Varus Stem Positioning of a Cementless Anatomical THA. (VARABG) (VARABG)

November 26, 2020 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Varus Stem Positioning Does Not Affect Long-term Functional Outcome in Cementless Anatomical Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Varus positioning is the most common femoral malposition in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to compare the long-term results of an anatomical cementless femoral stem positioned in varus with those in neutral alignment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed for all patients who received a cementless anatomical femoral stem in THA between 1998 and 2008. After exclusion criteria applied, 127 stems had an varus axis deviated by more than 3 degrees (varus group) and 156 had an alignment between 0 and 2.9° from the femoral axis (neutral group). Survivorship rates, complications, clinical scores, thigh pain, radiological score, cortical hypertrophy and filling rate were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 10 years.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
283

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
    • Gard
      • Nîmes, Gard, France, 30900
        • CHU Nîmes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The investigators identified all patients who underwent proximal HA-coated anatomic tapered femoral stem primary THAs between October 1998 and July 2008, through our institutional total joint registry. The data were prospectively collected on the Orthowave© database. This included patients who had an uncemented ABG-2 stem (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ). The study was a test-case retrospective analysis and an institutional review board approval was obtained prior to initiation of the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients received by several senior surgeons, the same standardized posterolateral total hip arthroplasty, and the same rehabilitation protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Etiologies other than osteoarthritis (osteonecrosis, fracture, dysplasia, rheumatoïd arthritis),
  • Complex cases with additional procedure,
  • Dual-taper modular or cemented stem,
  • Incomplete preoperative data or less than one-year postoperative data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Varus group
Radiographic stem axis was assessed on standard anteroposterior hip radiographs performed at the 3-month follow-up visit. Alignment was evaluated as described by Reina et al., by the angular deviation of the anatomic femoral axis and the stem axis. The 3 degrees minimal-value was considered to be the threshold defining a varus stem.
Diagnostic test: Xray
Hip AP Xray
Neutral group
Alignment between anatomic femoral axis ans stem axis was less than 3°.
Diagnostic test: Xray
Hip AP Xray

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Long-term survival of THA with varus or neutral cementless fixation of a proximal HA-coated anatomic tapered femoral stem.
Time Frame: Survival evaluation was carried out through study completion at an average of 10 years by the surgeon.
Kaplan-Meier survivorships free of revision of the femoral component for any reason, femoral fracture and revision of femoral component for fracture were calculated and compared by log-rank test for both group.
Survival evaluation was carried out through study completion at an average of 10 years by the surgeon.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Long-term clinical outcomes with varus or neutral femoral stem.
Time Frame: Clinical evaluation was carried out through study completion at an average of 10 years by the surgeon.
Clinical status was assessed by the Harris hip score (HHS).
Clinical evaluation was carried out through study completion at an average of 10 years by the surgeon.
Long-term radiological outcomes with varus or neutral femoral stem.
Time Frame: Radiological evaluation was carried out through study completion at an average of 10 years by the surgeon.
Radiological assessment was conducted at the last follow-up in charge antero-posterior and profile X-Ray.
Radiological evaluation was carried out through study completion at an average of 10 years by the surgeon.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 5, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 26, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 26, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20.0035

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings