Screening Microorganism of Cryptogenic Mechanical Pneumonia Through Next Generation Sequencing to Lung Tissue Fluid (COPandNGS)

August 30, 2020 updated by: Jin-Fu Xu, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China

Screening Microorganism of Cryptogenic Mechanical Pneumonia Through NGS to Lung Tissue Fluid

The etiology of cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP)was not clear, but previous studies have shown that in some patients, some pathogen could be detected in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and may be one of the causes of COP. This study aimed to screen the pathogenic microorganisms in BALF and lung puncture fluid of the patients with COP through the next-generation sequencing to further clarify the correlation between the incidence of COP and pathogenic microorganisms.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The cause of cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP) was unknown, but studies had shown that certain bacteria, viruses, or specific pathogens could be detected in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in some patients, and these pathogenic microorganisms may be the cause of COP. Specimens were obtained by conventional methods (sputum, blood, BALF or lung puncture fluid) for microbiological detection. Due to the influence of the quality of acquired specimens, specimen preservation and transportation which were influenced by external factors, many patients did not get good test results, which affected the diagnosis and subsequent treatment of patients. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) which could determine hundreds of thousands to millions of DNA molecules in parallel at one time, and efficiently sequence or fragment of pathogenic microorganisms. NGS had greatly improved the detection rate of pathogenic microorganisms. This study aimed to screen pathogenic microorganisms in BALF and lung puncture fluid of COP patients by NGS, and further clarify the correlation between occurrence of COP and pathogenic microorganisms.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Jin-fu XU, M.D
  • Phone Number: 8621-65115006
  • Email: jfxucn@163.com

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Jiu-wu BAI, M.D
  • Phone Number: 8621-65115006
  • Email: yv59@163.com

Study Locations

  • China
    • Please Select
      • Shanghai, Please Select, China, 200433
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200000
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai pulmonary hospital, Tongji University
        • Contact:
          • Kai xing Ai
          • Phone Number: +86-021-65115006

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The patients with cryptogenic organizing pneumonia

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient was older than 18 years old.
  2. The patient was organizing pneumonia (OP) through pathology.
  3. The patient was diagnosed as OP from clear cause through routine detection.
  4. Chest CT shows consolidation or ground glass

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient has specific characteristics of connective tissue disease or autoimmune disease.
  2. The patient has a clear other cause of OP.
  3. The patient has severe systemic diseases of heart, brain, liver, kidney and so on, and cannot tolerate invasive examination
  4. The patient disapproves of invasive testing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The percentage of microorganisms positive for cryptogenic organizing pneumonia detected by NGS
Time Frame: From 1 Dec 2019 to 1 Dec 2024
The patients with cryptogenic organizing pneumonia will be detected through electronic bronchoscopy and lung puncture. The sample will be examinated through NGS.
From 1 Dec 2019 to 1 Dec 2024

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 7, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 30, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2020040695

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings