Toward High Fidelity Adaptive Radiotherapy in the Thorax
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
- To individualize the planning margins used for treatment, we will assess the impact of the different uncertainties on patient-specific planning margins. We determine the dosimetric uncertainties for patients during planning and delivery through the daily adaptive process. In so doing, we will determine the relationship between the dose distributions and the associated treatment outcomes.
- To perform retrospective clinical studies using patient data, we determine the relationship between dosimetry from plans developed using the optimized patient-specific margins (plans from (1) that are robust to uncertainties) and retrospective, clinical outcomes. This data will be used to inform daily adaptation and plan quality criteria for a prospective clinical protocol.
- To develop (with our clinical collaborators) a first-of-kind study to measure the efficacy of daily adaptive treatment with individualized planning margins, using clinical and quality of life (patient reported) outcomes, and to compare these against the conventional treatment approach, where a single treatment plan with population-based treatment margins is utilized for all treatment fractions.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
- Henry Ford Health
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer patients
- Locally advanced
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Only
- Time Perspectives: Retrospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
|---|
|
Radiotherapy
Patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The number of patients with treatment-related Grade 3 or higher adverse cardiac events as defined by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0) at 2 years
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
A set of treatment planning strategies were designed and retrospectively implemented for locally advanced, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life measures using the FACT-TOI Lung
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Dose and volume data will be collected and correlated with treatment-related side effects and quality of life data.
|
2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Yan D, Georg D. Adaptive radiation therapy. Z Med Phys. 2018 Aug;28(3):173-174. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 27. No abstract available.
- Zhong H, Siddiqui SM, Movsas B, Chetty IJ. Evaluation of adaptive treatment planning for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jun 7;62(11):4346-4360. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa586f. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
- Herschtal A, Te Marvelde L, Mengersen K, Foroudi F, Eade T, Pham D, Caine H, Kron T. Sparing healthy tissue and increasing tumor dose using bayesian modeling of geometric uncertainties for planning target volume personalization. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jun 1;92(2):446-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.01.034. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
- Dial C, Weiss E, Siebers JV, Hugo GD. Benefits of adaptive radiation therapy in lung cancer as a function of replanning frequency. Med Phys. 2016 Apr;43(4):1787. doi: 10.1118/1.4943564.
- Kim JP, Dewalt J, Feldman A, Adil K, Movsas B, Chetty IJ. Feasibility of radical cardiac-sparing, treatment planning strategies for patients with locally advanced, non-small cell lung cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Dec;23(12):e13784. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13784. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HighFidelityART
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.