Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Supra-inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Pain Management After Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Randomized Controlled Trial

July 19, 2021 updated by: Yonsei University
Adequate pain control after total hip arthroplasty is crucial for early ambulation and patient satisfaction. The supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block has been described as a promising technique for primary total hip arthroplasty. However, one of the concerns with supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block is still the potential for quadriceps weakness that might delay ambulation. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block has been recently introduced a new technique for blockade of the articular branches of the femoral, obturator and accessory obturator nerves. PENG block is possible to provide sufficient analgesia and preserve lower limb muscle strength. The investigators will compare ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block with PENG block in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
58

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 19 years old or older, with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 1-3
  • scheduled for elective unilateral total hip arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy or intolerance to any of the drugs used in the study
  • Hepatic or renal insufficiency
  • Opioid dependency
  • Coagulopathy
  • Pre-existing neurologic or anatomic deficits in the lower extremities
  • Severe psychiatric illness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Pericapsular nerve group block
Participants receiving pericapsular nerve group block
Procedure: Pericapsular nerve group block
A curvilinear 2-5MHz ultrasound probe will be initially placed in a transverse plane over the anterior superior iliac spine and then aligned with the pubic ramus by rotating the probe counterclockwise approximately 45 degrees. In this view, the iliopubic eminence, the iliopsoas muscle and tendon, the femoral artery, and pectineus muscle will be observed. A 22-gauge, 80-mm needle will be inserted from lateral to medial in an in-plane approach to place the tip in the musculofascial plane between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pubic ramus posteriorly. A total volume of 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% will be injected.
Other Names:
  • PENG block
Active Comparator: Supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block
Participants receiving supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block
Procedure: Supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block
A linear 6-13-MHz ultrasound probe will be placed in the sagittal plane to obtain an image of the anterior superior iliac spine. The fascia iliaca and sartorius, iliopsoas, and oblique internal muscles will be identified by sliding the probe medially. After identifying the "bow-tie sign" formed by the muscle fascias, a 22-gauge, 80-mm needle will be introduced 1 cm cephalad to the inguinal ligament. Using an in-plane approach, the fascia iliaca will be penetrated and hydrodissected, separating the fascia iliaca from the iliac muscle. A total volume of 30 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% will be injected.
Other Names:
  • Supra-inguinal FICB

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric rating scale pain score
Time Frame: 1 hour after the surgery
Pain intensity at rest and during 45-degree passive flexion of the hip with the ipsilateral knee flexed naturally will be evaluated by an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
1 hour after the surgery
Numeric rating scale pain score
Time Frame: 6 hours after the surgery
Pain intensity at rest and during 45-degree passive flexion of the hip with the ipsilateral knee flexed naturally will be evaluated by an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
6 hours after the surgery
Numeric rating scale pain score
Time Frame: 24 hours after the surgery
Pain intensity at rest and during 45-degree passive flexion of the hip with the ipsilateral knee flexed naturally will be evaluated by an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
24 hours after the surgery
Numeric rating scale pain score
Time Frame: 36 hours after the surgery
Pain intensity at rest and during 45-degree passive flexion of the hip with the ipsilateral knee flexed naturally will be evaluated by an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
36 hours after the surgery
Numeric rating scale pain score
Time Frame: 48 hours after the surgery
Pain intensity at rest and during 45-degree passive flexion of the hip with the ipsilateral knee flexed naturally will be evaluated by an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
48 hours after the surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quadriceps muscle strength
Time Frame: baseline
Quadriceps muscle strength will be measured by the dynamometer
baseline
Quadriceps muscle strength
Time Frame: at 6 hours postoperatively
Quadriceps muscle strength will be measured by the dynamometer
at 6 hours postoperatively
Quadriceps muscle strength
Time Frame: at 24 hours postoperatively
Quadriceps muscle strength will be measured by the dynamometer
at 24 hours postoperatively
Quadriceps muscle strength
Time Frame: at 36 hours postoperatively
Quadriceps muscle strength will be measured by the dynamometer
at 36 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Yonsei University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 21, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 6, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 10, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 8, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 19, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 4-2020-0417

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings