MR Imaging of the 3D Inguinal Hernia Scaffold ProFlor
A 3D Regenerative Scaffold for Inguinal Hernia Repair. MR Imaging and Histological Cross Evidence.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Palermo, Italy, 90127
- University of Palermo - Italy
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair with the 3D inguinal hernia scaffold ProFlor
Exclusion Criteria:
- all individuals who underwent inguinal hernia repair withouth the 3D inguinal hernia scaffold ProFlor
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Short term post inguinal hernia repair with ProFlor
MRI of the pelvic area in patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair with ProFlor from 1 to 3 months before to assess tissue incorporation into the 3D scaffold
|
Device follow up after inguinal hernia repair with ProFlor
|
|
Active Comparator: Mid term post inguinal hernia repair with ProFlor
MRI of the pelvic area in patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair with ProFlor from 4 to 7 months before to assess tissue incorporation into the 3D scaffold
|
Device follow up after inguinal hernia repair with ProFlor
|
|
Active Comparator: Long term post inguinal hernia repair with ProFlor
MRI of the pelvic area in patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair with ProFlor after 8 months and beyond to assess tissue incorporation into the 3D scaffold
|
Device follow up after inguinal hernia repair with ProFlor
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
tissue incorporation into ProFlor in the short term postop.
Time Frame: 1- 3 weeks post implantation
|
evidencing the quality of the biologic response in ProFlor through signal intensity assessment collected in the T1 TSE axial sequence and measured with region-of-interest application (ROI) positioned on three different zones, respectively in muscle, fat and tissue ingrown within ProFlor
|
1- 3 weeks post implantation
|
|
tissue incorporation into ProFlor in the mid term postop.
Time Frame: 4-7 months post implantation
|
evidencing the quality of the biologic response in ProFlor through signal intensity assessment collected in the T1 TSE axial sequence and measured with region-of-interest application (ROI) positioned on three different zones, respectively in muscle, fat and tissue ingrown within ProFlor
|
4-7 months post implantation
|
|
tissue incorporation into ProFlor in the long term postop.
Time Frame: 8 months post implantation
|
evidencing the quality of the biologic response in ProFlor through signal intensity assessment collected in the T1 TSE axial sequence and measured with region-of-interest application (ROI) positioned on three different zones, respectively in muscle, fat and tissue ingrown within ProFlor
|
8 months post implantation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Amato G, Lo Monte AI, Cassata G, Damiano G, Romano G, Bussani R. A new prosthetic implant for inguinal hernia repair: its features in a porcine experimental model. Artif Organs. 2011 Aug;35(8):E181-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01272.x. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
- Amato G, Romano G, Agrusa A, Marasa S, Cocorullo G, Gulotta G, Goetze T, Puleio R. Biologic response of inguinal hernia prosthetics: a comparative study of conventional static meshes versus 3D dynamic implants. Artif Organs. 2015 Jan;39(1):E10-23. doi: 10.1111/aor.12416.
- Amato G, Romano G, Puleio R, Agrusa A, Goetze T, Gulotta E, Gordini L, Erdas E, Calo P. Neomyogenesis in 3D Dynamic Responsive Prosthesis for Inguinal Hernia Repair. Artif Organs. 2018 Dec;42(12):1216-1223. doi: 10.1111/aor.13286. Epub 2018 Oct 14.
- Amato G, Agrusa A, Puleio R, Calo P, Goetze T, Romano G. Neo-nervegenesis in 3D dynamic responsive implant for inguinal hernia repair. Qualitative study. Int J Surg. 2020 Apr;76:114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.046. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- MR imaging of ProFlor
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Study Protocol
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.