slovenia
        • Ljubljana University Medical Centre
  • Spain
      • Almeria, Spain
        • Hospital University de Torrecárdenas
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • University Hospital Vall d'Hebron
      • Granada, Spain
        • Hospital Inmaculada HLA
      • Granada, Spain
        • HU Virgen de las Nieves
      • Valencia, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario de La Ribera

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

COPD patients, who are clinically stable (4 exacerbations in previous 4 weeks) and have been taking inhaled medications for at least 6 months, but have no other chronic respiratory conditions, other than asthma or bronchiectasis.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Spirometry-defined COPD (i.e. post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC<0.7)
  2. Age ≥40 years
  3. Smokers or ex-smokers of at least 10 pack-years
  4. Clinically stable COPD (no exacerbations in the last 4 weeks)
  5. Capable of performing serial lung function tests
  6. Prescribed inhaled medication for at least 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Occurrence of an COPD exacerbation during the previous 4 weeks
  2. Have any concomitant chronic respiratory condition other than asthma or bronchiectasis (e.g. cystic fibrosis, lung fibrosis, tuberculosis)
  3. Are unable to understand the instructions of the study or to fill the questionnaires
  4. Are unwilling to sign the informed consent
  5. Are participating in a clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of suboptimal PIF and inadequate inhaler choice.
Time Frame: Baseline
Determine the prevalence of suboptimal PIF and inadequate inhaler choice.
Baseline
Exacerbations
Time Frame: 12 months
Time to first exacerbation associated with different levels of PIF.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PIF and symptom burden
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 months
PIF measurements will be correlated with COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores. CAT scores range from 0-40 depending on the severity of a persons symptoms; higher scores denote a more severe impact of COPD on a patient's life.
Baseline, 6 and 12 months
Mortality
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Annual mortality rate associated with different PIF levels.
6 and 12 months
Variability and correlation of PIF
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 months
Variability of PIF over time and the correlation between PIF and other lung function measures (including FEV1, FVC, Inspiratory capacity), CAT scores, T2 markers (nasal polyps and dermatitis) and where available blood biomarkers.
Baseline, 6 and 12 months
Exacerbation rate
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Annual rate of exacerbations associated with different PIF levels
6 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Respiratory Effectiveness Group

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Boehringer Ingelheim

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Omar Usmani, MD, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London & Royal Brompton Hosp

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 14, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 25, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • REG-RES1801

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings