Usefulness of Rehabilitation in Patients With Cervical Imbalance
Usefulness of Rehabilitation in Patients With Cervical Imbalance. Use of Stabilometric Platform and Motion Sensors. (Provisional Title)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Zaragoza, Spain, 50009
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Present vertigo of vestibular, neurological or cervical cause.
- The last episode of vertigo occurred less than a year ago.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Present acute musculoskeletal pathology in the lower limbs or lumbar spine.
- Present some lower limb amputation.
- Present unresolved visual pathology.
- Being active with anticancer treatment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Type of rehabilitation treatment
Depending on whether the cervical pain associated with vertigo in the patients associated pain radiating to the arms or not, treatment with conventional physiotherapy or electrotherapy was prescribed.
In addition, both groups had a control group that performed exercises at home prescribed by a physician.
|
The 67 patients attended the rehabilitation consultation where, after taking the anamnesis, they began to perform balance tests with a stabilometric platform and those patients with associated neck pain, with cervical motion sensors.
Treatment with conventional physiotherapy, electrotherapy or exercises at home was prescribed as appropriate to each one.
3 months later, the patients were examined again in consultation, using a new anamnesis, the platform and the sensors.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of patients who improve, worsen or do not present changes after rehabilitation treatment
Time Frame: 3 months passed between the first evaluation and the second.
|
It is evaluated whether the patients, after undergoing the corresponding prescribed rehabilitation treatment, are better, worse or the same as before undergoing it.
|
3 months passed between the first evaluation and the second.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- MPolo
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.