Prognostic Factors for Work Disability in Patients With Chronic Widespread Pain and Fibromyalgia.

August 1, 2022 updated by: Henning Bliddal, Frederiksberg University Hospital

Prognostic Factors for Work Disability in Patients With Chronic Widespread Pain and Fibromyalgia: Protocol for a Cohort Study

Introduction:

The association between chronic widespread pain (CWP) and disability is well-established. Although research support large inter-individual differences in functional outcomes, limited studies are available on the socio-economic consequences of offering stratified treatment based on prognostic factors. Identification of predictors of long-term functional outcomes such as work disability as a critical consequence, could assist early and targeted personalised interventions. The primary objective of this cohort study is to identify prognostic factors for the primary endpoint work status (employed and working vs not working) in patients with CWP assessed 3- years from baseline, i.e. at referral for specialist care.

Methods and analyses:

Data are collected at the diagnostic unit at Department of Rheumatology, Frederiksberg Hospital. The first 1,000 patients >=18 years of age registered in a clinical research database (DANFIB registry) with CWP either "employed and working" or "not working" will be enrolled. Participants must meet the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 definition of CWP, i.e. pain in all four body quadrants and axially for more than three months and are additionally screened for fulfilment of criteria for FM. Clinical data and patient-reported outcomes are collected at referral (baseline) through clinical assessment and electronic questionnaires. Data on the primary endpoint work status at baseline and 3- years from baseline will be extracted from the Integrated Labour Market Database, Statistics Denmark and the nationwide Danish DREAM database. Prognostic factor analysis will be based on multivariable logistic regression modelling with the dichotomous work status as dependent variable.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

By using prognostic factor research, the purpose is to understand and improve future outcomes in patients with CWP. Identification of prognostic factors for long-term functional outcomes, including work disability, could assist tailoring and timing the therapeutic decision for specific patients and potentially optimise functional outcomes compared with offering standardised (i.e. ignorant) intervention programs to patients with CWP.

The results from this cohort study are anticipated to contribute with relevant knowledge that may be used to guide future intervention matching and delivery of stratified interventions based on prognostic classification.

Study design:

The study is designed as a clinical cohort study enabling multivariable logistic regression modelling of data from the large Danish DANFIB cohort of CWP patients with the primary aim assessed after 3- years.

Setting:

Data collection takes place in a specialised clinical care setting at the diagnostic unit at Department of Rheumatology, Frederiksberg Hospital. Here patients presenting with CWP, either as their primary pain problem or secondary to other established rheumatic disease, have been offered clinical assessment and screening for CWP since 1st of January 2018.

The electronic data collection is accessed via touchscreens and data are exported to a designated clinical research database (the DANFIB registry). Data extracted from electronic patient files, including findings at clinical examination (manual TP count), are also integrated into the DANFIB registry. A protocol outlining the content and objectives of the DANFIB registry can be accessed online.The DANFIB registry will serve as point of departure for the current cohort study.

Participants:

The first 1,000 patients consecutively registered in the DANFIB registry with CWP independent of working status. Participant inclusion is expected to be completed by December 2021. Informed consent will be obtained for all participants when registered in the DANFIB registry.

Data sources:

Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics and individual labour market status assessed at baseline will be extracted from the DANFIB registry. Data on the primary endpoint work status ("employed and working" or "not working") at baseline and again 3- years from baseline will be extracted from the Integrated Laboure Market Database at Statistics Denmark and the nationwide Danish DREAM database.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Chronic widespread pain (CWP) is prevalent in the background population with an estimated prevalence of about 10% and represents a major clinical challenge due to the complexity of the disease. Apart from pain and other centrally mediated symptoms, CWP is strongly associated with disability affecting activities of daily living (ADL), incapacity for normal employment and poor social participation. Fibromyalgia (FM) is the best characterised subset of patients presenting with CWP and is by many considered to represent the upper end of a pain severity spectrum, i.e. associated with greater disease burden and higher levels of disability, in comparison to patients with CWP not fulfilling FM disease criteria or more localized pain conditions.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

participants must:

  • be over 18 years of age
  • able to understand and read Danish
  • have retrievable data in the DANFIB registry

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no consent
  • do not read and understand Danish
  • non-retrievable data in the DANFIB registry
  • any form of pension.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Work status on the overall cohort
Time Frame: 3 years
To reveal prognostic factors, among the cohort of CWP patients, that are associated with the primary endpoint work status (employed and working vs not working) assessed after 3- years.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Work status on those employed and working at baseline
Time Frame: 3 years
Identification of prognostic factors for work status (employed and working vs not working) after 3- years in patients with CWP, who are employed and working at baseline.
3 years
Work status on those not working at baseline
Time Frame: 3 years
III. identification of prognostic factors for work status (employed and working vs not working) after 3- years in patients with CWP, who are not working at baseline.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Frederiksberg University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Pernille H. Duhn, dr., Parker Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 1, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PDH4

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings