New Tools for Predicting Capillary Leak Shock During Dengue Fever (PrediDengue)

December 9, 2020 updated by: Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne
Evaluate the prognostic value of different methods (Osmometry / clinical-biological score) compared to the occurrence of capillary leak shock during dengue fever.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

On the South American continent, dengue fever progressively progresses to hyperendemia with co-circulation of different serotypes. Among the complications of dengue fever, a frequent complication is the shock linked to capillary leakage which often occurs at the time of defervescence between the 3rd or 5th day of evolution of the fever. Before that, it is difficult to identify patients who are at risk for severe forms. Patients are therefore seen regularly to monitor for the development of serious forms, which causes saturation of the health system. Despite everything, with each epidemic, the investigators observe deaths of previously healthy people, which always constitutes an important trauma for the population and for the carers. Improving the understanding of the pathophysiology of capillary leakage and the tools to predict it would be significant advances in this common tropical pathology. Thus a retrospective study of longitudinal data during the dengue 2 epidemic of 2013 made it possible to generate precise hypotheses as to the pathophysiology of the shock linked to capillary leakage. Hypoprotidemia and hyponatremia having a strong statistical association with the subsequent occurrence of shock, the hypothesis is of a progressive disturbance of the plasma osmolarity resulting in water leaks towards the interstitial sector.

These preliminary data also made it possible to develop a predictive score which must now be validated over time.

Research involving the human person, monocentric, prospective, validation

Interventional research protocol involving the human person category 2 at risk and minimal constraints

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
342

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: DRISP General Hospital of Cayenne
  • Phone Number: +594 0594395385
  • Email: cicec@ch-cayenne.fr

Study Locations

  • France
    • French Guiana
      • Cayenne, French Guiana, France, 97306

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age> = 5 years
  • Patient / parent consent
  • Exclude other pathology with capillary circulation problem (septic shock, anaphylaxis) All suspected dengue fever requiring hospitalization will be included, final inclusion being after biological confirmation (AgNS1, RT-PCR, serology).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <5 years
  • Refusal to participate
  • Unsigned consent
  • Coinfection by another agent
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Single Arm
Other: For each routine sample, an additional tube will be collected to measure the osmotic pressure in the blood and urine
Interventional research protocol involving the human person category 2 at risk and minimal constraints
Other Names:
  • Collection of biological samples : Aliquot of remnants of urine and blood for possible ancillary studies on prognostic factors for occurrence of shock due to capillary leakage during dengue
  • Systematic search for effusion done in a standardized manner with 3 ultrasound incidences: longitudinal medio axillary, longitudinal medio clavicular and transverse views of the right upper quadrant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence of a shock
Time Frame: 2 years
The primary outcome measure will be the occurrence of a shock defined by systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg in adults and <80 mm Hg in children.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Predictive value of plasma hypo-osmolarity
Time Frame: 2 years
Evaluate the predictive value of plasma hypo-osmolarity in the occurrence of shock during dengue
2 years
Validation of the clinical-biological prognostic score
Time Frame: 2 years
Prospectively validate the clinical-biological prognostic score (2013 shock score) and, if possible, improve it
2 years
Relationship between the measurements obtained by osmolarity and capillary leakage
Time Frame: 2 years
Study the relationship between the measurements obtained by osmolarity and capillary leakage measured by pleural effusion
2 years
Evaluation of the sensitivity / specificity and predictive values of osmolarity and capillary leakage
Time Frame: 2 years
Evaluation of the sensitivity / specificity and predictive values of these measures in relation to the ultrasound objectification of a pleural effusion
2 years
How long before the shock these measures (osmolarity, score) allow to predict an unfavorable evolution
Time Frame: 2 years
Specify how long before the shock these measures (osmolarity, score) allow to predict an unfavorable evolution
2 years
Association between the factor "Presence of sickle cell disease" and "occurrence of severe dengue"
Time Frame: 2 years
Study the association between the factor "Presence of sickle cell disease" and "occurrence of severe dengue"
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
European Regional Development Fund

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Mathieu NACHER, MD, PhD, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 14, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 14, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 14, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 9, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PrediDengue

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Children

Clinical Trials on For each routine sample, an additional tube will be collected to measure the osmotic pressure in the blood and urine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings