Cohort Study Comparing Surgeon Stress, Utilization of Surgical Instruments, Surgical Outcomes According to Surgical Approach for Gastrectomy
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Hyoung-Il Kim
- Phone Number: 82-2-2228-2095
- Email: cairus@yuhs.ac
Study Locations
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
- Recruiting
- Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
-
Contact:
- Hyoung-Il Kim
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with gastric cancer scheduled for gastrectomy
Exclusion Criteria:
Vulnerable subject (illiterate, pregnant)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
|---|
|
LC
laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments
|
|
LW
Using wristed laparoscopic instruments (Artisential Maryland dissector, Artisential Fenestrated grasper)
|
|
RC
Conventional robotic surgery
|
|
RSS
Use of single site system for reduced port robotic surgery
|
|
RSP
Use of da Vinci SP system for reduced port robotic surgery
|
|
RRI
A new surgical robot Revo-i developed by Meerae company in Korea
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
complication
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
One of the most important surgical outcome, complication will be measured at 1 month after surgery
|
1 month after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
operative time (min)
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
1 month after surgery
|
|
bleeding(ml)
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
1 month after surgery
|
|
gas passing(day)
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
1 month after surgery
|
|
hospital stay(day)
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
1 month after surgery
|
|
readmission rate(percent)
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
1 month after surgery
|
|
Heart rate variability of surgeon
Time Frame: during the operation
|
during the operation
|
|
Duration for each surgical instruments
Time Frame: during the operation
|
during the operation
|
|
number of use for each surgical instruments
Time Frame: during the operation
|
during the operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Hyoung-Il Kim, Yonsei University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, Ryu SW, Lee HJ, Song KY. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):417-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b.
- Grantcharov PD, Boillat T, Elkabany S, Wac K, Rivas H. Acute mental stress and surgical performance. BJS Open. 2018 Sep 27;3(1):119-125. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.104. eCollection 2019 Feb.
- Jeong O, Park YK. Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;11(2):69-77. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2011.11.2.69. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
- Kim YM, Baek SE, Lim JS, Hyung WJ. Clinical application of image-enhanced minimally invasive robotic surgery for gastric cancer: a prospective observational study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Feb;17(2):304-12. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2094-0. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
- Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994 Apr;4(2):146-8. Erratum In: Surg Laparosc Endosc. 2013 Oct;23(5):480.
- Lee JH, Kim KM, Cheong JH, Noh SH. Current management and future strategies of gastric cancer. Yonsei Med J. 2012 Mar;53(2):248-57. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.2.248.
- Lee S, Kim JK, Kim YN, Jang DS, Kim YM, Son T, Hyung WJ, Kim HI. Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4002-4009. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5435-y. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
- Liu ZY, Chen QY, Zhong Q, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang ZN, Lin JL, Zheng HL, Zheng CH, Huang CM, Li P. Is three-dimensional laparoscopic spleen preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer better than that of two-dimensional? Analysis of a prospective clinical research study. Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3425-3435. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06640-7. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
- Niitsu H, Hirabayashi N, Yoshimitsu M, Mimura T, Taomoto J, Sugiyama Y, Murakami S, Saeki S, Mukaida H, Takiyama W. Using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) global rating scale to evaluate the skills of surgical trainees in the operating room. Surg Today. 2013 Mar;43(3):271-5. doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0313-7. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
- Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L, Badessi F, Pugliese L, Vinci A, Klersy C, Spinoglio G. Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg. 2012 Aug;147(8):709-14. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.508.
- Vizza E, Corrado G, Mancini E, Baiocco E, Patrizi L, Fabrizi L, Colantonio L, Cimino M, Sindico S, Forastiere E. Robotic single-site hysterectomy in low risk endometrial cancer: a pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;20(8):2759-64. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2922-9. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
- Yang SY, Roh KH, Kim YN, Cho M, Lim SH, Son T, Hyung WJ, Kim HI. Surgical Outcomes After Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;24(7):1770-1777. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5851-1. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
- Zeng YK, Yang ZL, Peng JS, Lin HS, Cai L. Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials. Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):39-52. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182583e2e.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 4-2021-0409
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.