Comparing Two Different Surgical Techniques for Breast Reconstruction
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
The purpose of this study is to compare two standard techniques for breast reconstruction-the prepectoral technique and the subpectoral technique. Again, the prepectoral technique involves putting a tissue expander on top of the pectoralis muscle, while the subpectoral technique involves putting a tissue expander under the pectoralis muscle.
The standard approach used at MSK is the subpectoral technique. This study will help researchers find out whether the subpectoral approach is better, the same as, or worse than the prepectoral approach. To decide which approach is better, the researchers will look at which technique causes fewer complications after surgery (for example, infection or the need for a second surgery). Researchers are also interested in seeing which approach causes less pain and use of pain medication after surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New Jersey
-
Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States, 07920
- Memorial Sloan Kettering BaskingRidge (Consent and Followup)
-
Middletown, New Jersey, United States, 07748
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Monmouth (Consent and Followup)
-
Montvale, New Jersey, United States, 07645
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Bergen (Consent and Followup )
-
-
New York
-
Commack, New York, United States, 11725
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Commack (Consent and Followup)
-
Harrison, New York, United States, 10604
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Westchester (Consent and Followup)
-
New York, New York, United States, 10065
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (All Protocol Activities)
-
Rockville Centre, New York, United States, 11553
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Nassau (Consent and Followup)
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women aged 21-60 years
- Planning to undergo immediate two stage prosthetic breast reconstruction with TE placement as the first stage.
- Planning to undergo unilateral or bilateral mastectomy.
- Planning to undergo nipple- or skin-sparing mastectomy.
- Mastectomy weight less than 800 grams.
- Adequate mastectomy skin perfusion or patients with adequate perfusion but nonviable mastectomy skin that can be excised (≤ 4 cm) at the defect margins with otherwise adequate perfusion.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer.
- Presence of preoperative axillary lymph node metastasis.
- Presence of intraoperative sentinel node positivity.
- History of radiotherapy.
- Current smoker.
- Planning to undergo direct-to-implant reconstruction.
- BMI >35.
- Prior sternotomy.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
|
The prepectoral approach involves placing the tissue expander on top of the pectoralis muscle.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Subpectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
|
The subpectoral approach involves placing the tissue expander under the pectoralis muscle with or without acellular dermal matrix (ADM).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
major perioperative complications
Time Frame: 90 days
|
90-day major complications for tissue expanders (i.e., infection, explantation, and reoperation for mastectomy flap necrosis):
|
90 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
minor complications
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Minor complication for tissue expanders is defined as: Seroma: clinically significant non-infected fluid collection requiring either needle aspiration or drain replacement
|
90 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Evan Matros, MD, MMSc, MPH, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20-565
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.