Treatment of Heart Failure Using Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells(hUC-MSC)

June 16, 2021 updated by: Shanghai East Hospital
This study is an exploratory clinical study to observe the improvement of heart function before and after the treatment by human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells, and the purpose is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of heart failure. The study is a randomized parallel controlled study. Patients receive a review of which main content includes symptom improvement, cardiac function improvement, and adverse events.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is an exploratory clinical study to observe the improvement of heart function before and after the treatment by human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells, and the purpose is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of heart failure. The study is a randomized parallel controlled study. The research process is as follows: 1. Twenty eligible patients with ischemic heart disease were recruited, fully informed, and signed a consent form, and randomly divided into CABG group (n=10) or CABG + stem cell treatment group (n=10); 2. CABG was performed under general anesthesia in both groups. In the cell therapy group, 1×10^7 human umbilical cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells were injected to the edge of the myocardial infarction area at 20 points at the same time in CABG; 3. Use vasoactive drugs and antibiotics to prevent infection one week after surgery. After the operation, before discharge, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after discharge, and once a year thereafter, until the death of the patient. Patients receive a review of which main content includes symptom improvement, cardiac function improvement, and adverse events.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200120
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai Tongji University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 70 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patients with coronary heart disease, the effect of drug treatment is not good, and the clinical manifestations of left ventricular insufficiency occur, EF<40%;
  • Coronary angiography confirmed that there is a chronic occlusive disease of the coronary artery, which is manifested as severe stenosis of single or multiple coronary vessels (≥75%), or even complete occlusion;
  • After the doctor explained the treatment process and possible toxic and side effects, he was willing to treat and agreed to cooperate in the observation of the efficacy. But patients can withdraw from clinical trials and long-term follow-up observation at any time and unconditionally;
  • The patient has no mental illness and language dysfunction and can fully understand the treatment method.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Does not meet the above selection criteria;
  • Unable to sign the informed consent form, unable to comply with the agreed timetable of this study;
  • There are reasons to suspect that the patient was forced to join the trial;
  • Acute left ventricular insufficiency, cardiogenic shock;
  • The patient has any infectious diseases (including bacterial and viral infections);
  • Others who are clinically considered unsuitable for this treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: CABG with hUC-MSC treatment group
In the CABG with hUC-MSC treatment group, 1×10^7 human umbilical cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells were injected to the edge of the myocardial infarction area at 20 points at the same time in CABG.
Biological: Allogeneic Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells
In CABG with hUC-MSC treatment group, 1×10^7 Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells were injected at the edge of the myocardial infarction area at 20 points at the same time in CABG
No Intervention: CABG group
CABG was performed under general anesthesia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Left ventricular ejection fraction
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Day 360, Day 720
The change in Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) % after the operation
Day 0, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Day 360, Day 720
Left ventricular end diastolic volume
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Day 360, Day 720
The change in Left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) ml after the operation
Day 0, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Day 360, Day 720
Left ventricular end systolic volume
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Day 360, Day 720
The change in Left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) ml after the operation
Day 0, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Day 360, Day 720
Stroke volume
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Day 360, Day 720
The change in Stroke volume (SV) ml after the operation
Day 0, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Day 360, Day 720
Left ventricular apex four-chamber end systolic diameter
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Day 360, Day 720
The change in Left ventricular apex four-chamber end systolic diameter (LVESD) mm after the operation
Day 0, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Day 360, Day 720
6 minutes walking distance
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Day 360, Day 720
The change in 6 minutes walking distance m after the operation
Day 0, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Day 360, Day 720

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION QUALITY OF LIFE (WHOQOL) -BREF
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Day 360, Day 720
The change in THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION QUALITY OF LIFE (WHOQOL) -BREF after the operation
Day 0, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Day 360, Day 720

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shanghai East Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Zhongmin Liu, Doctor, Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai Tongji University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 27, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 16, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MR-31-20-000323

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings