Neurobiomarker for Prism Adaptation Treatment Response
Development of a Neuroimaging Biomarker to Identify Optimal Candidates for Prism Adaptation Treatment
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84108
- University of Utah
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
1) within 1 month of right hemisphere stroke
2) suspected of having unilateral spatial neglect
3) able to provide consent
4) likely to remain in rehabilitation for 10-12 days or willing to return to the University to complete 10 sessions of treatment and post-treatment testing
5) able to have an MRI
6) will be or has been admitted to the Craig H. Neilson Rehabilitation Hospital for rehabilitation or is able to come to the Craig H. Neilson Rehabilitation Hospital for prism adaptation therapy sessions.
7) age 18-90 years
8) able to sit in a wheelchair or other chair for 1 hour
9) able to point straight ahead and hold a pen with right hand
Exclusion Criteria:
1) other neurologic, medical that would interfere with ability to complete the testing or training
2) no uncorrected visual or hearing problems, other than hemianopsia
3) contraindications to MRI
4) unable to provide consent due to significant aphasia or cognitive impairment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Prism Adaptation Therapy
10 sessions (60 trials each) 1x/day of Prism Adaptation Therapy
|
Participants wear goggles with built-in prisms (a 20-diopter lens) that shift the visual scene to the right.
While wearing the googles they reach to and cross out 60 lines/circles, requiring them to learn to reach more leftward than the visual targets appear.
Participants can only see the end of their movements.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Catherine Bergego Scale
Time Frame: baseline before prism adaptation therapy
|
asks the impact of neglect behavior on 20 everyday tasks using a 0-3 rating scale.
Higher scores = more neglect impact.
Total score is sum of item scores
|
baseline before prism adaptation therapy
|
|
Catherine Bergego Scale
Time Frame: post-intervention immediately after prism adaptation therapy
|
asks the impact of neglect behavior on 20 everyday tasks using a 0-3 rating scale.
Higher scores = more neglect impact.
Total score is sum of item scores
|
post-intervention immediately after prism adaptation therapy
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Behavioral Attention Test conventional subtests
Time Frame: baseline pre-prism adaptation therapy
|
traditional neuropsychological subtests (line crossing, letter cancelation, star cancellation, figure and shape copying, line bisection, and representational drawing).
Total score is the sum of scores on subtests with highest score being 146.
A score of 129 or higher indicates neglect
|
baseline pre-prism adaptation therapy
|
|
Behavioral Attention Test conventional subtests
Time Frame: post-intervention immediately after prism adaptation therapy
|
traditional neuropsychological subtests (line crossing, letter cancelation, star cancellation, figure and shape copying, line bisection, and representational drawing).
Total score is the sum of scores on subtests with highest score being 146.
A score of 129 or higher indicates neglect
|
post-intervention immediately after prism adaptation therapy
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Goedert KM, Chen P, Boston RC, Foundas AL, Barrett AM. Presence of Motor-Intentional Aiming Deficit Predicts Functional Improvement of Spatial Neglect With Prism Adaptation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Jun;28(5):483-93. doi: 10.1177/1545968313516872. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
- Goedert KM, Chen P, Foundas AL, Barrett AM. Frontal lesions predict response to prism adaptation treatment in spatial neglect: A randomised controlled study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020 Jan;30(1):32-53. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2018.1448287. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB_00140741
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.