Dystonia Treatment With Injections Supplemented By Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (D-TWIST)

September 16, 2024 updated by: University of Florida
We applied 16 sessions of rTMS over 4 consecutive days for adult patients suffering from cervical dystonia who received botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections on a regular basis. The TMS protocol took place 9 weeks following their last BoNT injection. The primary outcome measure was improvement in cervical dystonia as measured by the TWSTRS scale. The secondary outcome measures included mood, cognition, and gait measures.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This was a crossover study design in which patients were randomized to active or sham stimulation during session 1 (S1) and then crossed over to the condition they were not randomized to at first during session 2 (S1). Patients who were receiving BoNT injections for cervical dystonia on a regular basis but only noted benefit from BoNT for 9 weeks or less were eligible to participate. The total study protocol took place over 24 weeks. During week 1, patients had their regularly scheduled botox injections. During week 9, patients underwent either active or sham rTMS, as detailed below. They had outcome measures obtained at week 9 (S1:T0; baseline/pre-TMS), week 10 (S1:T1; post-TMS), and week 12 (S1:T2; 2 weeks post-TMS). At week 12, they underwent their regularly scheduled BoNT injections. During week 21, patients underwent either active or sham rTMS, whichever condition they were not randomized into during the first session. They then had outcome measures obtained at week 21 (S2:T0; baseline/pre-TMS), week 22 (S2:T1; post-TMS), and week 24 (S2:T2; 2 weeks post-TMS).

The neurostimulation protocol was as follows: The dPMC target was defined as 1 cm medial and 2 cm anterior to the site of RMT acquisition. The rTMS protocol was as follows: each session consisted of 1-Hz rTMS over the dPMC for 30 minutes (1800 pulses) at 90% of the RMT. Patients received 4 sessions per day for 4 consecutive days with a 10-minute break between each session. The daily duration of the rTMS protocol, including breaks, lasted approximately 160 minutes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
5

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32608
        • University of Florida Health Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 81 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients 18-85 years of age who receive regular botulinum toxin (BoNT) scheduled every 12 weeks, on stable optimized doses but with reported benefits lasting ≤ 9 weeks for 2 consecutive cycles. Patents followed at our center routinely fill out a self-reported form to document the duration of benefits perceived with BoNT therapy. Participants will be allowed to continue oral medications that they are taking for dystonia concurrently but will not be allowed to change their concurrent medication regimen throughout the duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of metallic objects or neurostimulators in the brain
  • Pregnancy
  • History of active seizures or epilepsy
  • Patients with severe scoliosis or other gait impairment that will preclude them from participating in gait evaluation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Active rTMS
Active rTMS will use a figure of eight TMS coil that will deliver real neurostimulation pulses to the patients.
Device: rTMS
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is a painless, noninvasive form of neurostimulation. This study uses an accelerated protocol in which the neurostimulation pulses are delivered in 4 sessions per day over 4 consecutive days (16 total sessions). Active or sham rTMS will be provided at 9 weeks following botox injections.
Other Names:
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS
Sham rTMS will use a sham figure of eight TMS coil that sounds and looks like a real rTMS coil, except no neurostimulation is being delivered to the patient.
Device: rTMS
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is a painless, noninvasive form of neurostimulation. This study uses an accelerated protocol in which the neurostimulation pulses are delivered in 4 sessions per day over 4 consecutive days (16 total sessions). Active or sham rTMS will be provided at 9 weeks following botox injections.
Other Names:
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)
Time Frame: Before rTMS (Session 1: Week 9, Session 2: Week 21), Immediately after rTMS (Session 1: Week 10, Session 2: Week 22), 2 weeks after rTMS (Session 1: Week 12, Session 2: Week 24)
This is an objective scale evaluating patients on a variety of features including maximal excursion, duration, effects of sensory trick, shoulder elevation, range of motion, and time. Scores range from 0 to 85 where a higher score indicates more severity.
Before rTMS (Session 1: Week 9, Session 2: Week 21), Immediately after rTMS (Session 1: Week 10, Session 2: Week 22), 2 weeks after rTMS (Session 1: Week 12, Session 2: Week 24)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: Before rTMS (Session 1: Week 9, Session 2: Week 21), Immediately after rTMS (Session 1: Week 10, Session 2: Week 22), 2 weeks after rTMS (Session 1: Week 12, Session 2: Week 24)
This is a 21-question survey evaluating depression in patients on a 0 to 3 scale, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum score 63, and higher score indicating a higher level of depression.
Before rTMS (Session 1: Week 9, Session 2: Week 21), Immediately after rTMS (Session 1: Week 10, Session 2: Week 22), 2 weeks after rTMS (Session 1: Week 12, Session 2: Week 24)
Trail-Making Test: Part A
Time Frame: Before rTMS (Session 1: Week 9, Session 2: Week 21), Immediately after rTMS (Session 1: Week 10, Session 2: Week 22), 2 weeks after rTMS (Session 1: Week 12, Session 2: Week 24)
Patients are instructed to connect circles in ascending numerical order and are scored on how quickly they are able to complete the task. A longer amount of time indicates more severe cognitive impairment (in general, more than 78 seconds to complete Part A is considered impaired).
Before rTMS (Session 1: Week 9, Session 2: Week 21), Immediately after rTMS (Session 1: Week 10, Session 2: Week 22), 2 weeks after rTMS (Session 1: Week 12, Session 2: Week 24)
Trail-Making Test: Part B
Time Frame: Before rTMS (Session 1: Week 9, Session 2: Week 21), Immediately after rTMS (Session 1: Week 10, Session 2: Week 22), 2 weeks after rTMS (Session 1: Week 12, Session 2: Week 24)
Patients are instructed to connect circles in ascending numerical order and are scored on how quickly they are able to complete the task. A longer amount of time indicates more severe cognitive impairment (in general, more than 273 seconds to complete Part B is considered impaired).
Before rTMS (Session 1: Week 9, Session 2: Week 21), Immediately after rTMS (Session 1: Week 10, Session 2: Week 22), 2 weeks after rTMS (Session 1: Week 12, Session 2: Week 24)
Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST) - %Total Errors
Time Frame: Before rTMS (Session 1: Week 9, Session 2: Week 21), Immediately after rTMS (Session 1: Week 10, Session 2: Week 22), 2 weeks after rTMS (Session 1: Week 12, Session 2: Week 24)
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test is a test of rule-learning and conceptual flexibility. The participant is required to learn to sort a series of cards according to one of three principles (color, form or number) based on response feedback. This measure is computed by calculating the ration of total errors to trials administered and multiplied by 100.
Before rTMS (Session 1: Week 9, Session 2: Week 21), Immediately after rTMS (Session 1: Week 10, Session 2: Week 22), 2 weeks after rTMS (Session 1: Week 12, Session 2: Week 24)
Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST) - %Perseverative Errors
Time Frame: Before rTMS (Session 1: Week 9, Session 2: Week 21), Immediately after rTMS (Session 1: Week 10, Session 2: Week 22), 2 weeks after rTMS (Session 1: Week 12, Session 2: Week 24)
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test is a test of rule-learning and conceptual flexibility. The participant is required to learn to sort a series of cards according to one of three principles (color, form or number) based on response feedback. This measure reflects the "density" of perseverative errors in relation to the overall test performance. It is computed by calculating the ration of total errors to trials administered and multiplied by 100.
Before rTMS (Session 1: Week 9, Session 2: Week 21), Immediately after rTMS (Session 1: Week 10, Session 2: Week 22), 2 weeks after rTMS (Session 1: Week 12, Session 2: Week 24)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Florida

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Dystonia Medical Research Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jun Yu, MD, MS, University of Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 7, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 20, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 7, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 16, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB202101156
  • OCR40846 (Other Identifier: UF OnCore)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings