A Study of Switching Avatrombopag and Rh-TPO in ITP

May 29, 2021 updated by: Fuhaixia, Peking University People's Hospital

A Prospective Observational Study of Switching Avatrombopag and Rh-TPO in Chinese Adult Patients With Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) represent a highly effective and well-tolerated second-line ITP treatment that provides excellent responses.If there is cross-resistance between 2 drugs for the treatment of adult ITP is still unkonwn.The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of switching avatrombopag and rh-TPO in adults with ITP.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists (TPO-RAs) are novel treatments for patients with chronic Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP). According to the findings of mechanism-based studies, rhTPO competes with endogenous TPO for binding to TPO-R while avatrombopag has an additive effect with endogenous TPO, indicating that the treatment mechanism and side-effect profiles could be somewhat different between these drugs. If there is cross-resistance between 2 drugs for the treatment of adult ITP is still no answer. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of switching avatrombopag and rh-TPO in adults with ITP.This is a non-interventional study. Patients who fail previous steroids and receive rh-TPO and then switch to avatrombopag or vice versa will be enrolled. The reason for switch will be recorded. The efficacy, safety, and patient/physician preference will be assessed and compared between the two agents.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

adult ITP patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1.18 years or older 2.Primary ITP 3.Failed initial glucocorticosteroid treatment, 4.Applying rhTPO or Eltrombopag as subsequent treatment 5.Switch from rh-TPO to eltrombopag or vice versa 6.Normal neutrophils 7.Available follow-up at least 6 weeks after switching

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. HIV positive status, or active infection of HBV or HCV
  2. Suffering from a serious or progressive disease, which, in the investigator's judgment, put the subject at undue risk for participation in this study (i.e. cancer or pre-cancer, immunocompromised, uncontrolled diabetes, epilepsy, severe cardio-cerebrovascular disease(s) (i.e. stroke, idiopathic aortic stenosis, aneurysm, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, ischaemic heart disease, tachyarrhythmias, severe heart failure [classified as NYHA III-IV], severe lung dysfunctions, etc))
  3. History of thrombosis plus two or more risk factors as defined in Caprini thrombosis risk assessment model
  4. Lactating or pregnant women, or WOCBP who are unwilling to use highly effective contraceptive measures during the study period
  5. Abnormal liver and renal functions: AST or ALT or total bilirubin ≥1.5 × ULN, and/or creatinine ≥176.8 μmol/L
  6. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) that are pregnant or wish to become pregnant during the prospective phase of the study.
  7. Other conditions which the investigator considers inappropriate for enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rh-TPO) group
Patients who fail previous steroids and avatrombopag and then switch to Rh-TPO will be enrolled. The reason for switch will be recorded. Patients will be given rh-TPO 300 U/kg once daily for 14 days as initial treatment. After initial treatment, maintenance therapy were performance. At initial therapy, rhTPO will be suspended when platelet counts ≥100×10^9 / L. During maintenance therapy, patients with platelet counts >150×10^9 / L will suspend treatment until platelet counts drop to ≤150×10^9 / L. Dosing interval will be prolonged when platelet count is ≥100×10^9 / L to ≤150×10^9 / L. Dose modification is not required when platelet count is ≥30×10^9 / L to <100×10^9 / L. The efficacy, safety, and patient/physician preference will be assessed.
Avatrombopag group
Patients who fail previous steroids and rh-TPO and then switch to avatrombopag will be enrolled. The reason for switch will be recorded. Patients will be given avatrombopag 20mg once daily as initiate treatment, and adjust the dosage according to the count of platelets. The maximum dose of avatrombopag is 40mg daily.Avatrombopag will be terminated any time the platelet counts increased above 250×10^9/L. Dose adjustment of avatrombopag will be allowed to maintain platelet counts between 30×10^9/L and 150×10^9/L. The efficacy, safety, and patient/physician preference will be assessed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Initial response after switching
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Rate of response at 4 weeks after switching from rhTPO to avatrombopag or vise versa
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response rate at 12 weeks after switching
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Rate of response at 12 weeks after switching from rhTPO to avatrombopag or vise versa
12 weeks
Initial response after switching according to the reasons of switching
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Rate of response at 1 month after switching according to the reasons of switching,such as lack of efficacy, Platelet count fluctuations, development of adverse events,patient's or doctor's preference
4 weeks
Rate of response at 12 weeks after switching according to the reasons of switching
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Rate of response at 12 weeks after switching according to the reasons of switching,such as lack of efficacy, Platelet count fluctuations, development of adverse events,patient's or doctor's preference
12 weeks
Time to response
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Time to CR or R from switching
4 weeks
Durable response
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The maintenance of platelet count ≥ 30 x 10^9/L, at least 2-fold increase of the baseline count, the absence of bleeding, and no need for rescue medication at the 24 weeks follow-up.
24 weeks
Incidence of bleeding events
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Incidence of clinically significant bleeding as assessed using the world health organization (WHO) bleeding scale
24 weeks
Immune Thrombocytopenia Patient Assessment Questionnaire (ITP-PAQ)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
In all participants ,use ITP-PAQ to assess the Health Related Quality of Life(HRQoL) before and after treatment.
24 weeks
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy fatigue subscale (FACIT-F)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
In all participants ,use FACIT-F to assess the Health Related Quality of Life(HRQoL) before and after treatment.
24 weeks
Safety assessment
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Number of Participants with side effects of the drugs
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking University People's Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Haixia Fu, MD, Peking University People's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 29, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 4, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 29, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ITP-SWITCH1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings