RESPECT Heart Failure- RESpiratory Pattern Evaluation in Clinical Trials for HF (RESPECT)

October 20, 2022 updated by: Stuart Russell, M.D., WakeMed Health and Hospitals
The goal is to evaluate the trends in MouthLab parameters (respiration rate, temperature, pulse rate, electrocardiogram rhythm, blood pressure, oxygen saturation heart rate and basic lung function measures) in patients with decompensated heart failure and how these measurements change in response to decongestion. The research will test the ability of the MouthLab device to predict clinical decompensation in patients with known heart failure and to reduce the number of hospital readmissions based on the treatment guided by MouthLab device data.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Heart failure (HF) is becoming increasingly recognized with an estimated worldwide prevalence of >37.7 million individuals. In the United States alone, there are over 5 million patients with HF which is expected to increase to over 8 million by 2030. Despite advances in medical therapies and technology, HF remains the leading cause of hospitalization among adults and the elderly. By 2030, the medical costs of HF are expected to rise from $20.9 billion to $53.1 billion, with nearly 80% of the projected increased expenses attributes to hospitalization costs. As such, it is imperative to develop new technologies and treatment options to impact the HF epidemic.

The majority of HF hospital admissions are due to volume overload. Stiffened and/or weakened myocardium predisposes patients to the accumulation of extracellular fluid resulting in increased intracardiac filling pressures and symptoms of congestion (edema, dyspnea and orthopnea). Accurate assessment of a patient's volume status remains clinically challenging at times. While there have been technological advances in the outpatient monitoring of volume status through thoracic impedance and pulmonary artery pressure monitoring, there are no validated, non-implantable options for monitoring volume status outside of the physical exam.

Aidar Health's MouthLab device is a non-invasive, hand-held, home monitoring tool that measures multiple medical parameters such as - Temperature, Blood Pressure, Heart Rate, Heart Rate Variability, Pulse Rate, SpO2, single-lead ECG, Respiratory Rate, Breathing Pattern/Respiratory Flow Cycle Morphology, and basic lung functions (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, PEF) in 30 seconds.

The investigators believe that the MouthLab device holds the potential to identify changes in volume status through measurements such as pulse rate, oxygen saturation, respiratory flow and lung function and accurately predict decompensation in patients with chronic HF. The investigators propose the following outline of clinical studies to evaluate the utility of the MouthLab device in HF.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27610
        • WakeMed Health and Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inpatient Sub-Study Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Adults aged ≥ 18 years old
  2. Willing and able to provide informed consent
  3. Admitted within previous 24 hours with HF exacerbation requiring intravenous diuretic therapy (reduced or preserved ejection fraction)
  4. English speaking

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Currently on dialysis
  2. Patients with acute coronary syndrome
  3. Currently on hospice

  4. Have a heart transplant or left ventricular assist device

    • Outpatient Sub-Study Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Adults aged ≥ 18 years old
  2. Willing and able to provide informed consent
  3. Patients presenting to the clinic and not being admitted to the hospital, who have been admitted for a HF exacerbation within the past 6 months, OR patients being discharged from a HF exacerbation related inpatient hospitalization
  4. For inclusion in Cohort 2, patients must have Boston Scientific pacemaker or defibrillator with Heart Logic capability
  5. For inclusion in Cohort 3, patients must have implantable CardioMEMS device
  6. Patients currently on inotropes
  7. English speaking

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Currently on dialysis
  2. Currently on hospice
  3. Have a heart transplant or left ventricular assist device

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Cohort 1
Stable outpatients without implantable devices
Other: MouthLab Device
Use of MouthLab system
Other: Cohort 2
Stable outpatients with Boston Scientific pacemakers or defibrillators with Heart Logic capability
Other: MouthLab Device
Use of MouthLab system
Other: Cohort 3
Stable outpatients with implantable CardioMEMS devices
Other: MouthLab Device
Use of MouthLab system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate trends of respiration rate per minute
Time Frame: 6 months
Respiration rate measured by breaths taken per minute
6 months
Aidar Questionnaire to Evaluate Patient Perception of Heart Failure
Time Frame: 6 months
The Aidar Questionnaire will be used to determine patient perception of severity of heart failure.
6 months
Evaluate trends of temperature measured in Fahrenheit
Time Frame: 6 months
Temperature
6 months
Evaluate trends of pulse rate per minute
Time Frame: 6 month
Pulse rate
6 month
Evaluating the P wave of electrocardiogram in milliseconds
Time Frame: 6 months
P wave on electrocardiogram will be measured to determine heart rhythm
6 months
Evaluating the QRS complex on electrocardiogram in milliseconds
Time Frame: 6 months
QRS complex will be measured to determine heart rhythm
6 months
Evaluating the T wave on electrocardiogram in milliseconds
Time Frame: 6 months
T wave will be measured to determine heart rhythm
6 months
Evaluate trends of blood pressure measured in mm/Hg
Time Frame: 6 months
Blood pressure
6 months
Evaluate trends of blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) in percentage
Time Frame: 6 months
blood oxygen saturation (SpO2)
6 months
Measuring FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume) in Liters
Time Frame: 6 months
Determining Lung Function
6 months
Measuring FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) in Liters
Time Frame: 6 months
Determining Lung Function
6 months
Measuring FEV1/FVC as a ratio
Time Frame: 6 months
Determining Lung Function
6 months
Measuring PEF (Peak Expiratory Flow) in Liters/second
Time Frame: 6 months
Determining Lung Function
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
WakeMed Health and Hospitals

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 20, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 24, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 20, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1705978

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings