Clinical Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of a Medical Device for the Treatment of Toenail Onychomycosis
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Tunis, Tunisia
- Pr Doss office
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient having given her/his informed, written consent.
- Patient cooperative and aware of the modalities of use and the necessity and duration of the controls so that perfect adhesion to the protocol can be expected.
- Patient being psychologically able to understand information and to give their/his/her consent.
- Age: more than 18 years.
- Subject with superficial onychomycosis on at least one great toenail or light to moderate disto-lateral onychomycosis (without matrix involvement and involvement <2/3 of the tablet).
- Patient with positive KOH staining.
- Patient having stopped any systemic antifungal treatment since at least 6 months before inclusion and/or any topical antifungal treatment since at least 3 months before inclusion.
- Women of childbearing potential should use an accepted contraceptive regimen since at least 12 weeks before the beginning of the study, during all the study and at least 1 month after study end.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or nursing woman or planning a pregnancy during the investigation;
- Patient considered by the Investigator likely to be non-compliant with the protocol.
- Patient enrolled in another clinical trial during the test period.
- Subject having a known allergy to one of the constituents of the tested products.
- Patient with a condition or receiving a medication which, in the investigator's judgment, put the subject at undue risk;
- Patient suffering from serious or progressive diseases (to investigator's discretion) such as uncontrolled diabetes, peripheral circulatory disease, HIV, psoriasis, lichen planus, immunosuppressive pathology…
- Subject with cutaneous pathology on studied zone (other than onychomycosis like angioma, dermatitis…).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Loceryl 5%
|
One application per week for 3 months
|
|
Experimental: Solver Pen
|
One application per day for 3 months
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of healthy surface (performance)
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Variation of the percentage of healthy surface after 90 days of treatment with the test medical device or reference versus baseline value.
Evaluation is done in blind by digital analysis of photographs of the great, infected toenail.
|
90 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of healthy surface (performance)
Time Frame: 30 and 60 days
|
Variation of the percentage of healthy surface after 30 and 60 days of treatment with the test medical device or reference versus baseline.
Blinded evaluation is performed by digital analysis of photographs of the great, infected toenail.
|
30 and 60 days
|
|
Microbiological efficacy: KOH staining (performance)
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Evaluation of microbiological efficacy of both treatments by KOH staining on D90 versus baseline.
|
90 days
|
|
Microbiological efficacy: fungal culture (performance)
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Evaluation of microbiological efficacy of both treatments by fungal culture on D90 versus baseline.
|
90 days
|
|
Clinical efficacy: onychomycosis evolution (performance)
Time Frame: 30, 60 and 90 days
|
Blinded assessment of clinical efficacy of both treatments on D0 (baseline), D30, D60 and D90 by evaluation of onychomycosis evolution on a 4-point scale (failure to success)
|
30, 60 and 90 days
|
|
Clinical efficacy: onycholysis (performance)
Time Frame: 30, 60 and 90 days
|
Blinded assessment of clinical efficacy of both treatments on D0 (baseline), D30, D60 and D90 by evaluation of onycholysis on a 5-point scale (none to severe)
|
30, 60 and 90 days
|
|
Clinical efficacy: nail distrophy (performance)
Time Frame: 30, 60 and 90 days
|
Blinded assessment of clinical efficacy of both treatments on D0 (baseline), D30, D60 and D90 by evaluation of nail distrophy on a 5-point scale (none to severe)
|
30, 60 and 90 days
|
|
Clinical efficacy: nail discoloration (performance)
Time Frame: 30, 60 and 90 days
|
Blinded assessment of clinical efficacy of both treatments on D0 (baseline), D30, D60 and D90 by evaluation of nail discoloration on a 5-point scale (none to severe)
|
30, 60 and 90 days
|
|
Clinical efficacy: nail thickening (performance)
Time Frame: 30, 60 and 90 days
|
Blinded assessment of clinical efficacy of both treatments on D0 (baseline), D30, D60 and D90 by evaluation of nail thickening on a 5-point scale (none to severe)
|
30, 60 and 90 days
|
|
Impact on quality of life (performance)
Time Frame: 60 and 90 days
|
Evaluation of the impact on the quality of life (QoL) of the patients using a validated questionnaire (NailQoL: Nail Questionnaire Of Life from 0=no impact on life quality to 100=maximum impact on life quality) before (baseline) and 60 and 90 days of treatment with the test medical device or reference, respectively.
|
60 and 90 days
|
|
Subjective evaluation questionnaire for the patient (performance)
Time Frame: 14, 30, 60 and 90 days of treatment
|
Evaluation of efficacy, tolerance, and acceptability cosmetic aspect, usability…) of the investigational device by the patients using a subjective evaluation questionnaire (answers to questions with 5 modalities from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree"), performed at each visit and at D14 (via phone).
|
14, 30, 60 and 90 days of treatment
|
|
Assessment of local tolerance by the investigator (safety and tolerability)
Time Frame: 30, 60 and 90 days
|
Evaluation of local tolerance of the test medical device at each visit.
Assessment is performed by the investigator via clinical evaluation and subject interrogation on a scale from 0 (bad tolerance) to 3 (very good tolerance)
|
30, 60 and 90 days
|
|
Incidence of Adverse events (safety and tolerability)
Time Frame: 30, 60 and 90 days
|
Collection of Adverse events and adverse device effects throughout the study
|
30, 60 and 90 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nejib Doss, MD, Eurofins Dermscan Tunisia
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 19E2407
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.