Ultrasound Grayscale Analysis in ARDS covid19 (Graycovid)

April 26, 2021 updated by: Davide Chiumello, University of Milan

Qualitative Muscular Ultrasound in covid19 ARDS Patients

Recent evidence regarding the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) is growing in describing the characteristics of this disease, with main focus on lung morphology. Few data are available regarding the peripheral and respiratory muscular characteristics. Using a ultrasound greyscale analysis, It Is possibile to evaluated the muscle quality.

The hypothesis of this studi is that a combined assessment of respiratory (i.e., intercostal and diaphragm) and peripheral (i.e., quadriceps) muscles quantity (as measured by thickness) and quality (as assessed by greyscale analysis), would reflect the severity of illness. Thus,the aims of this study are to assess if the quality characteristics of parasternal intercostal, diaphragm and quadriceps muscles of ICU COVID19 patients influenced the outcomes and are correlated with other variables, such as fluid or protein balance, or indexes of inflammation

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Up to 30% of the patients affected by the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) may develop an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which requires in the majority of patients a respiratory support with non-invasive mechanical ventilation and, very often, the intubation . Recent evidence is growing in describing the characteristics of this disease, with main focus on lung morphology. Therapeutic strategies implemented for their management may often lead to short-term muscular and functional alterations resulting in ICU-Acquired weakness. These lead to long-term disabilities expressing through dependence and quality of life impairment of survivors. Indeed, few data are still available regarding the peripheral and respiratory muscular characteristics, mainly because this investigation is usually confined in more advance stages of disease. Muscular ultrasonography allows visualization and classification of muscle characteristics which may be described besides muscles' thickness with their echogenicity. In fact, lean muscle tissue has a low echogenicity, whereas intramuscular fat and connective tissue are characterized by a high echogenicity.

Using a greyscale analysis, the total muscle echo-intensity may in fact be quantified. The assumption is that the higher the mean pixel intensity of a muscle region of interest, the lower the muscle quality (i.e., more intramuscular fat or connective tissue) and thus its inhomogeneity. Muscle echogenicity has already been investigated during critical illness, although its modifications over the time and its associated histopathological characteristics remain to be determined. In fact, inflammation and infection as well as fluid shifts may substantially contribute to the increment in muscular inhomogeneity. Few data are available regarding the characteristics of respiratory muscle ultrasound quality during critical illness, as most of the study restricted this methodology to the analysis of peripheral muscles in the detection of ICU acquired weakness. Recently, the parasternal intercostal muscles and the diaphragm have been investigated together in the critical care setting as they represent the easiest accessible respiratory muscles to be investigated by ultrasound .

The investigators hypothesized that a combined assessment of respiratory (i.e., intercostal and diaphragm) and peripheral (i.e., quadriceps) muscles quantity (as measured by thickness) and quality (as assessed by greyscale analysis), would reflect the severity of illness. Thus,the aims of this study are to assess if the quality characteristics of parasternal intercostal, diaphragm and quadriceps muscles of ICU COVID19 patients influenced the outcomes and are correlated with other variables, such as fluid or protein balance, or indexes of inflammation

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Milan, Italy, 20142
        • ASST-Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Ards covid19 icu patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- intubated patients with confirmed infection by SARS COV 2 and diagnosis of ARDS

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age less than 18 years, history of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pregnancy, failure to perform respiratory muscle ultrasound

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Grayscale and mortality
Time Frame: One year
assess if the muscular grayscale of parasternal intercostal, diaphragm and quadriceps muscles of ICU COVID19 patients influenced the outcomes
One year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Grayscale and inflammation
Time Frame: One year
assess if the muscular grayscale characteristics of parasternal intercostal, diaphragm and quadriceps muscles of ICU COVID19 patients are correlated with other variables, such as fluid or protein balance, or indexes of inflammation
One year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Milan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 21, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 21, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 26, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Umilan1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Muscular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings