Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis: Intra-articular Injection of Filtered Autologous Adipose Tissue Versus Placebo
Randomized Double Blind Clinical Study on the Treatment of Bilateral Knee Arthrosis: Intra-articular Injection of Filtered Autologous Adipose Tissue Versus Placebo
The purpose of the study is to assess the radiological and clinical outcomes comparing two different treatments (Filtered Autologous Adipose Tissue versus Placebo) in patients affecting bilateral knee osteoarthritis.
After be randomized, every patient will be treated in both legs, one leg with Adipose Tissue and the other one with Placebo.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
All patients who meet the inclusion criteria and giving written informed consent will be randomized.
Every patient will be treated with a single injection of Filtered Autologous Adipose Tissue in one knee and single injection of Placebo in the other, based on the randomization.
After the treatment patients will be followed up to 24 months.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Daniele Andreani, M.Sc.
- Phone Number: 0516366072
- Email: daniele.andreani@ior.it
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bologna, Italy, 40124
- Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- bilateral degenerative chondropathy of the knees showing at least a grade 2-3 kellgren-lawrence classification (absence of severe osteoarthritis)
- An overall Pain subscale score of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index between a value of 9 and 19.
- Failure, intended as the persistence of symptomatology, after at least one conservative treatment cycle (pharmacological, physiotherapeutic or infiltrative treatment);
- Ability and informed consent of patients to actively participate in the rehabilitation protocol and clinical and radiological follow-up;
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients incapable of understanding and wanting;
- Diagnosis of leukaemia, known presence of metastatic malignant cells, ongoing or planned chemotherapy;
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, Reiter's syndrome, psoriatic arthritis, gout, ankylosing spondylitis or arthritis resulting from another inflammatory disease; infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), viral hepatitis; chondrocalcinosis;
- Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus;
- Patients with uncontrolled thyroid metabolic disorders;
- Patients who abuse alcoholic beverages, drugs or medicines;
- Patients with misalignment of the lower limbs above 10 degrees;
- Body Mass Index > 40;
- Pregnant or lactating state or intention to become pregnant during the period of participation in the study.
- Patients with a history of trauma or intra-articular infiltration of therapeutic substances in the 6 months prior to screening.
- Patients who have had knee surgery in the 12 months prior to screening.
- Patients with insufficient abdominal adipose tissue, assessed by the investigator
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Filtered Autologous Adipose Tissue
based on randomization one of the two knees will be treated with a single injection of Filtered Autologous Adipose Tissue
|
Single injection of Filtered Autologous Adipose Tissue
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
based on randomization one of the two knees will be treated with a single injection of Placebo
|
Single injection of Placebo
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
It is a 0 - 100 standardized questionnaire widely used for the evaluation of patients with knee osteoarthrosis.
The questionnaire is made by three subscale: Pain (5 questions ranging from 0 - 20), Stiffness (2 questions ranging from 0 - 8) and Function (17 questions ranging from 0 - 68).
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 24 months
|
It is a 0 - 100 standardized questionnaire widely used for the evaluation of patients with knee osteoarthrosis.
The questionnaire is made by three subscale: Pain (5 questions ranging from 0 - 20), Stiffness (2 questions ranging from 0 - 8) and Function (17 questions ranging from 0 - 68).
|
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 24 months
|
|
Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC - subjective score)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Questionnaire is specific for knee pathologies.
it is composed by three subscales: Symptoms, Sport Activities and Knee Function.
(Total score 0-100)
|
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
|
Objective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC-Objective Score)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
The presence of effusions and the degree of movement of the knee are evaluated, the worst value of one of these parameters determines the final value of the IKDC degree.
There are four grades (A, B, C, D) which respectively identify a knee rated as normal, near normal, abnormal and severely abnormal;
|
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
|
Tegner score
Time Frame: Before symptoms onset, at the baseline
|
describe and assess the sport activity with a score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 means "inability" and 10 represent ability to perform "competitive sports".
|
Before symptoms onset, at the baseline
|
|
Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
tool for assessing patient satisfaction in consideration of their current degree of pain, function and daily activity.
The patient will evaluate his degree of satisfaction by answering a dichotomous closed question (yes / no).
|
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
|
EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
0 - 100 scale where 100 is the "best possible health"and 0 is the "worst possible health"
|
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
|
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) - Function
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
the scale is to expect the patient to select the number that best describes their functional disability status, from 0 to 10.
The higher the value indicated the higher the degree of disability will be.
|
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
|
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) - Pain
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
the scale requires the patient to select the number that best describes the intensity of his pain, from 0 to 10, at that precise moment.
0 means no pain and 10 means worst possible pain.
|
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
|
Kellgren-Lawrence score
Time Frame: baseline and 24 months
|
grade 0 to 4 for the assessment of the knee osteoarthritis grade, where 4 is the worst possible grade.
|
baseline and 24 months
|
|
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Time Frame: baseline and 12 months
|
evaluation of the knee joint
|
baseline and 12 months
|
|
overall judgement on the treatment
Time Frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
|
The patient must indicate the degree of satisfaction with the treatment carried out at the end of the clinical trial
|
6, 12 and 24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bianchi F, Maioli M, Leonardi E, Olivi E, Pasquinelli G, Valente S, Mendez AJ, Ricordi C, Raffaini M, Tremolada C, Ventura C. A new nonenzymatic method and device to obtain a fat tissue derivative highly enriched in pericyte-like elements by mild mechanical forces from human lipoaspirates. Cell Transplant. 2013;22(11):2063-77. doi: 10.3727/096368912X657855. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
- Koh YG, Kwon OR, Kim YS, Choi YJ. Comparative outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with platelet-rich plasma alone or in combination with mesenchymal stem cell treatment: a prospective study. Arthroscopy. 2014 Nov;30(11):1453-60. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.05.036. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
- Tremolada C, Palmieri G, Ricordi C. Adipocyte transplantation and stem cells: plastic surgery meets regenerative medicine. Cell Transplant. 2010;19(10):1217-23. doi: 10.3727/096368910X507187. Epub 2010 May 4.
- Perdisa F, Gostynska N, Roffi A, Filardo G, Marcacci M, Kon E. Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage: A Systematic Review on Preclinical and Clinical Evidence. Stem Cells Int. 2015;2015:597652. doi: 10.1155/2015/597652. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
- Bellamy N, Hochberg M, Tubach F, Martin-Mola E, Awada H, Bombardier C, Hajjaj-Hassouni N, Logeart I, Matucci-Cerinic M, van de Laar M, van der Heijde D, Dougados M. Development of multinational definitions of minimal clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptomatic state in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Jul;67(7):972-80. doi: 10.1002/acr.22538.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- AdipoBil
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis
-
NCT04975165RecruitingBilateral Knee Osteoarthritis
-
NCT02063373CompletedBilateral Knee Osteoarthritis
-
NCT04299516CompletedGonarthrosis; Primary, Bilateral | Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
-
NCT03378076CompletedBilateral Knee Osteoarthritis
-
NCT06809998RecruitingOsteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee | Osteoarthritis(Primary) | Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis | Total Knee Anthroplasty
-
NCT01931007CompletedBilateral Primary Osteoarthritis of Knee
-
NCT04353440Not yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Arthritis | Primary Gonarthrosis, Bilateral
-
NCT04364971Not yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Gonarthrosis; Primary | Gonarthrosis | Gonarthrosis; Primary, Bilateral | Knee Arthritis
-
NCT02693457CompletedOsteoarthritis | Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
-
NCT07212647CompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Clinical Trials on injection of Filtered Autologous Adipose Tissue
-
NCT03399630CompletedOsteo Arthritis Knee
-
NCT03643614Completed
-
NCT04790123Recruiting
-
NCT04834609CompletedPerianal Fistula | Adipose Tissue | Tissue Transplantation
-
NCT02529865Completed
-
NCT03803917CompletedCrohn Disease | Perianal Fistula | Tissue Transplantation
-
NCT03117608Recruiting
-
NCT07480447Not yet recruitingPain | Wound and Injuries
-
NCT04675359Not yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Chondropathy
-
NCT04321629UnknownJoint Diseases | Knee Osteoarthritis | Osteo Arthritis Knee | Knee Arthritis | Knee Pain Chronic | Knee Pain Swelling | Knee Disease