Patient Satiety as an Indicator of Stomach Contents and Fluid Volume

July 24, 2022 updated by: Peter Van de Putte, Imeldaziekenhuis

Patient Satiety as an Indicator of Stomach Contents and Fluid Volume: an Observational Prospective Study

This research proposal aims to investigate the correlation between a) the hunger feeling as measured by a ten point scale and b) total gastric fluid volumes and content as measured with gastric PoCUS in fasted, healthy subjects > 18 of age, scheduled for elective surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

An ultrasound exam will be performed before induction of anaesthesia. GUS results from selected patients will be systematically acquired and assessed following an algorithm (Appendix Ia). The ultrasound results will be collected on a standardized form (Appendix IIa). The technique is performed in the supine and right lateral decubitus position (Appendix Ib) and only by anesthesiologists with sufficient experience with ultrasound and the technique. The patient will be asked to indicate his/her satiety on a predetermined ten-point scale. Patient data and satiety score will be collected on a standardized form (Appendix IIb). The scanning anaesthesiologist is blinded to the result of the questionnaire.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
501

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Bonheiden, Belgium, 2820
        • Imeldaziekenhuis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy adult patients scheduled for elective surgery that fit inclusion criteria

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - Age ≥ 18 years
  • Fasted according to national guidelines
  • Elective surgery
  • ASA physical status I-II
  • Ability to assume both supine and right lateral decubitus position.
  • Able to understand and to sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Previous esophagus and gastric surgery, hiatal hernia, gastric cancer.
  • Pregnancy
  • Failure of GUS (defined as failure to visualize the antrum)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Fasted adult patients for elective surgery
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Fasted according to national guidelines
  • Elective surgery
  • ASA physical status I-II
  • Ability to assume both supine and right lateral decubitus position.
  • Able to understand and to sign informed consent
Diagnostic test: Gastric ultrasound
An ultrasound exam will be performed before induction of anaesthesia. GUS results from selected patients will be systematically acquired and assessed following an algorithm (Appendix Ia). The ultrasound results will be collected on a standardized form (Appendix IIa). The technique is performed in the supine and right lateral decubitus position (Appendix Ib) and only by anesthesiologists with sufficient experience with ultrasound and the technique. The patient will be asked to indicate his/her satiety on a predetermined ten-point scale.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the correlation between total gastric fluid volume in millilitres and a ten-point (0-10) satiety scale.
Time Frame: Before surgery
total gastric fluid volumes are measured with gastric point-of-care ultrasound, satiety is measured with a 0 to 10 scale. Zero stands for no satiety ( very hungry, thirsty), ten stands for fully satisfied ( no hunger or thirst).
Before surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the correlation between the Perlas grading scale ( 0,1,2) and a ten-point (0-10) satiety scale.
Time Frame: Before surgery
the Perlas grading scale is a semi-quantitative scale where 0 stands for no fluid appreciated in the gastric antrum with gastric ultrasound in both the supine and right lateral decubitus postion (RLD), grade 1 stands for fluid appreciated in the RLD only, grade 2 stands for fluid appreciated in both the supine and RLD position. This will be correlated to the abovementioned satiety scale.
Before surgery
the correlation between the type of gastric content ( no content, fluid content, solid content) and a ten-point (0-10) satiety scale
Time Frame: before surgery
gastric ultrasound will reveal whether the stomach is empty, contains fluid or solid content. This will be correlated to the abovementioned satiety scale.
before surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Imeldaziekenhuis

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Peter Van de Putte, MD PhD, Imeldaziekenhuis

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 5, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 31, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 24, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Imelda Anesth2021-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings