Myocardial Pathological Changes in Patients of Type 2 Diabetes With or Without PCOS Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

March 16, 2021 updated by: RenJi Hospital
The study is prepared to use CMR technology for early screening of myocardial lesions in 561 age-matched women with type 2 diabetes without PCOS, with PCOS without type 2 diabetes and with type 2 diabetes combined with PCOS, compare the differences between the two groups of cardiomyocyte injury changes, and treat and follow-up with type 2 diabetes and PCOS in accordance with the current standard treatment guidelines for type 2 diabetes and PCOS, after 3 years of follow-up we will analyse the changes in cardiomyopathy, cardiac serological indicators, and heart function indicators,which can provide theoretical basis for early clinical intervention in the future.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

So far, due to the lack of more sensitive noninvasive detection methods and indicators that suggest early cardiomyopathy, it is not clear whether type 2 diabetes combined with PCOS will lead to earlier and more progressive changes in cardiomyopathy, and whether there is a difference with type 2 diabetes alone and early cardiomyopathy in patients with simple PCOS.Compared with women with type 2 diabetes who did not combine polycystic Ovary Syndrome(PCOS) or PCOS did not combine with type 2 diabetes, patients with type 2 diabetes who combined PCOS had the characteristics of lower age of onset, longer exposure to high risk factors of CVD, and higher risk of cardiovascular disease on the basis of the dual pathophysiology of insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism.The purpose of this study is to find early cardiovascular disease of women with type 2 diabetes and PCOS and conduct early clinical intervention.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
561

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200127
        • Recruiting
        • RenJi Hospital Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Overweight/obese women with type 2 diabetes without PCOS, PCOS without type 2 diabetes, and type 2 diabetes with PCOS were expected enrolled in our study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 30-40 years old;
  2. Overweight and obese women with/without type 2 diabetes without PCOS, PCOS without type 2 diabetes, and type 2 diabetes with PCOS;
  3. HbA1C 7-9% of patients with type 2 diabetes;
  4. Increased risk of cardiovascular disease (with any one of the following risk factors: hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperuricemia, obesity, smoking);
  5. The diagnosis of PCOS is based on the 2003 Rotterdam criteria, the diagnosis of overweight/obesity is based on the WHO-WPR criteria, and the diagnosis criteria of type 2 diabetes is based on the 1998 WHO diagnosis criteria;
  6. Willing to participate in this study and sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe liver and kidney dysfunction (ALT is greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal, or Cr>132umol/l, or eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2), psychosis, accompanied by severe infection, severe anemia, neutropenia disease;
  2. Congenital heart disease, rheumatic heart disease, hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, viral myocarditis, infectious myocarditis, hyperthyroid heart disease, cardiac amyloidosis and other myocardial damage diseases, NYHA heart function classification ≥ Grade III, or the subject has had a clinical cardiovascular event in the past 3 months;
  3. Symptomatic heart failure in the past 6 months, or left ventricular ejection fraction <35%;
  4. Self-reported or medical records are type 1 diabetes, single-gene mutation diabetes, diabetes caused by pancreatic injury, or other secondary diabetes (such as diabetes caused by Cushing syndrome, abnormal thyroid function, or acromegaly) ；
  5. Pregnancy;
  6. Participated in clinical trials of other drugs within 3 months;
  7. In the past 5 years, there have been treated or untreated organ system tumors (except local skin basal cell carcinoma), regardless of whether there is evidence of local recurrence or metastasis;
  8. A history of psychoactive substance abuse, including alcohol and a history of alcohol-related illnesses in the past 2 years;
  9. The subject is allergic to the contrast agent (gadopentetate meglumine injection);
  10. The subject has claustrophobia;
  11. The subject contains metal implants that are not suitable for cardiac magnetic resonance examination;
  12. Any conditions judged by the investigator that affect enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
type 2 diabetes without polycystic ovary syndrome
The treatment of type 2 diabetes is based on the Chinese Medical Association Diabetes Branch '2017 China Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Guidelines' for lifestyle adjustment and diabetes drug treatment.The research physician decides the diabetes treatment measures of the research object; the blood sugar control goal is that glycosylated hemoglobin is less than 7%.
polycystic ovary syndrome without type 2 diabetes
The treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome is based on the '2018 Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Chinese Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines' by the Endocrinology Group of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association and the Guide Expert Group '2018 Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of endocrinology' for lifestyle and drug treatment.
polycystic ovary syndrome with type 2 diabetes
Treatment is as above.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the change level of cardiac extracellular volume (ECV)
Time Frame: 3 years
Compared with baseline, the change level of cardiac extracellular volume (ECV) in patients with type 2 diabetes without PCOS, PCOS without type 2 diabetes, and type 2 diabetes with PCOS
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in the level of troponin I (TNI)
Time Frame: 3 years
Compared with the baseline in three groups and T2DM with different phenotype of PCOS, the serum index related to myocardial injury such as change of TNI in ng/ml.
3 years
change in the level of creatine kinase isoenzymes (CK-MB)
Time Frame: 3 years
Compared with the baseline in three groups and T2DM with different phenotype of PCOS, the serum index related to myocardial injury such as change of CK-MB in IU/L.
3 years
change in the level of Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)
Time Frame: 3 years
Compared with the baseline in three groups and T2DM with different phenotype of PCOS, the serum index related to myocardial injury such as change of BNP in pg/ml.
3 years
change in the level of atrialnatriureticpeptide (ANP)
Time Frame: 3 years
Compared with the baseline in three groups and T2DM with different phenotype of PCOS, the serum index related to myocardial injury such as change of ANP in pg/ml.
3 years
change in the level of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: 3 years
Compared with the baseline in three groups and T2DM with different phenotype of PCOS, the cardiac functions change such as: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in %.
3 years
change in the level of left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP)
Time Frame: 3 years
Compared with the baseline in three groups and T2DM with different phenotype of PCOS, the cardiac functions change such as: left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in kPa/mmHg.
3 years
change in the level of output per minute (CO) in L/min
Time Frame: 3 years
Compared with the baseline in three groups and T2DM with different phenotype of PCOS, the cardiac functions change such as: output per minute (CO) in L/min.
3 years
change in the level of left ventricular diameter reduction rate (FS)
Time Frame: 3 years
Compared with the baseline in three groups and T2DM with different phenotype of PCOS, the cardiac functions change such as: left ventricular diameter reduction rate (FS) in %.
3 years
Changes in score of Minnesota heart failure quality of life scale(LiHFe)
Time Frame: 3 years
Compared with the baseline in three groups, the changes of Minnesota heart failure quality of life scale(LiHFe) in score, higher scores mean a worse outcome. (Scores ranging from 0 to 105)
3 years
Changes in score of short form 12 questionnaire(SF-12)
Time Frame: 3 years
Compared with the baseline in three groups, the changes of SF-12 in score, higher scores mean a better outcome. (Scores ranging from 0 to 65)
3 years
Changes in score of Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7(GAD-7)
Time Frame: 3 years
Compared with the baseline in three groups, the changes of GAD-7 in score, higher scores mean a worse outcome. (Scores ranging from 0 to 21)
3 years
Changes in score of Patient Health Questionnaire-9(PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 3 years
Compared with the baseline in three groups, the changes of PHQ-9 in score, higher scores mean a worse outcome. (Scores ranging from 0 to 27)
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
RenJi Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tao Tao, Dr., Renji hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 16, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • KY2020-198

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings