Influence of Pharmacist and Student Pharmacists on Medication Adherence in Community Pharmacy Setting in Underserved Population

April 12, 2022 updated by: Loma Linda University
The overall objective is to examine the influence of various services provided by the community pharmacy on patients' diabetes and diabetes-related health outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Diabetes affects approximately 30.3 million people in the U.S. and is the 7th leading cause of death (ADA 2019). Uncontrolled diabetes leads to various complications including cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, diabetic retinopathy, peripheral neuropathy, and lower extremity amputation. Estimated healthcare expenditure for individuals with diabetes is approximately $327 billion per year (ADA 2017). In San Bernardino County, the prevalence of diabetes was higher (12.4%) than the national rate (9.4%). More specifically, the federally qualified health center in which the Loma Linda University (LLU) community pharmacy serves has a diabetes prevalence rate of about 16% (HRSA 2017). To decrease risk of diabetes complications, HbA1c is recommended to be <7% in most patients; however, about 35% of the investigator's patient population have poorly controlled diabetes which is defined as HbA1c >9% (ADA 2019). Given high prevalence rates of uncontrolled diabetes in this high-risk population, it is pivotal that individuals are provided with appropriate diabetes self-management strategies, regular monitoring, and preventative care by their primary care provider to adequately control the disease. Numerous studies illustrate that clinical pharmacists improve health outcomes for chronic disease managements with medication therapy management (MTM) services in underserved patients. Additionally, team-based or coordinated care with the community pharmacist and the patient's health care providers has also demonstrated to assist with improvements in clinic outcomes of chronic diseases. Recently, combination of blister packaging and MTM services have been shown to improve medication adherence and clinical endpoints. Given the high prevalence of diabetes in this community, there is a critical need to achieve improvement in clinical diabetes outcomes possibly via monthly blister packaging and MTM services including point-of-care testing (POCT).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Bernardino, California, United States, 92410
        • Loma Linda University Pharmacy at SACHS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥18 years of age, any gender
  • Hemoglobin A1c >8.5%
  • Taking total of ≥5 medications and taking ≥2 anti-diabetes medications

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Individuals included in Inland Empire Health Plan's Complex Care Program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Other: Standard of care
None. Regular visits to primary care physician. Will measure HbA1c and blood pressure at baseline, 3, and 6 months
Experimental: Pharmacist Intervention
Other: Pharmacist and pillpack intervention
These participants will be randomized into one of the following two cohorts: standard of care (SOC) and pharmacy intervention group (blister packaging + MTM services). For pharmacy intervention (PI) group, the POCT will be used to measure HbA1c and blood pressure (BP) at baseline, 3, and 6 months during medication therapy management (MTM) service. Recommendation from MTM services will be documented in the patients' electronic medical records (EMRs) and shared with their primary care providers. For the SOC group, HbA1c and BP will be measured at the physician's office and researchers will have an access to participants' EMR.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hemoglobin A1c
Time Frame: Change between baseline and 6 months
Finger prick for HgA1c at baseline and at 6 months. Goal < 7% normal above 7% is abnormal
Change between baseline and 6 months
blood pressure
Time Frame: Change between baseline and 6 months
Blood pressure will be checked at baseline and at 6 months. Goal BP is 130/80 mmHg and above 130/80 mmHg is abnormal.
Change between baseline and 6 months
Medication adherence
Time Frame: Change between baseline and 6 months
Adherence of medication will be determined by patients picking up their medications. Patient profile will track every insurance claims for the medications. The proportion of days covered indicates the medication adherence, and it will be calculated at the end of 6 months.
Change between baseline and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Loma Linda University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 20, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 12, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 5190360

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings