Vaginoscopy Compared to Traditional Hysteroscopy for Hysteroscopy Morcellation in Outpatient Clinic. A Randomized Trial
Pain Perception During Vaginoscopy Compared to Traditional Hysteroscopy for Hysteroscopy Morcellation in Outpatient Clinic: A Randomized Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
78 participants will be randomised in two groups:
- traditional hysteroscopy: under intravenous sedation, hysteroscopic morcellation is perform after speculum insertion, vaginal cleansing, and paracervical anesthesia with xylocain 1%.
- Vaginal hysteroscopy: under intravenous sedation, hysteroscopic morcellation is perform after vaginal cleansing using vaginal distension with saline solution
In addition to pain perception, other outcomes includes: complication rates, time to continue fertility treatment, time to pregnancy
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 1P1
- CHUM - Clinique Médecine et biologie de la reproduction
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- polyp or fibroid previously diagnosed by hysteroscopy
- polyp less than 2 cm
- submucosal fibroid (type 0 or 1 according to the 2011 FIGO uterine fibroid classification) less than 2 cm
- if more than 1 fibroid: total fibroid have to be less or equal 4 cm
Exclusion Criteria:
- cervical stenosis
- polyp or fibroid more than 2 cm
- pregnancy
- blood dyscrasia
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Standard hysteroscopy
morcellation hysteroscopy with intravenous sedation and paracervical bloc
|
speculum, paracervical block before hysteroscopy morcellation
|
|
Experimental: Vaginoscopy
morcellation hysteroscopy with only intravenous sedation
|
vaginal distension with hysteroscope for hysteroscopy morcellation (without speculum or tenaculum forceps)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in pain perception between vaginoscopy group and traditional hysteroscopy group
Time Frame: immediately after intervention
|
10 point visual analog pain scale: 0 for no pain to 10 for unbearable pain
|
immediately after intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in length of time of procedure between vaginoscopy group and traditional hysteroscopy group
Time Frame: immediately after intervention
|
length of time in minutes between start and end of procedure including morcellation
|
immediately after intervention
|
|
Difference in proportion of vasovagal syncope between vaginoscopy group and traditional hysteroscopy group
Time Frame: immediately after surgery
|
Presence of jerky abnormal movements or a slow weak pulse rate associated to at least one symptoms: nausea, pale skin, blurred vision, warm feeling or cold sweat.
|
immediately after surgery
|
|
Difference in proportion of uterine perforation between vaginoscopy group and traditional hysteroscopy group
Time Frame: immediatly after surgery
|
presence of one or more signs during intervention: extension of the instrument goes beyong the limitation of the uterus, loss of resistance, sudden loss of vision, direct visualisation of the perforation
|
immediatly after surgery
|
|
Difference in length of time to continue fertility treatment between vaginoscopy group and traditional hysteroscopy group
Time Frame: up to 1 year
|
length of time in months to continue fertility treatment after procedure
|
up to 1 year
|
|
Difference in length of time to pregnancy between vaginoscopy group and traditional hysteroscopy group
Time Frame: up to 1 year
|
length of time in months to be pregnant after procedure
|
up to 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Carole KAMGA-NGANDE, MD, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 19.380
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.