GlideSheath Slender® Versus Conventional 5Fr Arterial Sheath in Coronary Angiography Through the Distal Radial Artery
Randomized Comparison of GlideSheath Slender® Versus Conventional 5Fr Arterial Sheath in Coronary Angiography Through the Distal Radial Artery (Anatomical Snuffbox)
Transradial approach has become the default arterial access for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), mainly due to lower incidence of bleeding compared to transfemoral access.1 However, TRA is not deprived of local access site complications such as radial artery occlusion (RAO), occurring in approximately 5.2% of patients, compartment syndrome, pseudoaneurysm, hematoma, and arteriovenous fistula. Recently, a novel approach has been proposed, the access through the distal radial artery (distal transradial access, dTRA), located in the anatomical snuffbox. Initial studies regarding the dRA have shown feasibility and benefits, including shorter hemostasis time, fewer local access site complications and potentially lower incidence of RAO.
GlideSheath Slender is a novel sheath which has a hydrophilic coating and is made of a thinner material than traditional sheaths. As a result, the external diameter of the 5 Fr GlideSheath Slender sheath is 1 Fr lower compared with conventional arterial sheaths.
The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the use of the Slender sheath affects the time of hemostasis, sheath insertion time, crossover rate to conventional radial access, pain associated with the procedure and incidence of local access site complications (RAO, distal radial artery occlusion, fistula, hematoma) in patients undergoing diagnostic angiography through the distal radial artery.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients fulfilling the enrollment criteria will be randomized 1:1 to GlideSheath Slender versus conventional 5Fr arterial sheath for access through the distal radial artery (dTRA). In case an interventional procedure is required then the initial sheath will be exchanged to a larger sheath according to the circumstances of the case and the patient will not be included in the analysis.
For randomized patients sheath insertion time, necessity for crossover to conventional radial access, pain associated with the procedure (visual pain scale) and occurrence of hematoma will be recorded. Follow-up ultrasound 7-10 days after the procedure for detection of RAO, distal radial artery occlusion and fistula formation will be performed.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Achaia
-
Patras, Achaia, Greece, 26504
- University Hospital of Patras
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Indication for coronary angiography
- Age>18 years
- Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-palpable right radial artery
- Prior CABG
- STEMI
- Prior right transaradial intervention within the previous 2 months
- Hemodynamic instability
- Anatomical restrictions (fistula orthopaedic problems, etc)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: GlideSheath Slender 5Fr arterial sheath
Placement of GlideSheath Slender 5Fr arterial sheath for diagnostic angiography through the distal radial artery (anatomical snuffbox).
|
Placement of GlideSheath Slender 5Fr arterial sheath for coronary angiography through the distal radial artery (anatomical snuffbox).
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional 5Fr arterial sheath
Placement of Conventional 5Fr arterial sheath arterial sheath for diagnostic angiography through the distal radial artery (anatomical snuffbox).
|
Placement of conventional 5Fr arterial sheath for coronary angiography through the distal radial artery (anatomical snuffbox).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Rate of successful hemostasis at 30 minutes after sheath removal
Time Frame: At 30 minutes after sheath removal
|
At 30 minutes after sheath removal
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Crossover rate to conventional radial access
Time Frame: During the procedure
|
During the procedure
|
|
|
Pain associated with the procedure (visual analog scale, VAS)
Time Frame: During the procedure
|
0-10, 0: no pain, 10: worst pain possible
|
During the procedure
|
|
Rate of hematoma modified EASY class≥II
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after hemostatic device removal
|
Up to 24 hours after hemostatic device removal
|
|
|
Rate of forearm radial artery occlusion
Time Frame: 7-10 days after the coronary angiography
|
7-10 days after the coronary angiography
|
|
|
Rate of distal radial artery occlusion
Time Frame: 7-10 days after the coronary angiography
|
7-10 days after the coronary angiography
|
|
|
Rate of fistula formation
Time Frame: 7-10 days after the coronary angiography
|
7-10 days after the coronary angiography
|
|
|
Rate of pseudoaneurysm formation
Time Frame: 7-10 days after the coronary angiography
|
7-10 days after the coronary angiography
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1762/22.01.21
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.