Study of Neurobiological Predictors of Response to Non-invasive Neurostimulation and Genetic Susceptibility to Dementia in Patients With Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

July 25, 2021 updated by: Suellen Marinho Andrade

Neurobiological Predictors of Response to Non-invasive Neurostimulation and Genetic Susceptibility to Dementia in Patients With Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (CCL)

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is a non-invasive neuromodulatory technique that results in the clinical improvement of patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment, a prodromal condition for the onset of dementia. The responses to treatment depend on the characteristics of the patients and the parameters adjusted in the equipment, which makes the modeling of electric fields imperative to maximize the safety profile and therapeutic potential of the technique. The study of neurobiological predictors of response to non-invasive neurostimulation and genetic susceptibility can elucidate current effects according to the individual's profile. The objectives of this study are to observe the effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation with optimized/customized parameters in patients with amnestic CCL, considering the subjects' genetic susceptibility to Alzheimer's Disease and neurobiological markers. This is a randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial. Neuropsychological tests and a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire will be used to assess and characterize the subjects. Participants captured by the Laboratory of Studies in Aging and Neuroscience at the Federal University of Paraíba will be divided into 02 groups, each with 25 patients, totaling 50 volunteers: Active - participants who will receive real current; Sham - participants who will receive simulated stimulation. Participants entered through the eligibility criteria will be randomly allocated in a simple way, at a rate of 1:1. Payment parameters will be customized by Computational Modeling with the aid of the SimNIBS Program and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. The electroencephalogram and evaluation of polymorphisms of the gene encoding Apolipoprotein E examined as predictors of response. Data will be processed from the Statistical Package for Social Sciences® (20.0) Software, applying the Student test for continuous variables or chi-square for categorical variables. Predictive analysis will be conducted from Machine Learning. It is expected to find improvements in the scores of memory and general cognition tests after the intervention protocol with tDCS with individualized dose in the group that will receive an intervention, compared to the simulated neurostimulation group. These obtained results optimize the practice, elucidating issues still present due to the different applications of the technique produced in the literature on the subject.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Neuropsychological tests and a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire will be used to assess and characterize the subjects. Participants captured by the Laboratory of Studies in Aging and Neuroscience at the Federal University of Paraíba will be divided into 02 groups, each with 25 patients, totaling 50 volunteers: Active - participants who will receive real current; Sham - participants who will receive simulated stimulation. Participants entered through the eligibility criteria will be randomly allocated in a simple way, at a rate of 1:1. Payment parameters will be customized by Computational Modeling with the aid of the SimNIBS Program and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. The electroencephalogram and evaluation of polymorphisms of the gene encoding Apolipoprotein E examined as predictors of response.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • Paraíba
      • João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil, 58051-900
        • Federal University of Paraíba,Department of Psychology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 85 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI);
  • Both sexes;
  • Aged 65 years or older, without a diagnosis of dementia will be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable medical conditions;
  • Patients with metallic implants and pacemakers;
  • Epileptics;
  • Using drugs/alcohol, regular use of hypnotics and benzodiazepines up to two weeks before the start of the study;
  • People who have been using medication with cholinergic inhibitors for more than two months before this clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Active tDCS

SimNIBS will be used for modeling. It is a free and open source software package for the simulation of electric field induced by tDCS in the individual brain.

Modeling will be done using T1-weighted anatomical images of each subject to reconstruct a high-resolution head model of each individual. For electrode placement, we will simulate areas F5 and F6, according to the EEG 10-20 system, for the anode and cathode, respectively, targeting the left and right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC). This group will receive active tDCS, for 30 minutes and for 5 consecutive days, in two weeks, with an anode positioned on the left DLPFC and a cathode electrode placed on the right supraorbital area.
Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

Initially, a measuring tape will be used to make the markings and measurements necessary for placing the electrodes.

Regarding neurostimulation, the tDCS device is simple and portable, consisting of four main components: two electrodes (anode and cathode), an ammeter (electric current intensity meter), a potentiometer (voltage controller between electrodes) and a set of batteries. We will use the TCT-Research Neurostimulator, developed by Trans Cranial Technologies (Hong Kong, China), Regarding the protocols, the Active tDCS group will receive active tDCS for 30 minutes and for 5 consecutive days, in two weeks, with an anode positioned on the left DLPFC and a cathode electrode placed on the right supraorbital area. The 10-20 International EEG system will be taken as a reference. The current intensity will be defined from computational modeling, using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) to estimate and individualize the dose to be administered.
Sham Comparator: Sham tDCS
The electrodes will be placed in the same way as in the Active tDCS group. However, individuals in this group will receive a stimulation that will last only 20-30 seconds. Afterwards, the device will be turned off, no longer emitting current.
Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

Initially, a measuring tape will be used to make the markings and measurements necessary for placing the electrodes.

Regarding neurostimulation, the tDCS device is simple and portable, consisting of four main components: two electrodes (anode and cathode), an ammeter (electric current intensity meter), a potentiometer (voltage controller between electrodes) and a set of batteries. We will use the TCT-Research Neurostimulator, developed by Trans Cranial Technologies (Hong Kong, China), Regarding the protocols, the Active tDCS group will receive active tDCS for 30 minutes and for 5 consecutive days, in two weeks, with an anode positioned on the left DLPFC and a cathode electrode placed on the right supraorbital area. The 10-20 International EEG system will be taken as a reference. The current intensity will be defined from computational modeling, using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) to estimate and individualize the dose to be administered.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (T0)
Time Frame: The evoluations will be carried out in Pre-intervention (T0)

To assess the primary outcome, the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) o will be used, developed in the United States and published in 1975, whose maximum score is 30 points and includes questions about memory, attention , orientation, language, and visuospatial skills.

We will adopt the 24-point score for the standard cut, following recommendations expressed in the literature. In order to avoid false positives and false negatives, we will perform the stratification by levels or years of schooling, as educational level is the main predictor of MMSE performance.

Authors recorded good internal consistency (0.62 to 0.79) and a high test-retest reliability of the MMSE, ranging from 0.76 to 0.90, being a reliable instrument to detect CCL and AD .
The evoluations will be carried out in Pre-intervention (T0)
Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (T1)
Time Frame: The evoluations will be performed up to one week after the stimulation protocol (T1)

To assess the primary outcome, the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) o will be used, developed in the United States and published in 1975, whose maximum score is 30 points and includes questions about memory, attention , orientation, language, and visuospatial skills.

We will adopt the 24-point score for the standard cut, following recommendations expressed in the literature. In order to avoid false positives and false negatives, we will perform the stratification by levels or years of schooling, as educational level is the main predictor of MMSE performance.

Authors recorded good internal consistency (0.62 to 0.79) and a high test-retest reliability of the MMSE, ranging from 0.76 to 0.90, being a reliable instrument to detect CCL and AD .
The evoluations will be performed up to one week after the stimulation protocol (T1)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Digit Span Memory Test
Time Frame: The evoluations will be carried out in Pre-intervention (T0)
This is one of the main tasks used in short-term memory assessment, where the examiner asks the patient to repeat a series of numbers (eg 2-5, 3-6-7). The first sequence starts with two digits, and after each correct answer the examiner adds one digit to the next sequence. The test is composed of two parts, in forward and reverse order, allowing the assessment of short-term memory storage capacity and its executive component.
The evoluations will be carried out in Pre-intervention (T0)
Digit Span Memory Test
Time Frame: The evoluations will be performed up to one week after the stimulation protocol (T1)
This is one of the main tasks used in short-term memory assessment, where the examiner asks the patient to repeat a series of numbers (eg 2-5, 3-6-7). The first sequence starts with two digits, and after each correct answer the examiner adds one digit to the next sequence. The test is composed of two parts, in forward and reverse order, allowing the assessment of short-term memory storage capacity and its executive component.
The evoluations will be performed up to one week after the stimulation protocol (T1)
Beck Depression Scale II and Beck Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: The evoluations will be carried out in Pre-intervention (T0)

The Beck II Depression Scale, a self-report instrument for depression, has 21 items that reveal how the individual has felt during the last two weeks (including the current day), in which there are four answers for each one (with a score ranging from 0 to 3). The total score is the sum of individual items, whose maximum score can reach 63 points, being classified into levels: mild, moderate and severe.

The Beck Anxiety Inventory consists of 21 items that assess how the individual has been feeling during the last two weeks, including the current day, enabling the collection of information about anxiety symptoms. Each item has 4 options, among which one can be chosen by the participant (ranging from 0 to 3 the score of each option). The total score is calculated by adding the individual response for each item, with a maximum score of 63 points. The results will be used as a prediction of response to neurostimulation.
The evoluations will be carried out in Pre-intervention (T0)
Beck Depression Scale II and Beck Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: The evoluations will be performed up to one week after the stimulation protocol (T1)

The Beck II Depression Scale, a self-report instrument for depression, has 21 items that reveal how the individual has felt during the last two weeks (including the current day), in which there are four answers for each one (with a score ranging from 0 to 3). The total score is the sum of individual items, whose maximum score can reach 63 points, being classified into levels: mild, moderate and severe.

The Beck Anxiety Inventory consists of 21 items that assess how the individual has been feeling during the last two weeks, including the current day, enabling the collection of information about anxiety symptoms. Each item has 4 options, among which one can be chosen by the participant (ranging from 0 to 3 the score of each option). The total score is calculated by adding the individual response for each item, with a maximum score of 63 points. The results will be used as a prediction of response to neurostimulation.
The evoluations will be performed up to one week after the stimulation protocol (T1)
Genetic susceptibility (ApoE)
Time Frame: The evoluations will be carried out in Pre-intervention (T0)
For ApoE allele genotyping, the researchers will follow the recommendations proposed by Crook, Hardy & Duff (1994) and Wenham, Newton, & Price (1991), and the genomic DNA will be amplified by a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). The results will be used as a prediction of response to neurostimulation.
The evoluations will be carried out in Pre-intervention (T0)
Electroencephalography
Time Frame: The evoluations will be carried out in Pre-intervention (T0)
Brain electrical activity will be captured using the BrainVision actiCHamp32 equipment (Brain vision, Herrsching, Germany), using 32 Ag/AgCl electrodes, which will be positioned and fixed based on the 10-20 International System. The data will be used to assess brain electrical activity at baseline.
The evoluations will be carried out in Pre-intervention (T0)
Electroencephalography (EEG)
Time Frame: The evoluations will be performed up to one week after the stimulation protocol (T1)
Brain electrical activity will be captured using the BrainVision actiCHamp32 equipment (Brain vision, Herrsching, Germany), using 32 Ag/AgCl electrodes, which will be positioned and fixed based on the 10-20 International System. The regions of interest to be monitored are: prefrontal, frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital region, bilaterally (Fz, F3, F7, FT9, FC5, FC1, C3, T7, TP9, CP5, CP1, Pz, P3, P7, O1, Oz, O2, P4, P8, TP10, CP6, CP2, Cz, C4, T8, FT10, FC6, FC2, F4, F8, Fp2, Fp1), in the silent condition in the eyes and eyes closed states , for five minutes each, totaling 10 minutes of collection for each subject. The results will be used as a prediction of response to neurostimulation.
The evoluations will be performed up to one week after the stimulation protocol (T1)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-MRI
Time Frame: The evoluations will be carried out in Pre-intervention (T0)
High-resolution anatomical images will be acquired using a T1-weighted fast gradient sequence prepared by three-dimensional magnetization with the following parameters: repetition time (TR) = 1900ms, echo time (TE) = 2.2 ms, inversion time (TI) = 900 ms, inversion angle (FA) = 9°, number of slices = 176, slice thickness = 1 mm, voxel size = 1 × 1 × 1 mm 3 and matrix = 256 × 256. The results will be used for computational modeling and to assess brain electrical activity at baseline.
The evoluations will be carried out in Pre-intervention (T0)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-MRI
Time Frame: The evoluations will be performed up to one week after the stimulation protocol (T1)
High-resolution anatomical images will be acquired using a T1-weighted fast gradient sequence prepared by three-dimensional magnetization with the following parameters: repetition time (TR) = 1900ms, echo time (TE) = 2.2 ms, inversion time (TI) = 900 ms, inversion angle (FA) = 9°, number of slices = 176, slice thickness = 1 mm, voxel size = 1 × 1 × 1 mm 3 and matrix = 256 × 256. The results will be used as a prediction of response to neurostimulation.
The evoluations will be performed up to one week after the stimulation protocol (T1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Suellen Marinho Andrade

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 26, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 25, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 25, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 20, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 25, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • tDCS in MCI

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings