Digital vs Analog Impression in Cases of All-on-4 - Prosthesis
In a Post -Covid-19 World, What is the Clinical Influence of Digital vs Analog Impression in Cases of All-on-4 - Prosthesis ?
Fifty six patients were randomly enrolled in the study. Participants were randomly stratified into two control groups and two test groups, from which conventional pick up and digital impressions were made respectively. Patients of group 1 (CIG Axial) and 3 (DIG Axial) received 4 axial implants whereas, group 2 patients (CIG Tilted), and group 4 (DIG Tilted) received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants.
All participants received hybrid dentures. Bone loss, implant loss, maintenance of prosthesis were evaluated at 6m,12m, and 24 months follow up period.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Giza, Egypt, 12451
- OctoberUMSA
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- completely edentulous patients with age range from 50-65 years.
- physically and psychologically eligible participants for implants placement.
- adequate bone to receive 4 interforaminal implants.
Exclusion Criteria:
participants were excluded if
- medical conditions that precludes implants placement
- smokers
- patients suffering from any parafunctional habits
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: (CIG Axial)
received 4 axial implants and conventional impression
|
patients received 4 axial implants and digital impression
|
|
Experimental: (DIG Axial)
received 4 axial implants and digital impression
|
received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants, and digital impression
patients received 4 axial implants and conventional impression
|
|
Active Comparator: CIG Tilted
received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants, and conventional impression
|
received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants, and digital impression
|
|
Experimental: (DIG Tilted)
received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants, and digital impression
|
patients received 4 axial implants and digital impression
received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants, and conventional impression
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
implant loss
Time Frame: 24 months
|
The implants were considered surviving if they were clinically stable and functioning without any mobility.
Failure was defined removal of implants due to loss of integration, pain, implant mobility, paraesthesia, neuropathies or psychological reasons.
Calculation of the estimated failure rate was performed by dividing the number of implant failures by the total exposure time of the implant.
The total exposure time is the interval of time the implants could be followed for the entire observation time or up to failure of the implants that were lost during the follow-up period.
|
24 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
crestal bone loss
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Standardized periapical radiographs with long cone paralleling technique using film holders were used for the assessment of crestal bone loss.
The loss of marginal bone relative to the implant shoulder at the mesial and distal of each implant was measured in mm and then the mean was calculated and statistically estimated.
A digital intraoral imaging system was used (Digora phosphor plate reader, Soredex Tuusula, Finland).
All the radiographs were scanned and then uploaded into the computer for assessing bone loss over time.
The "ImageJ" software was used to take the measurements on the computer screen.
Postoperative radiographs with the implants placed at the crest of the bone were compared with the 6,12 and 24 m radiographs.
|
24 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
maintenance
Time Frame: 24 months
|
During the follow-up period, prosthodontic (mechanical) complications for the four groups were registered and calculated according to the following events: number of screw loosening or screw fracture of the abutment, number of screw loosening or screw fracture of the prosthesis, number of framework fracture, fractured acrylic resin, number of prosthetic teeth fracture and loss of cover of access hole.
|
24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dina Elawady, Lecturer
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 5
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Edentulous Mouth
-
NCT02911038CompletedJaw Edentulous | Mouth Edentulous
-
NCT05441527CompletedEdentulous Jaw | Edentulous Mouth
-
NCT06393582Not yet recruitingDental Implants | Edentulous Jaw | Edentulous Mouth
-
NCT06693635CompletedEdentulous Alveolar Ridge | Partial-edentulism | Edentulous Jaw | Edentulous Mouth
-
NCT03674554UnknownEdentulous Alveolar Ridge | Edentulous Jaw | Edentulous Mouth
-
NCT02339194UnknownEdentulous Jaw | Edentulous Mouth
-
NCT06460103Not yet recruitingPartially Edentulous Maxilla | Partially Edentulous Mandible
-
NCT03814655CompletedPartially Edentulous Maxilla | Partially Edentulous Mandible
-
NCT07586774Not yet recruitingEdentulous Jaw | Edentulous Mouth
-
NCT03056976Completed
Clinical Trials on DIG Axial
-
NCT03585634Completed
-
NCT03468309Completed
-
NCT02102737CompletedGlucose Metabolism Disorders | Metabolic Diseases | Diabetes Mellitus | Endocrine System Diseases | Insulin Resistance
-
NCT03115164CompletedAstrocytoma | Ganglioglioma Desmoplastics and Infantile
-
NCT01493934CompletedType 2 Diabetes Mellitus
-
NCT05617339Not yet recruitingMigraine Without Aura | Migraine With Aura
-
NCT04407325RecruitingRadiography | Volatile Organic Compounds