Radiologic Assessment in Complete Mesocolic Excision for Right Colon Cancer (RACOMERC) (RACOMERC)

April 2, 2021 updated by: Prof. Antonino Agrusa, University of Palermo

Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) and Central Vascular Ligation (CVL) in Right-sided Colon Cancer: Surgical and Radiological Assessment. A Prospective Observational Study (RACOMERC)

Colorectal surgery has made progressive advances in recent years related on one hand to the implementation of diagnostic methods that allow an early diagnosis of tumors and on the other hand to the development of therapeutic options based on laparoscopic surgery. In particular, multicenter clinical trials have shown that the laparoscopic approach to colorectal cancer had a comparable or even better outcomes in terms of perioperative complications and functional recovery of patients than traditional surgery. Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) in right colonic resections is a surgical approach, of greater technical complexity, that appears to improve the oncological outcomes of these patients at the cost of an increased rate of complications. The highest rate of complications reported in the literature in patients undergoing CME was related to intraoperative bleeding due to the central vascular dissection that is performed. CT technological advances have made possible to perform CT angiography with multiplanar and three-dimensional reconstructions with the possibility of obtaining a detailed preoperative map of the vascular anatomy of these patients. CT scan was acquired immediately before contrast material injection and during arterial and venous phase. Arterial phase was obtained using the bolus tracking technique with an automated scan-triggering software. Image analysis was performed using multiplanar reformations (MPR), maximum intensity projection (MIP) and 3D volume rendering (VR) technique. The purpose of the CT was to identify three different parameters necessary for proper performance of CME and CVL and to compare preoperative observations with intraoperative evidence. All surgeries were performed by teams experienced in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The investigators evaluated:- Fascia of Fredet; vascular structures; lymph nodes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

x

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • Italy - Sicily
      • Palermo, Italy - Sicily, Italy, 90127
        • Recruiting
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "P. Giaccone" Palermo - University of Palermo
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with endoscopic diagnosis of right-sided colon cancer

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with diagnosis of right-sided colon cancer
  • patients underwent to CT angiography
  • laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and CVL.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • metastatic disease
  • palliative treatment
  • impossibility to perform CT angiography
  • patients underwent to a traditional colonic resection with D2 lymphadenectomy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Preoperative radiologic assessment of patients with diagnosis of right-sided colon cancer. The investigators evaluated: fascia of Fredet; vascular structures (ileocolic vessels; right colic artery, middle colic artery, trunk of Henle); lymph nodes.
Time Frame: Evaluation of preoperative CT scan features during enrollment of patients.
Evaluation of preoperative CT scan features during enrollment of patients.
Evaluation of preoperative CT scan features during enrollment of patients.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perioperative outcomes: intraoperative complications
Time Frame: intraoperative time
complication occurred during surgery
intraoperative time
Perioperative outcomes: postoperative complications
Time Frame: up to 30 days postoperative
complication occurred in postoperative period
up to 30 days postoperative
Perioperative outcomes: mean operative time
Time Frame: intraoperative time
operative time
intraoperative time
perioperative outcomes: rate of conversion
Time Frame: intraoperative time
rate of conversion from laparoscopy to open surgery
intraoperative time

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Palermo

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Antonino Agrusa, Professor, University of Palermo - Italy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 2, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RACOMERC 01/2021

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings