Clinical Evaluation of Lithium Disilicate and Hybrid Nano-ceramic Anterior Endocrowns (Randomized Clinical Trial)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt
- Cairo University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with good oral hygiene
- Patients having one or more endodontically treated molars that need prosthetic restoration.
- Molars should have enough tooth structure for endocrown restoration with minimum 3 walls with thickness not less than 1.5 mm and gingival step placed supragingival
- Fully erupted molars
- Molars free of developmental defect
- Healthy periodontium
- Absence of periapical pathosis
- Acceptable endodontic treatment and proper bone support
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with bad oral hygiene
- Patients with active periodontal disease
- Patients with missing teeth opposing to the area intended for restoration
- Patients with parafunctional habits or psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectation.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Lithium disilicate
The intervention will be: Prosthetic endocrown
|
Endocrown
|
|
Active Comparator: Hybrid nanoceramic
The intervention will be: Prosthetic endocrown
|
Endocrown
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Using Binary Visual Analogue scale (Satisfied/ not satisfied)
|
2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Shade matching
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Using the modified United States Public Health Service criteria (Modified USPHS)- categorical
|
2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sameh Sh Abou-steit, PhD, Lecturer of Fixed Prosthodontics
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- da Cunha LF, Gonzaga CC, Pissaia JF, Correr GM. Lithium silicate endocrown fabricated with a CAD-CAM system: A functional and esthetic protocol. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Aug;118(2):131-134. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.006. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
- Wang F, Yu T, Chen J. Biaxial flexural strength and translucent characteristics of dental lithium disilicate glass ceramics with different translucencies. J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Jan;64(1):71-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 May 11.
- Rosentritt M, Preis V, Behr M, Hahnel S. Influence of preparation, fitting, and cementation on the vitro performance and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM crowns. J Dent. 2017 Oct;65:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
- Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Madruga CFL, Valera MC, Borges ALS, Bresciani E, de Melo RM. Endocrown restorations: Influence of dental remnant and restorative material on stress distribution. Dent Mater. 2018 Oct;34(10):1466-1473. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
- da Fonseca GF, Dal Piva AM, Tribst JP, Borges AL. Influence of Restoration Height and Masticatory Load Orientation on Ceramic Endocrowns. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Sep 1;19(9):1052-1057.
- Schaefer O, Watts DC, Sigusch BW, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: a three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility. Dent Mater. 2012 Mar;28(3):320-6. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
- Shamseddine L, Mortada R, Rifai K, Chidiac JJ. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Aug;116(2):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.005. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
- Belleflamme MM, Geerts SO, Louwette MM, Grenade CF, Vanheusden AJ, Mainjot AK. No post-no core approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth: An up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases. J Dent. 2017 Aug;63:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
- Tzimas K, Tsiafitsa M, Gerasimou P, Tsitrou E. Endocrown restorations for extensively damaged posterior teeth: clinical performance of three cases. Restor Dent Endod. 2018 Aug 22;43(4):e38. doi: 10.5395/rde.2018.43.e38. eCollection 2018 Nov.
- Sedrez-Porto JA, Rosa WL, da Silva AF, Munchow EA, Pereira-Cenci T. Endocrown restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016 Sep;52:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
- Furtado de Mendonca A, Shahmoradi M, Gouvea CVD, De Souza GM, Ellakwa A. Microstructural and Mechanical Characterization of CAD/CAM Materials for Monolithic Dental Restorations. J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e587-e594. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12964. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
- Otto T, Mormann WH. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramic posterior shoulder crowns and endocrowns up to 12 years. Int J Comput Dent. 2015;18(2):147-61. English, German.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CEBD 37/7/22
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.