Assessment With Gait Analysis of Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Inverse Kinematic Alignment (RATKA-CBO)
Clinical & Biomechanical Outcome After Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty by Comparing Inverse Kinematic Alignment and Mechanical Alignment - Gait Analysis and Performance Testing
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Roeselare, Belgium, 8800
- AZDelta
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Written informed consent must be obtained prior to any screening procedures
- Received a primary total knee replacement (incl. patella) robotically-assisted
- Male or female
- Age between 50 and 80
- Able to walk independently
Exclusion Criteria:
- Revision surgery
- Patient with a history of neurological, psychiatric or neurodegenerative disease
- Any disorder, which in the investigator's opinion might jeopardise participant's safety or compliance with the protocol.
- Other musculoskeletal lesions that may affect the gait pattern
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: inverse Kinematic Alignment
|
Robotically Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty with a particular alignment strategy
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: adjusted Mechanical Alignment
|
Robotically Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty with a particular alignment strategy
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Gait Analysis - walking speed - faster is better
Time Frame: 2 year
|
Spatio Temporal Parameters are captured with infra-red camera during gait: velocity
|
2 year
|
|
Performance Testing - step-up step-down speed - faster is better
Time Frame: 2 year
|
Spatio Temporal Parameters are captured with infra-red camera during functional movements: velocity
|
2 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Reported Outcome Measures - Oxford Knee Score (OKS): maximum score (best) is 48/48; worst score is 0/48
Time Frame: baseline - 1 year - 2 year
|
Questionnaire - Oxford Knee Score
|
baseline - 1 year - 2 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- B3222020000151
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.