The Impact of the SPIKES Protocol With IVF Patients
A Comparison of the SPIKES Protocol for Delivering Bad News to the Current Standard of Care in the in Vitro Fertilization Population
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Waltham, Massachusetts, United States, 02451
- Boston IVF
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10065
- Weill Cornell Medical Center Division of Reproductive Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female
- Age >18
- Underwent an embryo or blastocyst transfer using their own eggs at participating clinic
- Able to read and understand English
- Access to email
- Received a negative pregnancy test result phone call from a nurse involved in the research study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Partners of patients undergoing treatment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: SPIKES Protocol Compassionate Call
Nurses trained to contact IVF patients with negative pregnancy test results who were trained on the SPIKES-focused bad news delivery script.
|
Nurses trained to deliver bad news to IVF patients based on the Spikes-protocol for compassionately delivering bad news to patients.
|
|
No Intervention: Control: Standard of Care Call
Nurses who will continue to deliver bad news as they have been in the past without a script.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assess if the SPIKES-based nursing script is associated with a difference in perceived nursing compassion
Time Frame: Within 48 hours of phone call
|
We revised the Communicating Bad News questionnaire which follows the SPIKES protocol, published by Gonzales-Cabrera et al.
Their questionnaire had 25 items, Internal consistency was 0.816.
The content validity was established via the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test (KMO) with a score of 0.683 and the Bartlett test of sphericity was p<0.001.
The principal component analysis supported a four dimension construct.
There are 22 items rated 1, 2, 3 with a scoring range of 22-66.
For the Compassion Assessment, there are 19 slots for the 5 categories so the scoring range is 5-95.
The content validity was established via the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test (KMO) with a score of 0.683.
and the Bartlett test of sphericity was p<0.001.
The principal component analysis supported a four dimension construct.
There are 22 items rated 1,2,3 so the scoring range is 22-66.
For the Compassion Assessment, there are 19 slots for the 5 categories so the scoring range is 5-95.
|
Within 48 hours of phone call
|
|
Assess patient distress after receiving the negative pregnancy test phone call
Time Frame: Within 48 hours of phone call
|
We will use 5-point Likert scales to assess patient distress after receiving the negative pregnancy test phone call.
The Likert scale range is 1-5.
|
Within 48 hours of phone call
|
|
Assess patient depression after receiving the negative pregnancy test phone call
Time Frame: Within 48 hours of phone call
|
We will use 5-point Likert scales to assess patient depression after receiving the negative pregnancy test phone call.
The Likert scale range is 1-5.
|
Within 48 hours of phone call
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Alice Domar, PhD, Boston IVF
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- BN2021
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.