Effectiveness of Various Electrotherapy Methods in Treating People With Cervical Spine Pain Syndrome.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
- Other: Kinesiotherapy combined with electrotherapy (Convenctional TENS method).
- Other: Kinesiotherapy combined with electrotherapy (Pseudo-acupuncture TENS method).
- Other: Kinesiotherapy combined with electrotherapy (Trabert ultrastimulation method)
- Other: Kinesiotherapy combined with placebo electrotherapy
Detailed Description
Study participants will be tested:
- Before a series of electrotherapy treatments.
- 7 to 10 days after the end of electrotherapy.
3 months after the end of electrotherapy. The study will use
- a self-authored survey taking into account: basic personal data (age, gender, value and BMI, lifestyle and degree of load on the cervical spine), information on the nature, intensity and frequency of the presence of pain in the spine cervical system, taking into account possible adverse reactions
- a questionnaire for subcjective assessment of the state of the spine Neck Disability Index,
- measuring the tone of the vertebral muscles in the cervical (myotonometer),
- a visual analog scale used to assess the severity of symptoms (Visual Analog Scale -VAS) Intervention;
- irradiation of the neck area with a sollux lamp with a blue filter
- individual exercises conducted according to the prepared author's mobility improvement program
electrotherapy treatments:
- Trabert currents
- TENS currents (conventional)
- TENS currents (pseudo-acupuncture)
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Jolanta Zwolińska, PhD
- Phone Number: 505095199
- Email: jolantazwolinska@op.pl
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Paulina Sałaga
- Phone Number: 731275361
- Email: paulina.salaga@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Podkarpackie
-
Rzeszów, Podkarpackie, Poland, 35-310 Rzeszów
- Recruiting
- Laboratorium Czynników Fizykalnych w Rehabilitacji w Przyrodniczo-Medycznym Centrum Badań Innowacyjnych Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
-
Contact:
- Jolanta Zwolińska, PhD
- Phone Number: 505095199
- Email: jolantazwolinska@op.pl
-
Contact:
- Lidia Perenc, prof.drhab.
- Phone Number: 722015220
- Email: lperenc@ur.edu.pl
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- informed written consent of the patient to participate in the study
- no contraindications to electrotherapy in the area of the cervical spine;
Exclusion Criteria:
- poor tolerance of electrotherapy treatments;
- breaks between consecutive treatments longer than 3 days;
- failure to complete a series of kinesiotherapy and electrotherapy treatments;
- use of any stimulants during the observation period.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Conventional TENS group
One of the four groups created during randomization will undergo a unified program of kinesiotherapy and electrotherapy (Conventional TENS method).
|
One of the four groups created during randomization will undergo a unified program of kinesiotherapy and electrotherapy (Conventional TENS method).
|
|
Experimental: Pseudo-acupuncture TENS group
One of the four groups created during randomization will undergo a unified program of kinesiotherapy and electrotherapy (Pseudo-acupuncture TENS method).
|
One of the four groups created during randomization will undergo a unified program of kinesiotherapy and electrotherapy (Pseudo-acupuncture TENS method).
|
|
Experimental: Trabert ultrastimulation group
One of the four groups created during randomization will undergo a unified program of kinesiotherapy and electrotherapy (Trabert ultrastimulation method).
|
One of the four groups created during randomization will undergo a unified program of kinesiotherapy and electrotherapy (Trabert ultrastimulation method).
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group
One of the four groups created during randomization will undergo a unified program of kinesiotherapy and placebo electrotherapy.
|
One of the four groups created during randomization will undergo a unified program of kinesiotherapy and placebo electrotherapy.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Neck Disability Index
Time Frame: 1. Before a series of electrotherapy treatments.
|
A questionnaire for subcjective assessment of the state of the spine.
|
1. Before a series of electrotherapy treatments.
|
|
Neck Disability Index
Time Frame: 2. 7 to 10 days after the end of electrotherapy.
|
A questionnaire for subcjective assessment of the state of the spine.
|
2. 7 to 10 days after the end of electrotherapy.
|
|
Neck Disability Index
Time Frame: 3. 3 months after the end of electrotherapy.
|
A questionnaire for subcjective assessment of the state of the spine.
|
3. 3 months after the end of electrotherapy.
|
|
Myotonometer
Time Frame: 1. Before a series of electrotherapy treatments.
|
Measuring the tone of the vertebral muscles in the cervical.
|
1. Before a series of electrotherapy treatments.
|
|
Myotonometer
Time Frame: 2. 7 to 10 days after the end of electrotherapy.
|
Measuring the tone of the vertebral muscles in the cervical.
|
2. 7 to 10 days after the end of electrotherapy.
|
|
Myotonometer
Time Frame: 3. 3 months after the end of electrotherapy.
|
Measuring the tone of the vertebral muscles in the cervical.
|
3. 3 months after the end of electrotherapy.
|
|
Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 1. Before a series of electrotherapy treatments.
|
A Visual Analog Scale used to assess the severity of symptoms.
It enables the Patient to fine-tune the pain level on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain at all and 10 is the maximum imaginable.
|
1. Before a series of electrotherapy treatments.
|
|
Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 2. 7 to 10 days after the end of electrotherapy.
|
A Visual Analog Scale used to assess the severity of symptoms.
It enables the Patient to fine-tune the pain level on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain at all and 10 is the maximum imaginable.
|
2. 7 to 10 days after the end of electrotherapy.
|
|
Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 3. 3 months after the end of electrotherapy.
|
A Visual Analog Scale used to assess the severity of symptoms.
It enables the Patient to fine-tune the pain level on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain at all and 10 is the maximum imaginable.
|
3. 3 months after the end of electrotherapy.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Lidia Perenc, docent prof, University of Rzeszow
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cohen SP. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Feb;90(2):284-99. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.008.
- Martimbianco ALC, Porfirio GJ, Pacheco RL, Torloni MR, Riera R. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 12;12(12):CD011927. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011927.pub2.
- Martins-de-Sousa PH, Guimaraes Almeida MQ, da Silva Junior JM, Santos AS, Costa Araujo GG, de Oliveira Pires F, Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes CA, Koga Ferreira VT, Dibai-Filho AV. Program of therapeutic exercises associated with electrotherapy in patients with chronic neck pain: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020 Jan;24(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
Helpful Links
- Review of clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of exercise therapy and electrotherapy.
- In the study included adults with chronic neck pain (lasting > 12 weeks) that compared TENS alone or in combination with other treatments versus active or inactive treatments. The primary outcomes were pain, disability and adverse events.
- The objective of this study will be to evaluate the clinical effects of adding high- and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in a program of specific therapeutic exercises for the treatment of patients with chronic neck pain.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Urzeszow Club of Physical
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.