The Nordic Consensus Study (NCS)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The primary objective is to evaluate the usability of the Body Assessment Tool for the nurse. The secondary objectives are to explore if the use of Body Assessment Tool has an impact on the leakage associated Quality of Life and leakage incidences for individuals living with ostomies.
Forty to fifty ostomates will be enrolled from each Nordic country (i.e. Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Finland). The users will be recruited from 5-10 clinics in each country. The evaluation will include 1 visit at the clinic and at least 1 phone call visit to the user (end-of study phone visit).
The usability of the Body Assessment Tool will be evaluated by the nurses. The user's leakage and QoL will be evaluated by the end-users.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Birte Petersen, MD
- Phone Number: +4552167100
- Email: birte@meddevhealt.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Catarina Sternhufvud, MSC
- Phone Number: +46705561097
- Email: secast@coloplast.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Humlebæk, Denmark, 3050
- Coloplast Denmark A/s
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ostomates
- Male or female ≥18years
- Leakage issues
Exclusion Criteria:
- Requires a caretaker or is unable to participate in the study
- Is pregnant or lactating
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Only
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Ostomates
Ostomates with leakage issues and stoma created at least 3 months ago
|
Assessment tool to evaluate stoma to find proper ostomy products
|
|
Stoma care nurses
Stoma care nurses from Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden who had agreed to participate.
Invitations were sent to stoma care nurses randomly selected from among those working in relatively large stoma care clinics.
|
The stoma care nurses evaluated the clinical usability of the Body Assessment Tool, which included answering the following questions: Does the tool offer value in clinical practice? Does it provide a good starting point when choosing ostomy product(s)? Does it help raise the quality of care? Participants provided their responses on a 6 point-scale (1-6), where 1 indicated the lowest satisfaction and 6 the greatest satisfaction with the tool. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluate Body Assessment Tool Based on the Nurse Evaluation Form
Time Frame: Visit 2: Week 4
|
Clinical usability evaluation of the Body Assessment Tool was based on a 6-point scale (1 being lowest satisfaction - 6 being highest satisfaction) in response to the three questions: "Does the tool offer value in clinical practice?",
"Does it provide a good starting point when choosing ostomy product(s)?", and "Does it help raise the quality of care?".
|
Visit 2: Week 4
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
QoL (Based on the Three OLI Domain Scores (Emotional Impact, Usual and Social Activities, and Coping and in Control)
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Week 0) and Visit 2 (Week 4)
|
The Ostomy Leak Impact (OLI) score comprises 22 questions, divided into the three domains: emotional impact (10 questions), usual and social activities (8 questions), and coping and in control (4 questions).
The response to each question is rated on a 4-point Likert scale: 'all of the time', 'often', 'sometimes', and 'rarely or never' with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
These responses are scored 0,1,2, and 3 respectively in the data processing.
Because the domains contain a different number of questions, the score for each was transformed to the range of 0-100 to enable comparison across the three domains; the higher the score, the better level of leakage-related quality of life.
|
Visit 1 (Week 0) and Visit 2 (Week 4)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CP339
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.