Therapeutic Response of Cannabidiol in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Cannabidiol (CBD) in Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Study Coordinator
- Phone Number: 310-825-9956
- Email: vranganath@mednet.ucla.edu
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
- UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Meet the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) 2010 Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Disease activity score (DAS28) >= 3.2
- Age >= 18
- Stable RA therapy for 12 weeks prior to baseline
- Power Doppler Score >= 5 (for the PDUS 34 joint score)
- Must use at least one highly effective method of contraception
- Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior exposure to cannabis <= 28 days prior to baseline
- Current diagnosed substance use disorders (including Alcohol Use Disorder)
- Moderate (Child-Pugh B) or severe (Child-Pugh C) hepatic impairment
- Chronic infections
- >10mg of prednisone daily use
- Daily use of central nervous system (CNS) depressant medications (e.g. sedatives, hypnotics [zolpidem, temazepam, alprazolam, lorazepam, diphenhydramine etc.])
- Women who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or breast feeding
- Sexually active subjects and their partners who are of childbearing potential (ie, neither surgically sterile nor postmenopausal) and not agreeing to use adequate contraception
- Deemed unsafe by the investigator
- History of an allergic reaction or adverse reaction to cannabis is exclusionary.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants will take capsules containing medium chain triglyceride (MCT) oil
|
MCT oil capsules as placebo for CBD
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: 200mg CBD twice daily
Participants will take capsules containing cannabidiol amounting to 200mg CBD twice daily
|
200mg twice daily via 50mg capsules
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: 400 mg CBD twice daily
Participants will take capsules containing cannabidiol amounting to 400mg CBD twice daily
|
400mg twice daily via 50mg capsules
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28/ESR)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 Weeks
|
The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
The index includes swollen joint counts (SJC) and tender joint counts (TJC), both scored 0-28 (higher scores indicate higher disease activity), as well as acute phase response (APR) determined as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and general health (GH), both scored 1-100 (higher scores indicate higher disease activity).
DAS28 was calculated according to the following formula: DAS28 equals (=) [0.56 multiplied by (*) the square root (√) of TJC] plus (+) [0.28 * √ of SJC] + (0.70 * the natural logarithm (ln) ESR in millimeters per hour (mm/h)] + [0.014 * GH in mm visual analogue assessment (VAS)].
A negative change from randomization indicated improvement.
|
Baseline, 12 Weeks
|
|
Tolerability as assessed by participant attrition
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Tolerability will be evaluated based on the number of participants that drop out due to treatment emergent adverse events or serious adverse events.
|
12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Power Doppler Synovitis Score (PDUS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
|
34 joints will be evaluated using a 0 to 3 point scale for each joint and the sum of these represents PDUS.
PDUS ranges from 0 to 102.
Scores of 0 indicate the least amount of inflammation of the joint while scores of 3 indicate the most amount of inflammation.
A higher value of the total score for PDUS represents more severe disease level.
|
Baseline, 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Grey Scale Synovial Hypertrophy Score (GSUS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
|
34 joints will be evaluated using a 0 to 3 point scale for each joint and the sum of these represents GSUS.
GSUS ranges from 0 to 102.
Scores of 0 indicate the least amount of inflammation of the joint while scores of 3 indicate the most amount of inflammation.
A higher value of the total score for GSUS represents more severe disease level.
|
Baseline, 12 weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in inflammatory cytokine and chemokine concentrations
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
|
Inflammatory cytokines and chemokine concentrations from plasma will be evaluated using multiplex cytokine array.
|
Baseline, 12 weeks
|
|
Change in white blood cell (WBC) subset percentages
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
|
WBC subset percentages will be assessed via flow cytometry.
|
Baseline, 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
|
CDAI was derived as the sum of the following: tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), participant global assessment (PGA) of disease activity, and physician assessment of disease activity.
TJC and SJC were taken as the number of tender and swollen joints, respectively, out of 28 assessed joints.
PGA and physician assessment of disease activity were scored 0-100 millimeters (mm) and rounded to the nearest centimeter (cm) on a visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater perceived disease activity.
The total CDAI score range is 0-76, where higher scores indicate increased disease activity.
|
Baseline, 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
|
The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported assessment of physical function that includes 20 items in eight categories representing a comprehensive set of functional activities, including dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities.
Patients are asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3).
Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst), with a higher score representing a high-dependency disability.
|
Baseline, 12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Veena Ranganath, MD, MS, University of California, Los Angeles
- Principal Investigator: Ziva Cooper, PhD, University of California, Los Angeles
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 19-01551
- P64-01-003 (Other Grant/Funding Number: CMCR)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.