Comparison of VieScope vs. Macintosh Laryngoscope for Intubation in Level Cpersonal Protective Equipment Conditions
Comparison of VieScope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation Under Level C Personal Protective Equipment Conditions
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Warsaw, Poland, 02-662
- Lazarski Univeristy
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- paramedic
- consent voluntary participation in the study
- none experience in Vie Scope
- none experience in intubation with personal protective equipment
Exclusion Criteria:
- refusal to participate in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Regurgitation
intubation in regurgitation condition
|
intubation with the standard Macintosh laryngoscope and endotracheal tube 7.0 internal diameter with standard tube stylet
Other Names:
intubation with the Vie Scope laryngoscope with bougie stylet and endotracheal tube 7.0 internal diameter
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Tongue edema
intubation in Tongue edema condition
|
intubation with the standard Macintosh laryngoscope and endotracheal tube 7.0 internal diameter with standard tube stylet
Other Names:
intubation with the Vie Scope laryngoscope with bougie stylet and endotracheal tube 7.0 internal diameter
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
time to intubation
Time Frame: 1 day
|
time from pick up device to the final placement tube in trachea
|
1 day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
the degree of visibility of the glottis
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The POGO score describes how much glottic opening is visible.
A POGO score of 100% indicates visualization of the entire glottic opening from the anterior commissure of the vocal cords to the interarytenoid notch.
A POGO score of 0% corresponds with no visualization of laryngeal structures.
|
1 day
|
|
Cormack - Lehane grade
Time Frame: 1 day
|
self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading (grade 1-4)
|
1 day
|
|
success of intubation
Time Frame: 1 day
|
A failed intubation attempt was defined as an attempt in which the trachea was not intubated, or which required more than 120 seconds to perform
|
1 day
|
|
Number of optimalization maneuvers
Time Frame: 1 day
|
the number of optimization maneuvers required (re-adjustment of head position, second assistant) to aid endotracheal intubation
|
1 day
|
|
Procedure Ease of use
Time Frame: 1 day
|
self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization.
A 100% score is a extremely difficult procedure.
A Ease of use score of 1% means that procedure is extremely easy
|
1 day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- INT_PPE_2020_1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.