Comparative Study of Learning Curve for First Trimester Fetal Anomaly Scan
A Comparative Study of Learning Curve Between Two Different Levels of Proficiency for First Trimester Fetal Anomaly Scan Using ISUOG Guidelines
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bangkok, Thailand, 10400
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi hospital, Mahidol university
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Singleton pregnancy
- Maternal age ≥ 18 years
- Gestational age between 11-13 + 6 weeks by last menstrual date or ultrasound report if uncertain date
Exclusion Criteria:
- Multifetal gestation
- Miscarriage before first trimester ultrasound
- Loss to follow up at mid-trimester ultrasound scan
- Loss to follow up after birth
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: MFM staff-level operator
|
|
|
Other: MFM fellowship trainee-level operator
|
After recruitment, the participants were divided into two groups to perform first-trimester ultrasound scan by two different levels of proficiency. First group : operator has experience more than 3 years in NT scan and second trimester ultrasound scan Second group : operator has experience less than 3 years in NT scan and second trimester ultrasound scan |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of completed scans of fetal structural abnormality between two different levels of proficiency operators
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To compare the percentage of completed scans of each organ during the first trimester scan between two different levels of proficiency
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Screening time for first trimester ultrasound scans between two different levels of proficiency operators
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To compare screening time for first trimester ultrasound scans between two different levels of proficiency operators
|
3 months
|
|
Learning curve of first trimester ultrasound scans between two different levels of proficiency operators
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To compare the learning curve between two different levels of proficiency operators
|
3 months
|
|
Detection rate of fetal structural abnormality in first trimester ultrasound scans between two different levels of proficiency operators
Time Frame: 9 months
|
To compare the detection rate of fetal structural abnormality between two different levels of proficiency operators
|
9 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Bilardo CM, Chalouhi GE, Ghi T, Kagan KO, Lau TK, Papageorghiou AT, Raine-Fenning NJ, Stirnemann J, Suresh S, Tabor A, Timor-Tritsch IE, Toi A, Yeo G. ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;41(1):102-13. doi: 10.1002/uog.12342. No abstract available. Erratum In: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;41(2):240.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Update on overall prevalence of major birth defects--Atlanta, Georgia, 1978-2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008 Jan 11;57(1):1-5.
- Pangkanon S, Sawasdivorn S, Kuptanon C, Chotigeat U, Vandepitte W. Establishing of National Birth Defects Registry in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Jun;97 Suppl 6:S182-8.
- Karim JN, Roberts NW, Salomon LJ, Papageorghiou AT. Systematic review of first-trimester ultrasound screening for detection of fetal structural anomalies and factors that affect screening performance. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;50(4):429-441. doi: 10.1002/uog.17246. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
- Taipale P, Ammala M, Salonen R, Hiilesmaa V. Learning curve in ultrasonographic screening for selected fetal structural anomalies in early pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Feb;101(2):273-8. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02590-5.
- Srisupundit K, Tongsong T, Sirichotiyakul S, Chanprapaph P. Fetal structural anomaly screening at 11-14 weeks of gestation at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 May;89(5):588-93.
- Petousis S, Sotiriadis A, Margioula-Siarkou C, Tsakiridis I, Christidis P, Kyriakakis M, Mamopoulos A, Athanasiadis A, Dagklis T. Detection of structural abnormalities in fetuses with normal karyotype at 11-13 weeks using the anatomic examination protocol of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Aug;33(15):2581-2587. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1555807. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
- Nicolaides KH. Nuchal translucency and other first-trimester sonographic markers of chromosomal abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;191(1):45-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.090.
- Salvesen K, Lees C, Abramowicz J, Brezinka C, Ter Haar G, Marsal K; Board of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG). ISUOG statement on the safe use of Doppler in the 11 to 13 +6-week fetal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;37(6):628. doi: 10.1002/uog.9026. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- COA. MURA2020/303
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.