Functional Intermuscular Reduction of Spasticity (MS-FIRST)

September 27, 2021 updated by: University of Oklahoma

Functional Intermuscular Reduction of SpasTicity in MS (MS-FIRST)

Investigators will use muscular dry needling in the calf of one lower extremity, followed by treadmill training with functional electrical stimulation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study will be the first to combine a novel two-pronged approach to the management of spasticity (tightness of the muscle) in the calf muscles. First, investigators will decrease spasticity in an innovative way through dry needling. Second, investigators will follow this spasticity reduction technique using external electrical stimulation applied to the calf, while the participant walks on a harnessed treadmill (for safety). The investigators believe modulating tone in the calf with dry needling will allow for improved strength with electrical stimulation, while simultaneously improving the efficiency of the muscles during walking. The investigators hypothesize that decreasing spasticity will result in enhanced gait efficiency, and lower fatigue, all while allowing the participant to meet their personal mobility goals.10 The investigators are proposing an innovative study design. Assessing changes in muscle spasticity using electromyography and the Modified Ashworth scale before and after each portion of our two-pronged intervention will enable them to understand the immediate effects of dry needling, as well as the combined effects of function electrical stimulation with with treadmill training. Following the intervention assessments with pre-post functional tests will allow us to determine long term changes. This proposal offers a unique approach to management of spasticity in people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), with the advantage of being minimally invasive and inexpensive. Results of this pilot study will inform the potential use in MS, and will allow for a larger study examining optimal intervention parameters for future use.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
16

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

People with a diagnosis of MS and spasticity

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of MS based on MRI
  2. Ability walk 25 feet
  3. Spasticity of one lower extremity

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Blood clot within the last 6 months
  2. Bleeding disorder
  3. Active cancer
  4. Botox in the lower extremities within 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
MS with spasticity of one lower extremity
A person diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis and spasticty of one lower extremity. The person must be able to walk 25 feet and cannot have had Botox in the lower extremity on the last 6 months.
Other: dry needling
dry needling followed by functional electrical stimulation and treadmill training
Other Names:
  • functional electrical stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6 minute walk test
Time Frame: up to 7 weeks
distance walked over 6 minutes assessed at the start of the study and after 6 weeks.
up to 7 weeks
25-foot walk
Time Frame: up to 7 weeks
time to walk 25 feet assessed at the start of the study and after 6 weeks.
up to 7 weeks
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: up to 7 weeks
Balance test conducted at the start of the study and after 6 weeks.
up to 7 weeks
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale
Time Frame: up to 7 weeks
patient-reported questionnaire collected at the start of the study and after 6 weeks.
up to 7 weeks
Toe taps on force plate
Time Frame: up to 7 weeks
number of toe taps in 10 seconds counted at the start of the study and after 6 weeks.
up to 7 weeks
EMG data of both lower extremities
Time Frame: up to 7 weeks
Electromyography (EMG) will be conducted at the start of the study and after 6 weeks. EMG is an electrodiagnostic technique for evaluating and recording the electrical activity produced by skeletal muscles. This is completed using electrodes that are placed on the skin, which detects the electric potential generated by muscle cells when these cells are electrically or neurologically activated. These action potentials are measured and recorded on a computer.
up to 7 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Oklahoma

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Shirley James, PhD, University of Oklahoma

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 19, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 18, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 27, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 19-21

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings