Comparison of the Decannulation Protocol With Suctioning and Capping in Severe Acquired Brain Injury Patients

October 9, 2021 updated by: Song Lu, Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University

Tracheostomy Decannulation in Severe Acquired Brain Injury: a Decannulation Protocol With Suctioning or Capping?

Single-center randomized trail focused on tracheostomized patients with severe acquired brain injury , comparing two different decannulation protocols:

  1. an assessment of readiness for decannulation that was based on suctioning frequency
  2. an assessment that was based on tracheostomy capping

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
104

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China
        • Fuxing Hospital, Capital Medical University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Within three months of onset
  • Age≥18 years old
  • GCS≥8
  • Clinical stability( defined as the absence of fever, sepsis, or active infection and hemodynamic stability)
  • Without massive pooling or silent aspiration of saliva, more than one efficient swallow per minute, adequate cough reflex were tested by gently touching the aryepiglottic region with the tip of the endoscope.
  • Passing a tracheostomy-tube de-cuff test(de-cuff the tube for 3 days without pulmonary complications.
  • Without significant airway stenosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with pending diagnostic or therapeutic procedures and were considered by the clinicians to be at risk for neurologic deterioration
  • Medical history of severe respiratory system or heart disease
  • Neuromuscular disease other than ICU-acquired weakness, or tracheostomy for airway control
  • Don't get informed consent from patient or guardian

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: control group
In the control group, the decision to decannulate was based on a 48-hour capping trial.
Experimental: intervention group
In the intervention group, the decision to decannulate was based on suctioning frequency.
Procedure: the Decannulation Protocol With Suctioning
In the intervention group, the decision to decannulate was based on suctioning frequency. Patients underwent decannulation when they had had no more than two aspirations every 8 hours during during a 24-hour period. Patients in this group did not undergo capping trials.
Other Names:
  • the Decannulation Protocol With Capping

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the time to decannulation
Time Frame: From the date of randomization to decannulation, and the patients will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 months
the time from randomization to actual decannulation
From the date of randomization to decannulation, and the patients will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of decannulation failure
Time Frame: within 1 week after decannulation
reintubation within 1 week after decannulation
within 1 week after decannulation
high dependency unit length of stay
Time Frame: From the date of high dependency unit admission to transferring to rehabilitation ward, and the patients will be followed for the duration of high dependency unit stay, an expected average of 2 months
the time from high dependency unit admission to rehabilitation ward
From the date of high dependency unit admission to transferring to rehabilitation ward, and the patients will be followed for the duration of high dependency unit stay, an expected average of 2 months
Rate of respiratory infections
Time Frame: From the date of high dependency unit admission to hospital discharge, and the patients will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 months
post decannulation respiratory infections rate in each study group
From the date of high dependency unit admission to hospital discharge, and the patients will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 months
Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOS) six months after the acute brain injury
Time Frame: follow-up six months after discharge
The GOS is a brief descriptive outcome scale(from 0 point to 29 points, higher score means worse outcome). GOS six months after discharge to asess the prognosis of the patient
follow-up six months after discharge
Functional Independence Measure(FIM) six months after the acute brain injury
Time Frame: follow up six months after discharge
The FIM is an 18-item ordinal scale, is viewed as most useful for assessment of progress during inpatient rehabilitation（from 18 points to 126 points, higher score means better outcome）.
follow up six months after discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Yong Wang, Rehabilitation medicine center, Fuxing hospital, capital medical university

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 9, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • songlu20210320

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

all IPD that underlie results in a publication are to be shared

IPD Sharing Time Frame

1 year after publication

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings