PROM Collected Via a WebApp Versus a Touch Screen Solution Among Patients With SLE

March 30, 2021 updated by: Salome Kristensen

Patient-reported Outcome Measures Collected in DANBIO Via a From Home Web Application Versus a Touchscreen in the Outpatient Clinic Among Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Randomised, Crossover, Agreement Study

A randomised, within-participants cross-over design trial including 34 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. The participants will be randomised to data registration of patient reported outcome measures (PROM) through the DANBIO webapp and thereafter via the outpatient touchscreen or vice versa.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The aim of this trial is to evaluate whether electronic reporting of PROMs through the DANBIO web application (webapp) is comparable to the outpatient touchscreen among patients with SLE.

The trial is a randomised, crossover, agreement study where 34 patients with SLE from the Department of Rheumatology at Aalborg University Hospital will be included and randomised in ratio 1:1 to:

  • Group 1: PROMs are reported through the DANBIO webapp; thereafter, the touchscreen.
  • Group 2: PROMs are reported through the touchscreen; thereafter, the DANBIO webapp.

There will be a wash-out period of 1-2 day between the two registrations to minimise carryover bias.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
34

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Denmark
      • Aalborg, Denmark, 9000
        • Department of rheumatology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 110 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed in DANBIO with SLE
  • Experience with the PROM questionnaires in DANBIO (≥ 1 previous assessments)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent or to comply with the study protocol
  • Diagnosis of SLE of ≥ 12 months
  • Does not have access to a device that can run the DANBIO webapp

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Group WT
PROM registration via the DANBIO WebApp and thereafter the outpatient touchscreen
Device: PROM registration via the DANBIO WebApp and the outpatient touchscreen in a randomised order
PROM registration via the DANBIO WebApp and the outpatient touchscreen in a randomised order
Other: Group TW
PROM registration via the outpatient touchscreen and thereafter the DANBIO WebApp
Device: PROM registration via the DANBIO WebApp and the outpatient touchscreen in a randomised order
PROM registration via the DANBIO WebApp and the outpatient touchscreen in a randomised order

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire global health
Time Frame: Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)
Evaluates global assessment of lupus activity using an NRS score from 0-10. Higher score Means worse outcome.
Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)
Time Frame: Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)
Assess the patient's physical function from 0-3. Higher score Means worse outcome.
Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)
Visual Analogue Scale for Pain
Time Frame: Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)
The patient's assessment of pain on a scale from 0-100 within the last week.The left of the scale (0) signifies the absence of pain and the right end (100) maximum pain.
Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)
Visual Analogue Scale for fatigue
Time Frame: Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)
The patient's assessment of fatigue on a scale from 0-100 within the last week. The left of the scale (0) signifies the absence of fatigue and the right end (100) maximum fatigue.
Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)
Patient Global Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)
The patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis severity) on a scale from 0-100 within the last week. The left of the scale (0) signifies the absence of arthritis activity and the right end (100) maximum arthritis activity.
Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)
Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)
Time Frame: Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)
The patient's assessment of acceptable symptom state. Consist of one question answered with "yes" or "no". The question is: ''Take into account all the ways in which your arthritis has affected you in the past 48 hours. If you were to remain for the next few months as you are today, would it be acceptable to you?"
Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)
Anchoring question
Time Frame: Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)
The patient's assessment of change in arthritis activity since last visit from much worse to much better.
Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)
SLAQ flare score
Time Frame: Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)
Evaluates presence or severity of lupus flare on a transitional scale e.g. 0 (no worsening), 1 (mild worsening), 2 (moderate worsening) or 3 (severe worsening).
Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)
SLAQ symptom score
Time Frame: Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)
Evaluates the number of lupus specific symptoms present from 0-24. Higher score means worse outcome.
Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)
SLAQ total score
Time Frame: Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)
Evaluates severity of lupus disease activity by a weighted score of the 24 lupus specific symptoms, range 0-44. Higher score means worse outcome.
Day 1 (first data registration) and day 3 (second data registration)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Salome Kristensen

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Salome Kristensen, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 25, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 25, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 30, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20200527

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Study protocol and the SAP will be published as supplementary information to the article. IPD from this trial that underlie results in a publication will be made available in clinicaltrials.gov after publication of the article.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Will be made available when the article is published

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Study protocol and the SAP will be published as supplementary information to the article. IPD from this trial that underlie results in a publication will be made available in clinicaltrials.gov after publication of the article.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Clinical Trials on PROM registration via the DANBIO WebApp and the outpatient touchscreen in a randomised order

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings