Abemaciclib Plus Ramucirumab for Esophageal/Gastroesophageal Junction Ca

February 4, 2026 updated by: Baylor Research Institute

Phase I/II Study of Abemaciclib + Ramucirumab in Metastatic Esophageal/Gastroesophageal Junction Carcinomas

CDK4/6 and Cyclin D1 are significantly expressed in approximately 80% of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction tumors suggesting that CDK4/6 inhibition may be a successful strategy in these chemotherapy and immunotherapy resistant diseases.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter, open label, phase I/II safety study that will enroll 30 subjects with metastatic esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas post first line systemic chemotherapy. Subjects will be treated with oral Abemaciclib 150 mg PO daily bid given with ramucirumab 8mg/kg every 2 weeks iv until evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicities.

A total of 30 subjects will be enrolled. The primary goal is to describe the safety profile of Abemaciclib in combination with Ramucirumab among all enrolled subjects.

If grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occur in 20 subjects, the upper bound of 95% Wilson confidence interval for the adverse event rate would be below 81% (16.7% - 47.9%).

The safety analysis will be performed in all treated subjects. Adverse event data will be listed individually and graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria, version 4.03.

Summary statistics will include counts and proportions as well as rates with 95% confidence intervals. Toxicities will be reported as a tabulated table by type and grade.

Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of subjects who achieve an objective response by RECIST1.1 criteria (i.e. Complete response or Partial Response) to Abemaciclib in combination with Ramucirumab. We will estimate the objective response rate, along with the Wilson 95% confidence interval, for the population of subjects.

Overall survival will be defined as the time from study enrollment to death. This will be summarized using a Kaplan-Meier curve.

The proportion of subjects with grade 4 or higher treatment-related adverse events will be monitored continuously throughout the trial using a Bayesian stopping guideline. A Beta (1, 19) prior, representing a toxicity rate of 5%, slightly lower than the expected rate of 6%, was used in the development of our guidelines. The therapy will be re-evaluated if the posterior probability that the toxicity rate exceeds 10% is greater than 75%. Table 3 summarizes the stopping boundaries starting with the initial cohort of 3 subjects through the maximum sample size of 30 subjects.

The probability of triggering the stopping guidelines was assessed for a range of possible toxicity rates using simulations with 5000 replicates. The probability of stopping to re-evaluate was 1% if the true proportion with an unacceptable toxicity was 5%. In comparison, the probability of stopping early was 99.6% if the true proportion with an unacceptable toxicity was 40%

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
8

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
        • Baylor University Medical Center, Charles A Sammons Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Subjects must meet all eligibility criteria. The key inclusion and exclusion criteria are as follows:

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • All subjects must have metastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal junction carcinomas (adenocarcinoma only)
  • ECOG performance status of 0 or 1
  • Tumor tissue must be available for correlative studies - Either a formalin fixed paraffin block or a minimum of ten 5-micron tissue section's (slides) of tumor biopsy sample must be available for biomarker evaluation.
  • Patients must have received at least one prior line of standard systemic therapy for recurrent or Stage IV disease, and that patients with HER2 overexpression have received an anti-HER2 drug.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Squamous cell carcinomas
  • Mixed histology with small cell component

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Abemaciclib plus Ramucirumab
Abemaciclib 150mg dose administered orally twice daily every day plus Ramucirumab dose 8mg/kg iv every 2 weeks until evidence of disease
Drug: Abemaciclib
150mg dose administered orally twice daily every day
Drug: Ramucirumab
8mg/kg iv every 2 weeks until evidence of disease

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To describe the safety profile of Abemaciclib + Ramucirumab as assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE v4.0).
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To assess objective response rate
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
To assess progression free survival
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
To assess overall survival
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
To determine the rate of stable disease at 3 months post targeted therapy
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Baylor Research Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ronan Kelly, MD, Charles A Sammons Cancer Center/Texas Oncology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 11, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 4, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 020-055

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Clinical Trials on Abemaciclib

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings