A U.S Post Approval Study Evaluating the SYNERGY XLV (MEGATRON) Stent System

October 20, 2023 updated by: Boston Scientific Corporation

A U.S. Post-Approval Study of the SYNERGYTM Everolimus-Eluting Platinum Chromium Coronary Stent System Evaluating the SYNERGY XLV (MEGATRON) Stent System

This is a post-market, standard of care, real-world observational study to assess the clinical outcomes of the SYNERGY XLV (MEGATRON) Coronary Stent System for the treatment of subjects with atherosclerotic lesion(s) ≤ 28 mm in length (by visual estimate) in native coronary arteries ≥3.50 mm to ≤5.00 mm in diameter (by visual estimate). This Post Approval study is a cohort associated with the Evolve 4.5/5.0 (SYNERGY LV) Post Approval Study, which is registered under ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03875651.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
        • Yale University
    • Florida
      • Clearwater, Florida, United States, 33756
        • Clearwater Cardiovascular Consultants
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Beth Israel Deaconness Medical Center
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64116
        • North Kansas City Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27607
        • Wake Medical Center
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health Sciences University
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75226
        • Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital
    • Virginia
      • Fairfax, Virginia, United States, 22042
        • INOVA Fairfax Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Eligible patients include those with atherosclerotic coronary lesions with vessel diameters that can appropriately be treated with a SYNERGY Megatron stent according to the commercially approved SYNERGY IFU and the site's local standard of care.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient requires treatment with a SYNERGY XLV (Megatron) stent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned treatment with a non-SYNERGY stent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
SYNERGY XLV (Megatron) Coronary Stent System
The SYNERGY Everolimus-Eluting Platinum Chromium Coronary Stent System (SYNERGY Stent System), manufactured by BSC, is a device/drug combination product comprised of two regulated components: a device (Coronary Stent System) and a drug product (a formulation of everolimus contained in a bioabsorbable polymer coating).
Device: SYNERGY XLV (Megatron) Coronary Stent System
The SYNERGY MEGATRON Everolimus-Eluting Platinum Chromium Coronary Stent System is indicated for improving luminal diameter in patients, including those at high risk for bleeding, with diabetes mellitus, with symptomatic heart disease, stable angina, unstable angina, non-ST elevation MI or documented silent ischemia due to atherosclerotic lesions in native coronary arteries >3.50 mm to <5.00 mm in diameter in lesions <28 mm in length.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Target Lesion Failure (TLF) rate
Time Frame: 12 Months
12-month Target Lesion Failure (TLF) rate, defined as any ischemia driven revascularization of the target lesion (TLR), myocardial infarction (MI, Q-wave and non-Q-wave) related to the target vessel, or cardiac death.
12 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical endpoints
Time Frame: At Hospital Discharge (typically 1-2 days post index procedure), and at 6 months, 12 months, 2 years
TLR rate, TLF rate (primary endpoint at 12 months), Target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate, Target vessel failure (TVF) rate, MI (Q-wave and non-Q-wave) rate, Cardiac death rate, Non-cardiac death rate, All death rate, Cardiac death or MI rate, All death or MI rate, All death/MI/TVR rate, Stent thrombosis rates (ARC)
At Hospital Discharge (typically 1-2 days post index procedure), and at 6 months, 12 months, 2 years
Periprocedural endpoints
Time Frame: At Hospital Discharge (typically 1-2 days post index procedure)
Technical success rate, Clinical procedural success rate
At Hospital Discharge (typically 1-2 days post index procedure)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boston Scientific Corporation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Robert C Stoler, MD, Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 14, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 19, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 18, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 20, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 92226704

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The data and study protocol for this clinical trial may be made available to other researchers in accordance with the Boston Scientific Data Sharing Policy: (http://www.bostonscientific.com/en-US/data-sharing-requests.html).

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings